Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Medline Industries | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to test the following hypotheses:
Surfactant-based wound dressings have been utilized in chronic, non-healing wounds and small burn wounds to soften and aid removal of wound debris. In vitro data suggest enhanced healing properties are due the ability to stabilize and potentially reseal plasma membranes, thereby, retaining cellular integrity and enhance wound healing. Improved cellular viability and functionality has also been established in heat-shock, ionizing radiation, and electrical injury models. In one rat model, topically suffused mesentery demonstrated improved microvascular flow and reduction in the number of abnormally flowing microvessels following thermal injury. Intravenous administration has been studied in several disease states. In thermal injury, intravenous administration has shown potential to improve blood flow and reduce the zone of coagulation. Further, surfactant-based wound dressings are non-ionic and may facilitate removal, sensitize, or prevent bacterial biofilms. Biofilms are an evolved, protective mechanism bacteria utilize to reduce antimicrobial efficacy. Removal or penetration of biofilms is essential for bacterial eradication. There is little evidence demonstrating the efficacy of early use of a WSD for treating partial-thickness burn wounds.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Dressed with WSD and petrolatum gauze |
|
| Control | Active Comparator | Dressed with bacitracin and petrolatum gauze |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSD | Device | Post debridement and within 24 hours of injury, wound care and WSD applied daily |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent difference (cm2) in partial-thickness wound conversion | Tissue salvage | Up to 14 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to 95% re-epithelialization | Healing time | Up to 28 days |
| Daily pain scores for each wound care session | Pain via Numeric Rating Scale (0-10; 0 having no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regional One Health | Memphis | Tennessee | 38103 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27428718 | Background | Palumbo FP, Harding KG, Abbritti F, Bradbury S, Cech JD, Ivins N, Klein D, Menzinger G, Meuleneire F, Seratoni S, Zolss C, Mayer D. New Surfactant-based Dressing Product to Improve Wound Closure Rates of Nonhealing Wounds: A European Multicenter Study Including 1036 Patients. Wounds. 2016 Jul;28(7):233-40. | |
| 18434836 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002056 | Burns |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Dressed with bacitracin and petrolatum gauze | Device | Post debridement and within 24 hours of injury, wound care and dressing applied daily |
|
| Up to 7 days |
| Incidence of burn wound infection and cellulitis | Infection up to day of initial excision or day of discharge | Up to 28 days |
| Hospital costs | Cost of care during inpatient stay | Up to 28 days |
| Birchenough SA, Rodeheaver GT, Morgan RF, Peirce SM, Katz AJ. Topical poloxamer-188 improves blood flow following thermal injury in rat mesenteric microvasculature. Ann Plast Surg. 2008 May;60(5):584-8. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181651661. |
| 7436067 | Background | Rodeheaver GT, Kurtz L, Kircher BJ, Edlich RF. Pluronic F-68: a promising new skin wound cleanser. Ann Emerg Med. 1980 Nov;9(11):572-6. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(80)80228-9. |
| 30895731 | Background | Chen R, Salisbury AM, Percival SL. In vitro cellular viability studies on a concentrated surfactant-based wound dressing. Int Wound J. 2019 Jun;16(3):703-712. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13084. Epub 2019 Mar 20. |
| 16533934 | Background | Maskarinec SA, Wu G, Lee KY. Membrane sealing by polymers. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Dec;1066:310-20. doi: 10.1196/annals.1363.018. |
| 10842638 | Background | Lee RC, Hannig J, Matthews KL, Myerov A, Chen CT. Pharmaceutical therapies for sealing of permeabilized cell membranes in electrical injuries. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Oct 30;888:266-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb07961.x. |
| 1584787 | Background | Lee RC, River LP, Pan FS, Ji L, Wollmann RL. Surfactant-induced sealing of electropermeabilized skeletal muscle membranes in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 May 15;89(10):4524-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4524. |
| 16533935 | Background | Walsh AM, Mustafi D, Makinen MW, Lee RC. A surfactant copolymer facilitates functional recovery of heat-denatured lysozyme. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005 Dec;1066:321-7. doi: 10.1196/annals.1363.029. |
| 15302418 | Background | Greenebaum B, Blossfield K, Hannig J, Carrillo CS, Beckett MA, Weichselbaum RR, Lee RC. Poloxamer 188 prevents acute necrosis of adult skeletal muscle cells following high-dose irradiation. Burns. 2004 Sep;30(6):539-47. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.02.009. |
| 11676555 | Background | Baskaran H, Toner M, Yarmush ML, Berthiaume F. Poloxamer-188 improves capillary blood flow and tissue viability in a cutaneous burn wound. J Surg Res. 2001 Nov;101(1):56-61. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2001.6262. |
| 29931339 | Background | Yang Q, Schultz GS, Gibson DJ. A Surfactant-Based Dressing to Treat and Prevent Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilms. J Burn Care Res. 2018 Aug 17;39(5):766-770. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irx041. |
| 27212453 | Background | Yang Q, Larose C, Della Porta AC, Schultz GS, Gibson DJ. A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model. Int Wound J. 2017 Apr;14(2):408-413. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12619. Epub 2016 May 22. |
| 30335643 | Background | Salisbury AM, Percival SL. Efficacy of a Surfactant-Based Wound Dressing in the Prevention of Biofilms. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018 Nov;31(11):514-520. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000544612.28804.34. |
| 30204575 | Background | Mayer D, Armstrong D, Schultz G, Percival S, Malone M, Romanelli M, Keast D, Jeffery S. Cell salvage in acute and chronic wounds: a potential treatment strategy. Experimental data and early clinical results. J Wound Care. 2018 Sep 2;27(9):594-605. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2018.27.9.594. |
| 32530755 | Background | Pittinger TP, Curran D, Hermans MH. The treatment of paediatric burns with concentrated surfactant gel technology: a case series. J Wound Care. 2020 Jun 1;29(Sup6):S12-S17. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2020.29.Sup6.S12. |
| 33472159 | Background | Pittinger T, Curran D, Hermans M. Treatment of Burns in Adult Patients With a Concentrated Surfactant Gel: A Real-life Retrospective Evaluation. Wounds. 2020 Dec;32(12):339-344. |
| 31166855 | Background | Kirsner RS, Amaya R, Bass K, Boyar V, Ciprandi G, Glat PM, Percival SL, Romanelli M, Pittinger TP. Effects of a surfactant-based gel on acute and chronic paediatric wounds: a panel discussion and case series. J Wound Care. 2019 Jun 2;28(6):398-408. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.6.398. |