Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Regorafenib has demonstrated a significant benefit in overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, more than 50% of patients had severe adverse events (grade 3-4), leading to temporary or definitive discontinuation of treatment.
The RePERSO study proposes to adapt the regorafenib dose regimen taking into account firstly the measurement of sum of metabolites M-2 and M-5 and secondly the occurrence of toxicity during treatment. This treatment personalization through therapeutic drug monitoring pharmacological dosing optimization strategy aims at validating the proof of concept of regorafenib therapeutic drug monitoring and at improving the benefit in OS in patients, using the previously defined Csum therapeutic range.
Regorafenib has demonstrated in two multicenter phase III randomized clinical trials a significant benefit in overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with regorafenib at 160mg/day 3 weeks/4 (3w/4). However, more than 50% of patients had severe adverse events (grade 3-4), leading to temporary or definitive discontinuation of treatment in 2/3 of the patients and a reduction of the dosing in 20% of them. Thus, a part of the therapeutic failures could be explained by an insufficient exposure to regorafenib because of an early toxicity potentially linked to an initial overexposure. The recent randomized phase II ReDOS study has shown that a gradual increase in the dose of regorafenib (from 80 mg to 160 mg/day 3w/4) led to a significantly greater proportion of patients starting a third cycle of regorafenib and showed a trend toward improvement in overall survival of patients when compared to the standard administration schedule (160 mg/day 3 w/4). These results favored the dose-escalation strategy. However, due to the low correlation between dose and concentration, a concentration-controlled study might be of better relevance.
Regorafenib pharmacokinetics is characterized by a hepatic metabolism leading to the production of two main pharmacologically active metabolites (M-2 and M-5) that may induce therapeutic and adverse effects. The production of these metabolites shows a large inter-individual variability. Pharmacokinetic data from phase III studies have suggested the existence of a relationship between exposure to regorafenib and its metabolites and the occurrence of some therapeutic and adverse effects. In an ancillary pharmacokinetic study of the phase II prospective TEXCAN study in which regorafenib was evaluated in its mCRC indication, it was shown a major benefit in OS in patients with an accumulation of M-2 between the first (C1) and the second (C2) cycle of regorafenib (M2 C2/C1). A significant correlation between M-2 C2/C1 ratio and the sum of trough concentrations of regorafenib, M-2 and M-5 measured at D15C1 (C Sum (Rego+M-2+M-5)) was found, which could be a pharmacological marker of efficacy, earlier than the M-2 C2/C1 ratio. The assessment of the relationship between C Sum and in OS according to a Restricted Cubic Spline analysis showed that the benefit is optimal for a concentration between 2.5 mg/L and 5.5 mg/L (median OS of 10.6 months versus 3.3 and 4.0 months in patients with a concentration <2.5 mg/L and ≥5.5 mg/L, respectively). The rate of serious adverse events was also lower in the group in the range [≥2.5; <5.5 mg/L] (0% vs 43% and 20% respectively). This interval seems to allow limiting the severe toxicities that cause treatment discontinuations and/or early progressions that could explain the over-risk of death when the concentrations are outside.
The RePERSO study proposes to adapt the regorafenib dose regimen taking into account firstly the measurement of Csum and secondly the occurrence of toxicity during treatment. This treatment personalization through therapeutic drug monitoring pharmacological dosing optimization strategy aims at validating the proof of concept of regorafenib therapeutic drug monitoring and at improving the benefit in OS in patients, using the previously defined Csum therapeutic range.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | Experimental | Patients |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regorafenib | Drug | Dose adaptation at the beginning of cycle 2 and cycle 3 after regorafenib dosage at day 15 |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time from inclusion to death | Determine whether "optimal exposure" to regorafenib based on plasma concentration of the drug and its metabolites can improve overall survival in mCRC patients | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ten months survival rate | Percentage of patients alive 10 months after inclusion | 10 months |
| Objective response Rate | Objective response Rate (ORR) defined as the rate of patients with complete or partial response |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
- Signed and dated informed consent
Male or female patients ≥ 18 years-old at time of Informed Consent Form (ICF) signature
Patients must have a histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer
Patients who have previously been treated with standard therapy including a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, an anti-VEGF (bevacizumab or aflibercept) and an anti-EGFR (cetuximab or panitumumab) for patients who had a RAS wild-type tumor
In mCRC with MSI-H, the patient must have received immunotherapy. For mCRC with BRAF mutation, the patient should have received a BRAF inhibitor if eligible.
ECOG PS = 0 or 1
Imaging target greater than one cm must be visible on CT
Patients must have adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function, as evidenced by the pre-therapeutic check-up performed within 7 days before regorafenib initiation: Normal organ functions as defined below :
INR/PTT ≤1.5 x ULN
Patient who are therapeutically treated with an agent such as warfarin or heparin will be allowed to participate provided that no prior evidence of underlying abnormality in coagulation parameters exists. For patients treated with VKA, close monitoring of at least weekly evaluations will be performed until INR/PTT is stable based on a measurement that is pre-dose as defined by the local standard of care
Women of childbearing potential and male patients must agree to use adequate contraception for the duration of study participation and up to 3 months following completion of therapy
Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum β-HCG pregnancy test within 7 days prior randomization
Patients must be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures
Patients affiliated to the Social Security System
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Caen | Caen | France | ||||
| AP-HP Henri Mondor |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 12 months |
| Disease Control Rate | Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as the rate of patients with complete response, partial response or stable disease, | 12 months |
| Progression-free survival | Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from inclusion to date of first observed disease progression (radiological or clinical) or death due to any cause, if death occurs before progression is documented. The actual date that the tumor scan was performed will be used for this calculation. PFS for patients without disease progression or death at the time of analysis will be censored at the last date of tumor evaluation. | 12 months |
| Severe toxicities | Percentage of patients with significant toxicities (≥ grade 3). Adverse events will be assessed from inclusion to 28 day after the discontinuation of the study drug and classified according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 5.0. | 12 months |
| Percentage of optimal exposure | Percentage of patients with "optimal exposure" - i.e. with Csum at day 15 within the range [2.5 - 5.5 mg/L]) - at cycle 1 and cycle 2 | 2 months |
| Difference in overall survival between patient with different metabolite 2 plasma ratio | Overall survival for the half of patients with a low ratio of plasma concentration of Metabolite 2 Cycle2/Ccyle1 compared to the overall survival for the half of patients with a high ratio of plasma concentration of Metabolite 2 Cycle2/Cycle1 | 2 months |
| Genetic polymorphism impact | Genetic polymorphisms in gene involved in regorafenib metabolism and plasma concentrations of regorafenib and its metabolites | 12 months |
| Body composition | Body composition will be determined on Computerized Tomography scan (CT-scan) imaging done at baseline and for tumor response evaluation during treatment. | 12 months |
| Créteil |
| France |
| Institut Daniel Hollard, Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble | Grenoble | France |
| CHU Nantes | Nantes | France |
| AP-HP St Antoine | Paris | France |
| Centre Eugène Marquis | Rennes | France |
| CHU Rennes | Rennes | France |
| CHU Rouen | Rouen | France |
| CHU Tours | Tours | France |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C559147 | regorafenib |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided