Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the sub-thalamic nucleus (STN) has evolved over the past decades as a mainstream therapy for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The classical procedure consists in STN indirect targeting based on stereotactic atlases or statistical coordinates in AC-PC (Anterior Commissure - Posterior Commissure) referential along with target control and correction by micro-electrode recordings (MER) and awake clinical testing. To avoid potential complications and patient discomfort related to current procedure, asleep surgery without this control process has become more and more performed, essentially thanks to the progress of neuroimaging allowing to STN visualization. However, it has been reported a relative inaccuracy between the "radiological" STN delimitated on several types of MRI sequences (T2, T2*, SWI) and the per-operative electrophysiological findings. As a result, there are currently many types of STN-DBS procedures, and the lack of standardization between techniques complicates the interpretation of postoperative results on anatomical, electrophysiological and clinical points of view. Furthermore, to date, it has not been proven that asleep surgery without MER and clinical controls is as effective as the standard procedure in a prospective controlled randomized clinical trial.
Investigators hypothesize that the clinical-based 18 landmarks STN target will be precise enough to allow to perform surgery under general anesthesia without MER correction, and accurate enough to achieve non inferior clinical results compared to what is usually done in each centre.
The main objective is to compare at one year, the % of motor improvement after PARKEO 2-targeting asleep DBS without intraoperative MER versus the targeting procedure using intraoperative MER by the UPRDRS 3 (Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale 3).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PARKEO 2 targeting with asleep deep brain stimulation procedure | Experimental | Participant with parkeo 2 targeting procedure |
|
| Usual DBS procedure | Active Comparator | Participant with usual targeting and surgery |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surgery under general anesthesia with experimental targeting | Procedure | Surgery will be performed under general anesthesia. The electrodes will be inserted directly on the targets without MER, with PARKEO_2 targets provided by the Bordeaux University Hospital, based on the machine-learning model developed in Bordeaux. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Stimulation efficacy | The primary endpoint is the efficacy of the stimulation on motor symptoms assessed by the change in UPDRS-3 scores between OFF and ON stimulation evaluations at one year after surgery without any medical treatment (OFF medication). Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale 3 (UPDRS 3) questionnaire: 0 to 132 points, with the highest score indicating worsening | 12 months after surgery (M12) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of life assessment | Quality of life on the Parkinson Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ39) scale assessed by the change in PDQ39 scores. PDQ 39 questionnaire : 0 to 156 points, with the highest score indicating worsening condition | inclusion (Month-1) and 12 months after surgery (M12) |
| Stereotactic accuracy |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Julien ENGELHARDT, Dr | University Hospital, Bordeaux | Principal Investigator |
| Emmanuel CUNY, Pr | University Hospital, Bordeaux | Study Director |
| Antoine BENARD, Dr | University Hospital, Bordeaux | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Amiens | Amiens | France | ||||
| CHU de Bordeaux |
Not provided
National multicentre, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority, open label, comparative clinical trial in 2 parallel groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Usual Surgery | Procedure | In the control group, surgery will be performed as usual in each centre under local or general anaesthesia. This group represents the current state of the art of deep brain stimulation in these centres. |
|
Stereotactic accuracy as measured by the Euclidian distance between active contact location and intra-operative defined target in each group |
| Surgery intervention (Month 0) |
| Operative characteristics (1) | Operative characteristic : procedure length | Surgery intervention (Month 0) |
| Operative characteristics (2) | Operative characteristic : radiation dose | Surgery intervention (Month 0) |
| Operative characteristics (3) | Operative characteristic : pneumocephalus | Surgery intervention (Month 0) |
| Operative characteristics (4) | Operative characteristic : and length of hospital stay (in days). | Surgery intervention (Month 0) |
| Distance between active contact location and preoperative target | Distance between active contact location and preoperative defined target in each group | Surgery intervention (Month 0) |
| Improvement of UPDRS3 | The percentage of improvement of UPDRS3 calculated between the preoperative OFF and the post-operative ON stimulation scores at one year and compared between the two groups. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale 3 (UPDRS 3) questionnaire: 0 to 132 points, with the highest score indicating worsening | 12 months after surgery (M12) |
| Efficacy of the targeting procedure on motor symptoms (1) | The efficacy of the targeting procedure on motor symptoms assessed by the change in UPDRS-3 scores between OFF and ON stimulation evaluations at one year after surgery without any medical treatment (OFF medication). The change will be calculated as a difference between the OFF and ON stimulation scores at one year. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale 3 (UPDRS 3) questionnaire: 0 to 132 points, with the highest score indicating worsening | 12 months after surgery (M12) |
| Efficacy of the targeting procedure on motor symptoms (2) | The efficacy of the targeting procedure on motor symptoms compared to the efficacy of L-DOPA by the change in UPDRS-3 scores between OFF and ON stimulation evaluations at one year after surgery without any medical treatment (OFF medication). The change will be calculated as a ratio between the effect of stimulation alone versus medication alone at one year. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale 3 (UPDRS 3) questionnaire: 0 to 132 points, with the highest score indicating worsening | 12 months after surgery (M12) |
| reduction in the levodopa equivalent daily doses (LEDD) | The reduction in the levodopa equivalent daily doses (LEDD) from the baseline and one year (a 100-mg daily dose of standard levodopa is equivalent to the following doses of other medications: 133 mg of controlled-release levodopa; 75 mg of levodopa plus entacapone; 1 mg of pergolide, pramipexole lisuride, or cabergoline; 5 mg of ropinirole; 10 mg of bromocriptine or apomorphine; and 20 mg of dihydroergocryptine) will be evaluated | 12 months after surgery (M12) |
| Post-operative cognitive | Post-operative cognitive will be assess by the difference from the baseline and one year using MDRS. Mattis Dementia Rating Scale: 0 to 144 points, with the most important score indicating improvement in condition | 12 months after surgery (M12) |
| Post-operative mood | Post-operative mood will be assess by the difference from the baseline and one year using BDI scale. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI): 0 to 63 points, with the most important score indicating worsening condition | 12 months after surgery (M12) |
| Intra and post-operative surgical complications | Intra and post-operative surgical complications (haemorrhage, infection, neuromodulation-related side effects) will be prospectively collected and assessed | Surgery intervention (Month 0) |
| Total cost of each procedure (PARKEO-2 targeting compared to targeting procedure using intraoperative MER) | A cost analysis will be performed to assess all hospital resources | Surgery intervention (Month 0) |
| Cost-effectiveness ratio, expressed in terms of cost per Qaly gained at 1 year | This ratio will provide useful information about the costs (avoided or additional) required to gain a Qaly, one year after surgery, from the French healthcare system point of view | 12 months after surgery (M12) |
| Bordeaux |
| France |
| Hospices Civils de Lyon | Lyon | France |
| CHU Marseille | Marseille | 13005 | France |
| CHU de Nice | Nice | France |
| CHU de Rouen | Rouen | France |
| CHU de Strasbourg | Strasbourg | France |
| CHU de Toulouse | Toulouse | France |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010300 | Parkinson Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020734 | Parkinsonian Disorders |
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D000080874 | Synucleinopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided