Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multi-center, prospective double-blind randomized controlled pivotal study of noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation (NPNS) with the NTX100 Neuromodulation System for patients with medication-refractory moderate-severe primary RLS
The study consists of a series of two 4-week phases:
Phase 1: Prospective, double-blinded, 1:1 randomized (Active treatment: Sham control)
Phase 2: Prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded, Active treatment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active neurostimulation | Active Comparator | Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to deliver active stimulation - Phase 1 |
|
| Sham neurostimulation | Sham Comparator | Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to deliver non-therapeutic (sham) stimulation - Phase 1 |
|
| Open-Label | Active Comparator | Open-Label - Phase 2 lasting 4-wks, during which all subjects will receive open-label Active treatment |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTX100 Neuromodulation System - Active | Device | Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to active mode. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Subjects for Which the Clinician Reported "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale for TOMAC Compared to Sham | Responder rate is defined as the proportion of responses of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" relative to baseline on the investigator-rated 7-point CGI-I scale. | Week 4 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Responder Rate on Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale | Responder rate is defined as the proportion of responses of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" relative to baseline on the participant-rated 7-point PGI-I scale. | Week 4 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject has RLS that is known to be caused by another diagnosed condition (i.e. secondary RLS).
Subject is taking an unstable or inconsistent dose or schedule of medication that is likely to impact RLS symptoms, such as antidepressants, sleep medications, or sedative antihistamines or has changed dosage within the past 30 days.
Subject has changed dose and schedule of RLS medications within the month prior to study entry or is otherwise on an inconsistent dose or schedule of RLS medications.
Subject reports having significant prior experience with neurostimulation devices (including but not limited to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) devices) or subject has prior experience with neurostimulation devices developed by the study sponsor.
Subject was misdiagnosed with RLS, as determined by the investigator (e.g. actual diagnosis of Periodic Limb Movement Disorder (PLMD), arthritis, leg spasms or neuropathy without comorbid RLS).
Subject has a sleep disorder other than RLS that interferes with sleep at the present time (except for obstructive sleep apnea that is stably controlled via Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)).
Subject has active medical device implant anywhere in the body (including but not limited to pacemakers, spinal cord stimulators, deep brain stimulators) or metal implant in the leg.
Subject has failed a nerve conduction study prescribed by a physician or has been diagnosed with severe peripheral neuropathy.
Subject reports that bedtime is typically outside of 9pm-3am or reports that bedtime regularly varies by more than 4 hours, such as due to shift work.
On nights with no RLS symptoms (if any), subject reports typical sleep onset latency of >60min.
Subject has been diagnosed with one of the following conditions:
Subject has moderate or severe cognitive disorder or mental illness.
Subject has current diagnosis of iron-deficient anemia or history of iron-deficient anemia within the past year.
Subject has known allergy to device materials, electrode gel, polyurethane foam, or lycra (or severe previous reaction to medical adhesives or bandages).
Subject has severe edema affecting lower legs.
Subject has any of the following at or near the location of device application.
Subject is on dialysis or anticipated to start dialysis while participating in the study.
During the NTX100 calibration process, which is identical for subjects in the active and sham arms, subject reports not feeling stimulation sensations up to an intensity of 30mA or finds stimulation intensities less than 15 milliamperes (mA) to be uncomfortable or distracting.
Subject has received another investigational device or drug within 30 days before study entry, is planning to receive another investigational device or drug during the study, or is planning to change RLS medications during the study.
Subject has undergone a major surgery (excluding dental work) in the 30 days prior to study entry.
Subject is unable or unwilling to comply with study requirements.
Subject is pregnant or trying to become pregnant.
Subject has a medical condition not listed above that may affect validity of the study as determined by the investigator.
Subject has a medical condition not listed above that may put the subject at risk as determined by the investigator
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan D Charlesworth, PhD | Noctrix Health, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California Center for Sleep Disorders | San Leandro | California | 94578 | United States | ||
| Delta Waves, Inc. |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37458698 | Derived | Bogan RK, Roy A, Kram J, Ojile J, Rosenberg R, Hudson JD, Scheuller HS, Winkelman JW, Charlesworth JD. Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Sleep. 2023 Oct 11;46(10):zsad190. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsad190. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects must have received a medical diagnosis of primary restless legs syndrome (RLS), have moderate-severe RLS and be refractory to RLS medication.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | TOMAC Group | Stage 1 (4 weeks): Double-blind, Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to deliver active stimulation Stage 2 (4 weeks): Open-label, noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to active mode. |
| FG001 | Sham Control Group |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jun 15, 2021 | Nov 27, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Study consists of two phases. Phase 1: Randomized 1:1 between Active treatment and Sham control Phase 2: Non-randomized, Active treatment
Not provided
Not provided
Double-blind
| NTX100 Neuromodulation System - Sham | Device | Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to sham mode. |
|
| NTX100 Neuromodulation System - Open-Label | Device | Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to active mode. |
|
IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe. |
| Week 4 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index II (MOS-II) Score | MOS-II is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. See https://labs.dgsom.ucla.edu/hays/files/view/docs/surveys/sleep/sleepman-112603.pdf for more information. | Week 4 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index I (MOS-I) Score | MOS-I is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. See https://labs.dgsom.ucla.edu/hays/files/view/docs/surveys/sleep/sleepman-112603.pdf for more information. | Week 4 |
| Mean Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Rating | Mean rating on the investigator-rated 7-point Likert CGI-I scale, where lower scores indicate improvement. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). | Week 4 |
| Score for Question #7 of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) | Question #7 of the IRLS assesses the participant-rated frequency (days/week) of RLS symptoms on a scale from 0 to 4, where lower scores indicate less frequent symptoms | Week 8 |
| Colorado Springs |
| Colorado |
| 95125 |
| United States |
| Neurotrials Research | Atlanta | Georgia | 30328 | United States |
| Clayton Sleep Institute | St Louis | Missouri | 63123 | United States |
| Ohio Sleep Medicine Institute | Dublin | Ohio | 43017 | United States |
| Bogan Sleep Consultants, LLC | Columbia | South Carolina | 29201 | United States |
| FutureSearch Trials of Neurology | Austin | Texas | 78731 | United States |
Stage 1 (4 weeks): Double-blind, Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to deliver SHAM stimulation Stage 2 (4 weeks): Open-label, noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to active mode. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | TOMAC Group | Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to deliver active stimulation - Phase 1 NTX100 Neuromodulation System - Active: Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to active mode. |
| BG001 | Sham Control Group | Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to deliver non-therapeutic (sham) stimulation - Phase 1 NTX100 Neuromodulation System - Sham: Noninvasive peripheral nerve stimulation device programmed to sham mode. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| IRLS Total Score at Baseline | International Restless Legs Score (IRLS) is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Subjects for Which the Clinician Reported "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" on the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale for TOMAC Compared to Sham | Responder rate is defined as the proportion of responses of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" relative to baseline on the investigator-rated 7-point CGI-I scale. | Primary Efficacy Endpoint (CGI-I Responder Rate at Week 4) - (ITT Population) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 4 |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Responder Rate on Patient Global Impressions-Improvement (PGI-I) Scale | Responder rate is defined as the proportion of responses of "Much Improved" or "Very Much Improved" relative to baseline on the participant-rated 7-point PGI-I scale. | Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoints (ITT Population) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) Score | IRLS is a participant-rated questionnaire that rates RLS severity from 0-40, where 40 is the most severe. | Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoints (ITT Population) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Week 4 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index II (MOS-II) Score | MOS-II is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. See https://labs.dgsom.ucla.edu/hays/files/view/docs/surveys/sleep/sleepman-112603.pdf for more information. | Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoints (ITT Population) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Week 4 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Problems Index I (MOS-I) Score | MOS-I is a subscale of the participant-rated MOS questionnaire that measures subjective sleep quality. The MOS-I (6-items) and MOS-II (9-items) are the two validated subscales of the 12-item MOS Sleep Scale. Both are scored from 0 to 100, where 100 corresponds to the worst possible sleep problems and 0 corresponds to no sleep problems. See https://labs.dgsom.ucla.edu/hays/files/view/docs/surveys/sleep/sleepman-112603.pdf for more information. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Week 4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Rating | Mean rating on the investigator-rated 7-point Likert CGI-I scale, where lower scores indicate improvement. Possible choices (followed by scale value) are: Very much improved (1), Much improved (2), Minimally improved (3), No change (4), Minimally worse (5), Much worse (6), Very Much Worse (7). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Week 4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Score for Question #7 of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) | Question #7 of the IRLS assesses the participant-rated frequency (days/week) of RLS symptoms on a scale from 0 to 4, where lower scores indicate less frequent symptoms | Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoints (ITT Population) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Days per Week | Week 8 |
|
|
8 weeks
Descriptive analyses of adverse events for both study arms, classified and tabulated by seriousness, relationship to the device, and severity.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | TOMAC Group | Treatment group | 0 | 68 | 0 | 68 | 28 | 68 |
| EG001 | Sham Control Group | Control group | 0 | 65 | 0 | 65 | 23 | 65 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration site discomfort | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Administration site irritation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Charlesworth, PhD | Noctrix Health, Inc. | 804-683-4279 | jcharlesworth@noctrixhealth.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 19, 2022 | Nov 27, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012148 | Restless Legs Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020919 | Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic |
| D020920 | Dyssomnias |
| D012893 | Sleep Wake Disorders |
| D020447 | Parasomnias |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|