Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A Prospective Randomized, Multi-centre, International, Open Label, Clinical trial comparing the Selution DEB strategy versus DES strategy.
Randomized, multi-centre, international, open label, clinical trial. Patients meeting eligibility criteria will be randomized 1:1 to treatment of all lesions of the identified trial target vessel(s) with either the SELUTION SLR DEB or DES.
Patients randomized to the SELUTION SLR DEB arm will receive lesion preparation according to the 3rd DCB consensus (optimal balloon angioplasty with adjunct treatment using high-pressure balloon, shockwave, rotational atherectomy or cutting or scoring balloon at the discretion of the operator when necessary to maximize lumen diameter). Patients with lesions that are then best treated by provisional stenting (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis > 30% or FFR < 0.8) before or after use of DEB will receive a DES but remain in the SELUTION DEB group (intention to treat analysis).
Patients randomized to the DES arm will receive treatment using any CE-marked DES, as per standard institutional practice. Patients with failure to deliver DES will be first treated by provisional DEB using the SELUTION DEB, and failing that, with any other device deemed appropriate.
Staged procedures are allowed if they are planned less than 45 days after the index procedure and are done according to the initial treatment allocation for all trial target vessels (DEB if DEB arm, DES if DES arm).
The study will test:
All Patients will be followed for clinical outcomes at 30 days, 6 months, 1 2, 3, 4 and 5 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SELUTION SLR DEB | Experimental | Device: SELUTION SLR DEB. For patients randomized to the DEB strategy, all target lesions should be treated with DEB after appropriate lesion preparation, but provisional DES implantation is acceptable if the angiographic result is considered insufficient either after lesion preparation of after DEB treatment (poor flow, dissection type C or higher, residual stenosis > 30%). For bifurcation lesions, when both main and side- branch are considered to require treatment, a DEB should be used for both. |
|
| DES | Other | Device: Drug Eluting Stent. For patients randomized to the DES strategy, all target lesions should be treated with DES, but use of a SELUTION SLR™ DEB or any other device is acceptable if a DES cannot be delivered to the target lesion. For bifurcation lesions, if the side-branch requires treatment it should be treated with another DES or with POBA, at the discretion of the operator, but not with a DEB. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SELUTION SLR | Device | Patients randomized to the SELUTION SLR™ DEB arm will receive lesion preparation according to the 3rd DCB consensus (optimal balloon angioplasty with adjunct treatment using high-pressure balloon, shockwave, rotational atherectomy or cutting or scoring balloon at the discretion of the operator when necessary to maximize lumen diameter). Patients with lesions that are then best treated by provisional stenting (flow-limiting dissection, residual stenosis > 30% or FFR < 0.8) before or after use of DEB will receive a DES but remain in the SELUTION SLR™ DEB group (intention to treat analysis). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| TVF | - TVF (cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction (MI) or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (cd-TVR) at 1 year | 1 year after treatment |
| TVF | - TVF (cardiac death, target-vessel related myocardial infarction (MI) or clinically driven target vessel revascularization (cd-TVR)) at 5 years | 5 years after treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Death or any MI | Cardiac death, non-cardiac death, or any Myocardial Infarction | 30 days after treatment |
| CD-TVR | Clinically driven - Target Vessel Revascularization |
Not provided
Subjects must meet all the following criteria to participate in the trial:
Exclusion Criteria:
Age < 18 years (or 21 according to countries legal age)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch | Feldkirch | Austria | ||||
| University Heart Center Graz |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42290366 | Derived | Spaulding C, Krackhardt F, Bogaerts K, Abdelaal E, Alfonso F, Briguori C, Bruch L, Cruden N, Den Hartog AW, Garot P, Godin M, Hildick-Smith D, Johnson T, Ladwiniec A, Linke A, Maart CA, Mashayekhi K, Meier P, Meunier L, Morgan K, O'Kane P, Puymirat E, Rissanen TT, Sabate M, Schmitz T, Toth GG, Trevelyan J, Wanczura P, Marcus W, Wykrzykowska JJ, Urban P, Eccleshall S; SELUTION DeNovo Investigators. Sirolimus-Eluting Balloon With Provisional Stenting Versus Systematic Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation to Treat De Novo Coronary Lesions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Noninferiority Trial. Circulation. 2026 Jun 15. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.126.079033. Online ahead of print. | |
| 36642225 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomised controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| DES | Device | For patients randomized to the DES strategy, all target lesions should be treated with DES, but use of a SELUTION SLR™ DEB or any other device is acceptable if a DES cannot be delivered to the target lesion. For bifurcation lesions, if the side-branch requires treatment it should be treated with another DES or with POBA, at the discretion of the operator, but not with a DEB. |
|
| 30 days after treatment |
| TVF | Target Vessel Failure | 2, 3, 4, 5 years after treatment |
| Any revascularization |
| 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Myocardial Infarction (MI) |
| 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Composite of cardiac death or target vessel MI | Composite of cardiac death or target vessel Myocardial Infarction | 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| All-cause mortality |
| 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Patient-oriented ARC-2 composite endpoint |
| 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Site-reported stroke | Site-reported stroke | 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Site-reported BARC 3-5 Bleeding | Site-reported BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ) 3-5 Bleeding | 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Cost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12 months in selected countries | Total costs of materials used during treatment | 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Cost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12 months in selected countries | Time of procedure. Total minutes from patient introducer introduction until removal | 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Cost-effectiveness of DEB vs. DES after 12 months in selected countries | Total hospitalization days per procedure. | 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Net clinical benefit, a combination of freedom from TVF and/or BARC 3-5 bleeding | Net clinical benefit, a combination of freedom from (Target Vessel Failure) TVF and/or BARC 3-5 bleeding | 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Device success | Device success defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of < 30% (site-reported), using the assigned device only | 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Lesion success | Lesion success defined as achievement of < 30% residual stenosis (site-reported), using any PCI method | 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Procedure success | Procedure success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of < 30% (site-reported) using any PCI method, without the occurrence of death, MI, or repeat target vessel revascularization during hospital stay | 30 days, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after treatment |
| Graz |
| Austria |
| Kepler Universitätsklinikum GmbH | Linz | Austria |
| University Hospital Brno | Brno | Czechia |
| University Hospital Ostrava | Ostrava | Czechia |
| SIUN sote Hospital and Healthcare center | Joensuu | Finland |
| CH La Rochelle | La Rochelle | France |
| Hôpital Jaques Cartier | Massy | France |
| CHU de Nîmes | Nîmes | France |
| Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou | Paris | France |
| Centre Hospitalier de Pau | Pau | France |
| Clinique Saint Hilaire | Rouen | France |
| Universitätsklinik Augsburg | Augsburg | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Freiburg | Bad Krozingen | Germany |
| BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin | Berlin | Germany |
| Charite Campus Virchow Klinikum | Berlin | Germany |
| Kardiologisch-Angiologische Praxis • Herzzentrum Bremen | Bremen | Germany |
| RKH Kliniken Bruchsal Fürst Stirum Klinik | Bruchsal | Germany |
| University Koeln | Cologne | Germany |
| Herzzentrum Dresden GmbH Universitätsklinik | Dresden | Germany |
| Elisabeth-Krankenhaus | Essen | Germany |
| Asklepios Kliniken GmbH & Co. | Hamburg | Germany |
| University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf | Hamburg | Germany |
| MEDICLIN Herzzentrum Lahr | Lahr | Germany |
| Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden | Minden | Germany |
| Herzklinikum Ulm | Ulm | Germany |
| Ospedale Civile Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo | Alessandria | Italy |
| Clinica Mediterranea | Naples | Italy |
| Ospedale Santa Croce di Moncalieri | Torino | Italy |
| Ospedale Sant'andrea | Vercelli | Italy |
| University Medical Center Amsterdam | Amsterdam | Netherlands |
| University Medical Center Groningen | Groningen | Netherlands |
| Tergooi MC | Hilversum | Netherlands |
| UMC Utrecht | Utrecht | Netherlands |
| Szpital Kliniczny Przemienienia Pańskiego UM | Poznan | Poland |
| Kliniczny Szpital Wojewódzki Nr. 2 w Rzeszowie | Rzeszów | Poland |
| Szpital Ministerstwa Spraw Wewnetrznych | Rzeszów | Poland |
| National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS) | Singapore | Singapore |
| SengKang General Hospital | Singapore | Singapore |
| Hospital Clinico de Barcelona | Barcelona | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario de La Princesa | Madrid | Spain |
| Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro, University Hospital of Vigo | Vigo | Spain |
| University Hospital Basel | Basel | Switzerland |
| University Hospital of Bern | Bern | Switzerland |
| Hôpital Cantonal de Fribourg | Fribourg | Switzerland |
| University Hospital Geneva (HUG) | Geneva | Switzerland |
| HOCH Health Ostschweiz Kantonsspital St.Gallen | Sankt Gallen | Switzerland |
| University Zurich | Zurich | Switzerland |
| University Hospitals of North Midlands, Royal Stoke University Hospital | Stoke-on-Trent | Staffordshire | ST4 6QG | United Kingdom |
| The Royal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals | Bournemouth | United Kingdom |
| Royal Sussex County Hospital | Brighton | United Kingdom |
| University Hospitals Bristol | Bristol | United Kingdom |
| Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh | Edinburgh | United Kingdom |
| Golden Jubilee National Hospital | Glasgow | United Kingdom |
| Glenfield Hospital | Leicester | United Kingdom |
| Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust | Manchester | United Kingdom |
| Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals | Norwich | United Kingdom |
| Trent Cardiac Centre, Nottingham City Hospital | Nottingham | United Kingdom |
| Royal Berkshire Hospital | Reading | United Kingdom |
| Northern General, Sheffield | Sheffield | United Kingdom |
| University Hospital Southampton | Southampton | United Kingdom |
| Worcestershire Royal Hospital | Worcester | United Kingdom |
| Derived |
| Spaulding C, Krackhardt F, Bogaerts K, Urban P, Meis S, Morice MC, Eccleshall S. Comparing a strategy of sirolimus-eluting balloon treatment to drug-eluting stent implantation in de novo coronary lesions in all-comers: Design and rationale of the SELUTION DeNovo Trial. Am Heart J. 2023 Apr;258:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 13. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided