Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| F.D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital with Policlinic Banska Bystrica | OTHER |
| Louis Pasteur University Hospital Kosice | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will test the hypothesis that inflammatory markers measured at 24 hours after breast cancer surgery will be lower in patients receiving PECS II and PIFB blocks, supplemented with dexmetomidine compared to standard care group.
Breast cancer is a devastating disease. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment which can lead to ongoing patient difficulties. Severe acute pain after surgery is one of major risk factors for developing persistent postsurgical pain. Subsequent physiological stress caused by this severe pain may negatively influence the immune response leading to a worse prognosis.
Regional anesthesia is very effective in management of peri- and postoperative pain. Epidural block, paravertebral block and intercostal nerve blocks have been proven over time to be effective in preventing postoperative pain. However, their widespread use has been hampered by technical difficulty and inherent risks.
Unlike the aforementioned blocks, novel thoracic wall blocks, namely modified pectoralis block (PECS II) and pecto-intercostal fascial block (PIFB) are safe, simple and effective.
Efforts to prolong and improve analgesia following single shot blocks has led to the introduction of adjuvants into the local anesthetic. Dexmetomidine is a superselective Alpha 2 agonist with a proven ability to prolong the duration of neuraxial, peripheral nerve and interfascial plane blocks.
Chronic inflammation is recognized as a risk factor for initiation, progression and further spread of malignant growth. Surgical insult leads to inflammatory response which facilitates the development of a metastatic disease. Many inflammatory markers were proven to be independent prognostic factors in breast cancer patients.
The investigators propose to study the impact of novel thoracic wall blocks with dexmetomidine on simple inflammatory markers obtained from full blood count (NLR, PLR, NPR, PDW, MPV, RDW) after breast cancer surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Block group | Experimental | Patients in a Block group will be anesthetized and receive PECS II+PIFB with dexmetomidine prior to their surgery. |
|
| Control group | No Intervention | Patients in a Control group will receive a standard general anesthesia the same way as patients in the interventional group but without regional anesthesia. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modified pectoralis block (PEC II) and pecto-intercostal fascial plane block (PIFB) | Procedure | PECS II: Ultrasound guided block involving injection of 20 ml of 0.25% L-bupivacaine with dexmetomidine into an interfascial plane between the serratus anterior muscle and the external intercostal muscles followed by the needle withdrawal into an interfascial plane between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscle where further 10ml will be administered. PIFB: Ultrasound guided block involving injection of 10 ml of 0.25% L-bupivacaine with dexmetomidine into an iterfascial plane between the pectoralis major and the intercostal muscles approximately 2 cm laterally from the sternum to cover T2 to T6 dermatomes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in NLR | Difference in neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) between the intervention group and the standard care group measured at 24 hours after breast cancer surgery | 24 hours after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Markers of inflammation | Difference in Δ NLR, PLR, NPR, PDW, MPV and RDW between the intervention group and the standard care group measured at 24 hours after breast cancer surgery | 24 hours after surgery |
| Intraoperative opioids |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adverse effects | Incidence of potential adverse effects | 24 hours |
| Postsurgical pain | Incidence of postsurgical pain at 1month, 2month and 3 months |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomas Hitka, MD | Contact | 00421902753979 | hitka@yahoo.com | |
| Roman Zahorec, MD | Contact | 00421 2 32249210 | roman.zahorec@ousa.sk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Tomas Hitka, MD | St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26742998 | Background | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7. | |
| 19453965 | Background | Fecho K, Miller NR, Merritt SA, Klauber-Demore N, Hultman CS, Blau WS. Acute and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery. Pain Med. 2009 May-Jun;10(4):708-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00611.x. Epub 2009 Apr 22. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
120 patients randomized into two groups of 60 patients. Group B (PECS II+PIFB with dexmetomidine) and Group C (control).
Not provided
Not provided
Intervention will be done under general anesthesia so participant will be blinded and primary outcome which will be laboratory test will be assessed by a person not aware of intervention.
|
Intraoperative consumption of opioids
| Duration of surgery |
| Pain after surgery | Numeric rating scale for pain (NRS, 0-10, where 0 means no pain and 10 the worst pain) at 0, 1h, 6h, 12h,18h,24h after surgery at rest and at ipsilateral arm abduction | 1,6,12,18,24 hours after surgery |
| Opioid consumption | Total opioid consumption after surgery at 24 h | 24 hours |
| 3 months after surgery |
| 21435953 | Background | Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011 Jul;12(7):725-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Mar 24. |
| 25721153 | Background | Lee SK, Choi MY, Bae SY, Lee JH, Lee HC, Kil WH, Lee JE, Kim SW, Nam SJ. Immediate postoperative inflammation is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. Oncology. 2015;88(6):337-44. doi: 10.1159/000368985. Epub 2015 Feb 25. |
| 27648890 | Background | Duff S, Connolly C, Buggy DJ. Adrenergic, Inflammatory, and Immune Function in the Setting of Oncological Surgery: Their Effects on Cancer Progression and the Role of the Anesthetic Technique in their Modulation. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2016 Fall;54(4):48-57. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000120. No abstract available. |
| 22058144 | Background | Freise H, Van Aken HK. Risks and benefits of thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107(6):859-68. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer339. Epub 2011 Nov 4. |
| 10825328 | Background | Klein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jun;90(6):1402-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00026. |
| 16573313 | Background | Kolawole IK, Adesina MD, Olaoye IO. Intercostal nerves block for mastectomy in two patients with advanced breast malignancy. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Mar;98(3):450-3. |
| 22939099 | Background | Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29. |
| 24396082 | Background | de la Torre PA, Garcia PD, Alvarez SL, Miguel FJ, Perez MF. A novel ultrasound-guided block: a promising alternative for breast analgesia. Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Jan 1;34(1):198-200. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13515902. No abstract available. |
| 27543533 | Background | Kulhari S, Bharti N, Bala I, Arora S, Singh G. Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):382-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew223. |
| 27258154 | Background | Marhofer P, Brummett CM. Safety and efficiency of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to local anesthetics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;29(5):632-7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000364. |
| 24317234 | Background | Fritsch G, Danninger T, Allerberger K, Tsodikov A, Felder TK, Kapeller M, Gerner P, Brummett CM. Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine extends the duration of interscalene brachial plexus blocks for elective shoulder surgery when compared with ropivacaine alone: a single-center, prospective, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):37-47. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000033. |
| 28528536 | Background | Xu L, Hu Z, Shen J, McQuillan PM. Efficacy of US-guided transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine in elderly high-risk patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jan;84(1):18-24. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11538-5. Epub 2017 May 19. |
| 21376230 | Background | Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. |
| 26022929 | Background | Koh CH, Bhoo-Pathy N, Ng KL, Jabir RS, Tan GH, See MH, Jamaris S, Taib NA. Utility of pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factors in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):150-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.183. Epub 2015 May 28. |
| 24675383 | Background | Krenn-Pilko S, Langsenlehner U, Thurner EM, Stojakovic T, Pichler M, Gerger A, Kapp KS, Langsenlehner T. The elevated preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2014 May 13;110(10):2524-30. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.163. Epub 2014 Mar 27. |
| 27926498 | Background | Hu L, Li M, Ding Y, Pu L, Liu J, Xie J, Cabanero M, Li J, Xiang R, Xiong S. Prognostic value of RDW in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 28;8(9):16027-16035. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13784. |
| 29457215 | Result | Ni Eochagain A, Burns D, Riedel B, Sessler DI, Buggy DJ. The effect of anaesthetic technique during primary breast cancer surgery on neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and return to intended oncological therapy. Anaesthesia. 2018 May;73(5):603-611. doi: 10.1111/anae.14207. Epub 2018 Feb 19. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided