Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Eli Lilly and Company | INDUSTRY |
| Biogen | INDUSTRY |
| Ministry for Health and Solidarity, France | OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
As stated by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the Société Française de Rhumatologie (SFR), treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) should target sustained remission or at least low disease activity. However, despite significant advances based on various combinations of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs, RA therapies meet treatment goals only in some patients:
Therefore, new strategies targeted at achieving a higher percentage of remission are needed, that do not require waiting for multiple failed therapies. Combinations of biologics have shown synergistic improvement of symptoms in murine models of RA relative to the improvement observed with either agent alone. However, in RA patients, only five randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have explored the efficacy and safety of combining tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor with another biologic (anakinra, abatacept, rituximab or bimekizumab).
Baricitinib is a selective, reversible and competitive inhibitor of Janus kinases (Jaki). This treatment is efficient in a number of therapeutic scenarios in RA and showed a clinical superiority over adalimumab in one RCT (RA-BEAM study in MTX inadequate responders). Of note, baricitinib inhibits many of the pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in the pathogenesis of RA but does not block signalling downstream of TNF. Owing to the interest in combining different mechanisms of action, the investigators plan to assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with baricitinib and a TNF inhibitor. The investigators are aware that combining targeted therapies is not recommended due to a potential increase in the frequency of serious adverse events. However, several case series on patients treated with a combination of targeted therapies have been published, suggesting a certain efficacy in patients with refractory RA. The first ones focused on inflammatory bowel diseases and psoriasis, but more recently, combination of tofacitinib (which belongs to the same Jaki family as baricitinib) with various biologics has been reported in a sample of RA patients. No serious adverse effects were reported over a mean of approximately 11 months of therapy. The clinical improvement was mild but noticeable in these refractory RA cases.
Recently, data of interest from the RA-BEAM study have been reported. Patients who switched from adalimumab to baricitinib showed improvements in disease control. Because the switch from adalimumab to baricitinib occurred without a washout period, and because adalimumab has a mean circulating half-life of approximately 14 days, patients would have received several weeks of dual TNF and Jak1/Jak2 inhibition in the course of the change of treatment. The observation of increased efficacy, with no apparent acute safety issues during the weeks when patients were exposed to both adalimumab and baricitinib, is of interest, and supports our strategy to combine the two treatments for patients with refractory RA.
The investigators consider that there is a need for investigation into the addition of anti-TNF to baricitinib in patients suffering of refractory RA (inadequate response to TNF inhibitors). The investigators hypothesize that in this population, based on ACR50 score, this combination therapy will decrease disease activity more efficiently than a switch to another targeted DMARD, such as baricitinib.
Intensive combination therapies have revolutionised the management of solid neoplasms, hematologic malignancies, and acquired-immune-deficiency syndrome. These intensive strategies are based on the need to obtain rapid control of disease activity to afford the chance of stable full remission and avoid irreversible complications. The same goal applies to management of RA. Because current therapeutic strategies may fall short of these target goals and fail to improve quality of life in some patients, novel approaches are needed to improve outcomes. RA is a complex disease involving numerous cell types and inflammatory mediators of innate and adaptive immune systems. The investigators are aware that most of combination bDMARD strategies have been associated with little or no incremental benefit in efficacy compared to single-biologic therapy. However, our study will target mechanisms that differ from those in previous studies. Strategies that simultaneously target different pathways involved in the pathogenesis of RA may enhance treatment responses in patients with RA. Of note, baricitinib does not directly block signalling downstream of TNF, even if an indirect effect on TNF production is likely to occur. Targeting multiple inflammatory cytokines in combination may lead to more effective treatment and enhanced clinical responses in patients with RA compared to the current second-line strategies. The different mechanisms of action of baricitinib and anti-TNF, should ensure the efficacy of the combination. No concurrent trial evaluating similar strategies is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Period A : baricitinib + anti-TNF | Experimental |
| |
| Period A : baricitinib + placebo | Placebo Comparator |
| |
| Period B : baricitinib + anti-TNF | Experimental |
| |
| Period B : baricitinib | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| baricitinib treatment | Drug | 4 mg daily during 12 months |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients who achieve an ACR 50 response | in each treatment group (COMBI group (anti-TNF therapy + baricitinib) vs. MONO group (baricitinib conventional therapy)). | At weeks 24 after baseline |
| Quantitative change in DAS28-CRP | in each treatment group (COMBI group (anti-TNF therapy + baricitinib) vs. MONO group (baricitinib conventional therapy)). | At weeks 24 after baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) in each treatment group | weeks 52 after baseline (Day 0) | |
| Proportion of patients who achieve an ACR20 response in each treatment group | At weeks 4, 12 and 24 after baseline (Day 0) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Christophe RICHEZ, Prof | University Hospital, Bordeaux | Principal Investigator |
| Edouard LHOMME, MD | University Hospital, Bordeaux | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH de la Côte Basque - service de rhumatologie | Bayonne | France | ||||
| CH de Belfort - service de rhumatologie |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Period A : placebo-controlled trial *** Period B : controlled trial - study switch to an open-label design from the 17th August 2024
Not provided
Not provided
Period A : Participant / Care provider / Investigator *** Period B : An independent efficacy assessor will perform the joint evaluation, whereas the investigator will evaluate safety.
| anti-TNF therapy | Drug | adalimumab at 40 mg every 2 weeks or etanercept 50 mg per week according to treatments history |
|
| Placebo | Drug | 40 mg every 2 weeks during 6 months only during Period A |
|
| Proportion of patients who achieve an ACR70 response in each treatment group | At weeks 4, 12 and 24 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Proportion of patients who achieve an ACR50 response in each treatment group | At weeks 4 and 12 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Proportion of patients who present a EULAR response according to DAS28-ESR, in each treatment group | at weeks 4, 12 and 24 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Proportion of patients who achieve remission or low disease activity according to DAS28-ESR in each treatment group | at weeks 4, 12 and 24 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Quantitative change in DAS28-ESR score (Disease Activity Score on 28 joints using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) in each treatment group of treatment, varying from 0 to 9.55 with higher score means worse outcome. | between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included) |
| Quantitative change in DAS28-CRP score between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included) in each treatment group of treatment, varying from 0.96 to 9.04 with higher score means worse outcome. | Disease Activity Score on 28 joints using C-Reactive Protein level (DAS28-CRP) | between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included) |
| Quantitative change in sDAI score (simplified Disease Activity Index) between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included) in each treatment group of treatment, varying from 0 to 100 with higher score means worse outcome. | between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included) |
| Quantitative change in cDAI score (clinical Disease Activity Index) between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included) in each treatment group of treatment, varying from 0 to 76 with higher score means worse outcome. | between baseline and each visit (until week 24 included) |
| Proportion of patients who decrease the glucocorticosteroid dose ≤ 5 mg per day, sustained from week 12 to week 24, among patients with a baseline dose > 5 mg per day, in each treatment group. | At baseline (Day 0) and weeks 24 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Drug retention rates in each treatment group | at weeks 4, 12 and 24 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Quantitative change in patient-reported outcome in each treatment group Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), varying from 0 to 3 with higher score means worse outcome. | between baseline, weeks 4, 12 and 24 visit |
| Quantitative change in patient-reported outcome in each treatment group | Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACID) | between baseline, weeks 4, 12 and 24 visit |
| Quantitative change in patient-reported outcome in each treatment group Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease questionnaire (RAID), varying from 0 to 10 with higher score means worse status. | between baseline, weeks 4, 12 and 24 visit |
| Proportion of participants maintaining an ACR50 response, remission or low disease activity in each treatment group. | at week 52 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Quantitative change in DAS28-ESR score (Disease Activity Score on 28 joints using Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate) in each treatment group, varying from 0 to 9.55 with higher score means worse outcome. | between weeks 24 and 52 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Quantitative change in DAS28-CRP score (Disease Activity Score on 28 joints using C-Reactive Protein level) in each treatment group, varying from 0.96 to 9.04 with higher score means worse outcome | between weeks 24 and 52 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Quantitative change in sDAI score (simplified Disease Activity Index) in each treatment group, varying from 0 to 100 with higher score means worse outcome. | between weeks 24 and 52 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Quantitative change in cDAI score (clinical Disease Activity Index) in each treatment group, varying from 0 to 76 with higher score means worse outcome. | between weeks 24 and 52 after baseline (Day 0) |
| Belfort |
| France |
| AP-HP - Hopital Avicenne - service de rhumatologie | Bobigny | France |
| CHU de Bordeaux - service de rhumatologie | Bordeaux | France |
| CHU de Brest - Service de rhumatologie | Brest | France |
| Clinique de l'Infirmerie - service de rhumatologie | Caluire-et-Cuire | France |
| CHU de Clermont-Ferrand - service de rhumatologie | Clermont-Ferrand | France |
| CH de Dax - service de rhumatologie | Dax | France |
| CHD VENDEE - service de rhumatologie | La Roche-sur-Yon | France |
| AP-HP - Hôpital Kremlin-Bicêtre - service de rhumatologie | Le Kremlin-Bicêtre | France |
| CH du Mans - service de rhumatologie | Le Mans | France |
| CH Emile Roux - service rhumatologie | Le Puy-en-Velay | France |
| Polyclinique de Limoges - service de rhumatologie | Limoges | France |
| Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille - service de rhumatologie | Lomme | France |
| AP-HM - service de rhumatologie | Marseille | France |
| Hôpital Saint-Joseph - service de rhumatologie | Marseille | France |
| CHU de Montpellier - service de rhumatologie | Montpellier | France |
| CHU de Nice - service de rhumatologie | Nice | France |
| CH de Niort - service de rhumatologie | Niort | France |
| CHU de Nîmes - service de rhumatologie | Nîmes | France |
| Nouvel Hôpital Orléans La Source - service de rhumatologie | Orléans | France |
| AP-HP - Hôpital Bichat - service de rhumatologie | Paris | France |
| AP-HP - Hôpital Cochin - service de rhumatologie | Paris | France |
| AP-HP - Hôpital La Pitié-Salpetrière - service de rhumatologie | Paris | France |
| AP-HP - Hôpital Saint-Antoine - service de rhumatologie | Paris | France |
| CH de Pau - service de rhumatologie | Pau | France |
| Hospices Civils de Lyon - service de rhumatologie | Pierre-Bénite | France |
| Hopital NOVO - service de rhumatologie | Pontoise | France |
| CH de Reims - service de rhumatologie | Reims | France |
| CHU de Saint-Etienne- service de rhumatologie | Saint-Etienne | France |
| CH de Saint-Malo - service de rhumatologie | St-Malo | France |
| CHRU de Strasbourg - service de rhumatologie | Strasbourg | France |
| CHU de Toulouse - service de rhumatologie | Toulouse | France |
| CHRU du Tours - service de rhumtologie | Tours | France |
| CHRU de Nancy - service de rhumatologie | Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy | France |
| service de Rhumatologie - CH Princesse Grace | Monaco | Monaco |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided