Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| New Jersey Health Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Each year, over 3.5 million, mostly, healthy young adults, have their third molar teeth ('wisdom teeth') removed under sedation and are often given opioid prescriptions for managing their pain. Wisdom molar removal is one of the most common reasons for opioid prescriptions to be given to adolescents. There is a national thrust to reduce both the dose and the duration of such opioid prescriptions because even short-term opioid exposures increase risk for narcotic addiction and misuse. Non-opioid options to manage pain will still allow for sufficient pain control without risking addiction, and hence, a fundamental component of our response to combat the current national opioid crisis.
The investigators are going to study a promising option- the Twin Block dental anesthetic injection. The Twin block involves injecting the standard dental numbing medication in a way that 'numbs' the 'jaw-clencher' muscles on the side of the face. The investigators found that the Twin block relieved jaw pain stemming from these muscles, in a quick and sustained manner, even in patients whose pain following wisdom tooth removal primarily came from 'taut' and tender jaw-clencher muscles. However, what is not known is- how often do patients who have their wisdom teeth removed under sedation, end up in significant pain from taut and tender jaw-clencher muscles? Will using the twin block effectively reduce pain in such patients? In this pilot study, the investigators will examine wisdom molar extraction patients one day after their procedure. Those with significant pain (pain rated ≥ 5 on a 0-10 scale) in their jaw-clencher muscles, will get either the Twin block injection or a placebo. The investigators will track both 1) pain before and after the injection, and 2) pain medication usage over a 7-day period to see if both pain and opioid dosage come down with the Twin block. This study can support a simple, safe and inexpensive means to reduce pain after a common procedure.
Annually, over 3.5 million predominantly young and healthy individuals undergo outpatient third molar tooth extractions and routinely receive postoperative opioid prescription (Moore, Nahouraii et al. 2006). This procedure is among the most prevalent instances of opioid prescriptions to adolescents and is the subject of a national debate, given the CDC's mandate for minimizing the number and duration of opioid prescriptions (Volkow, McLellan et al. 2011, Dowell, Haegerich et al. 2016, Moore, Dionne et al. 2016). Targeting such a prevalent practice by supplementing postoperative analgesia with non-opioid options as well as optimizing and tracking opioid usage will significantly reduce prescription opioid use/misuse. The Twin Block is a local anesthetic nerve block that eases muscle pain emanating from the jaw muscles and has been anecdotally shown to be effective in relieving post-operative pain in patients who developed muscle pain following third molar extractions. However, the incidence of acute muscle pain following third molar extractions is not well established. Accordingly, the aims of this study are two-fold:
A. Objectives This study has 2 objectives: 1) To estimate the incidence of acute muscle pain involving the temporalis and masseter muscles (the jaw closer muscles that are commonly implicated in resulting in jaw muscle pain), following third molar extractions and 2) Conduct a double-blind prospective study to compare the efficacy of Twin Block in relieving postextraction pain in those patients determined to experience muscle pain following the procedure B. Hypotheses / Research Question(s) Hypothesis 1: The incidence of post-third molar extraction muscle pain is at least 40% Hypothesis 2: Twin block reduces post-extraction muscle pain by 50% 1.2 Research Significance The twin block is a simple and effective local anesthetic nerve block for 'numbing' the innervation to the masseter and temporalis muscles, two key jaw clencher muscles, with emerging data corroborating efficacy in the diagnosis and management of both acute and chronic myogenous orofacial pain (Quek, Young et al. 2014, Ananthan et al. 2017). 1.3 Research Design and Methods The study is designed as a prospective evaluation of patients undergoing third molar extractions under intravenous sedation to identify those developing post-extraction muscle pain on the day following the procedure. Subsequently, such patients will be prospectively randomized to receive the Twin block to deliver either the dental local anesthetic or saline as a placebo. Post-injection muscle pain will be evaluated 15 minutes following the administration of the injection. All patients will be provided similar directions and prescriptions for pain management. All patients will be contacted to document/report their daily pain medications and queried one week after the extraction/s for their overall pain experience and any adverse effects from the injection.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Block with Local Anesthetic | Active Comparator | Following lower third molar extraction under intravenous sedation, the patient randomized to this arm with receive the Twin block local anesthetic nerve block using the standard dental local anesthetic, i.e,. 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, on the day after extraction, if the patient has pain greater than or equal to 5 on 10 in their jaw-closer muscles (Numerical Pain rating scale). |
|
| Twin Block with sterile normal saline | Placebo Comparator | Following lower third molar extraction under intravenous sedation, the patient randomized to this arm with receive the Twin block using sterile normal saline, on the day after extraction, if the patient has pain greater than or equal to 5 on 10 in their jaw-closer muscles (Numerical Pain rating scale). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twin block local anesthetic nerve block using standard dental anesthetic | Drug | 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine is the standard dental local anesthetic in universal use. This drug will be administered as the Twin block local anesthetic nerve block targeting the branches of the mandibular nerve supplying the temporalis and masseter muscles. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Post-injection muscle pain | NRS pain scores before and 15 min after Twin block administration on day after procedure | 15 minutes |
| Mean NRS pain score | Means NRS pain score by Day, comparing placebo and Twin block groups | one week |
| Total prescription opioid consumption | Comparison of total prescription opioid consumption (mg) between placebo and Twin block groups | one week |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Passive mouth opening | Comparison of passive mouth opening before and 15 min after Twin block administration on day after procedure | 15 min |
| Passive mouth opening | Comparison of baseline and end-of-study passive mouth opening between Twin block and placebo groups |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
All patients requiring extraction/s of at least 1 lower wisdom (third) molar that is partially/fully 'impacted', under intravenous sedation, are eligible to participate in this study so long as they
Exclusion Criteria:
Any patients, even if satisfying the criteria above, may not take part if they have any of the following:
As reported by participant
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gayathri Subramanian, PhD, DMD | Contact | 973 972 3418 | subramga@sdm.rutgers.edu | |
| Brahmleen Kaur, DMD | Contact | 973 972 3126 | bk466@sdm.rutgers.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gayathri Subramanian, PhD, DMD | Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark NJ | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rutgers School of Dental Medicine | Recruiting | Newark | New Jersey | 07103 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24703404 | Background | Quek S, Young A, Subramanian G. The twin block: a simple technique to block both the masseteric and the anterior deep temporal nerves with one anesthetic injection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014 Sep;118(3):e65-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.01.227. Epub 2014 Feb 6. | |
| 32633773 | Result | Quek SYP, Gomes-Zagury J, Subramanian G. Twin Block in Myogenous Orofacial Pain: Applied Anatomy, Technique Update, and Safety. Anesth Prog. 2020 Jun 1;67(2):103-106. doi: 10.2344/anpr-67-01-03. |
Not provided
Not provided
After anonymizing, IPD will be shared after the study is completed.
After study completion, upon review of request
A written request will be evaluated and responded to.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059787 | Acute Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Triple blind, randomized prospective pilot study comparing post wisdom molar extraction pain comparing placebo or Twin block local anesthetic nerve block injection
Not provided
Not provided
The patient, Twin block administrator and assessor assessing jaw muscle pain will all be unaware of whether the patient received sterile saline (placebo) or local anesthetic in the Twin Block injection.
|
| Twin block with placebo | Other | Instead of the standard dental anesthetic, sterile normal saline will be delivered using the Twin block injection |
|
| one week |
| 28990015 | Result | Kanti V, Ananthan S, Subramanian G, Quek SYP. Efficacy of the twin block, a peripheral nerve block for the management of chronic masticatory myofascial pain: A case series. Quintessence Int. 2017 Oct 6:725-729. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a39094. Online ahead of print. |