Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R01HD103923-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Following a stroke, many individuals have a high risk of falls, which can negatively influence quality of life. Unfortunately, current treatments have not effectively addressed this problem. This study investigates whether two methods of delivering mechanical perturbations during walking have the potential to improve post-stroke walking balance and reduce real-world fall incidence.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reactive Perturbations | Experimental |
| |
| Proactive Perturbations | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reactive Perturbations | Behavioral | A novel device will be used to apply controlled mediolateral perturbations to participants' trunk as they walk on a treadmill, requiring reactive responses to avoid a loss of balance. All perturbations will have a duration of 200 ms, and will be applied immediately after onset of the swing phase with either the paretic or non-paretic leg. If in a given training session, a participant does not experience any losses of balance, the perturbation magnitude will be increased in the next training session. Perturbations will begin at 3% body weight (BW), and will progress in increments of 3% BW up to a maximum of 15% BW. The structure of the Reactive perturbation session will be identical to that used for Proactive perturbation training sessions, including overground trials, treadmill trials without perturbations, and Perturbed and Catch trials in which Perturbations are delivered. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fall incidence | A fall will be defined as an event in which a participant loses their balance and comes to rest on the ground, floor, or lower level. Falls will be measured during the 12-week periods preceding and following the intervention, using 2-week calendars on postcards to be sent to the investigators. | 32 weeks (12-week period pre-intervention; 12-week period post-intervention) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fear of falling | Participants will be asked if they have a fear of falling (yes/no). | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Functional Gait Assessment | A common clinical measure of gait balance |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jesse Dean | Medical University of South Carolina | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
De-identified participant data consisting of the clinical assessments and biomechanical walking data collected in this study will be shared through the IPCSR website.
The data will be shared once the primary publication generated from this study has been published.
No restrictions will be placed on the use of the data to be shared.
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Oct 29, 2024 | Dec 12, 2025 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Proactive Perturbations | Behavioral | A novel device will be used to perturb the relationship between pelvis motion and step width by applying mediolateral forces to participants' legs. Participants will first perform a 3-minute overground walking trial at their self-selected speed, in which they do not interact with the perturbation device. Participants will then perform a 3-minute treadmill walking trial at their self-selected speed, in which they again do not interact with the perturbation device. Participants will then perform a series of alternating 3-minute Perturbed and Catch trials, all at their self-selected speed. For the Perturbed trials, perturbations will be delivered in each step throughout the trial. For the Catch trials, perturbations will cease for the final minute of walking. A total of 5 Perturbed and 5 Catch trials will be performed. Finally, participants will perform a 3-minute overground walking trial at their self-selected speed, in which they do not interact with the perturbation device. |
|
| 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Activities-specific Balance Confidence scale | A common clinical measure of balance self-efficacy | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Walking speed | Participants will be instructed to walk overground along a 10-meter path at the speed they would normally use around their house of the store. Speed will be measured for the middle 6-meters of the path. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Foot placement stabilization strategy (mechanics) | We will calculate the partial correlation between the pelvis displacement at the start of each step, and step width at the end of the step, accounting for pelvis velocity. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Foot placement stabilization strategy (gluteus medius activity) | We will calculate the partial correlation between the pelvis displacement at the start of each step, and the mean magnitude of gluteus medius activity during the first half of the swing phase, accounting for pelvis velocity. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Center of pressure shift stabilization strategy (mechanics) | We will calculate the partial correlation between the pelvis velocity at the start of each step, and the magnitude of the change in mediolateral center of pressure location under the stance foot during the step, accounting for pelvis displacement. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Center of pressure shift stabilization strategy (peroneus longus activity) | We will calculate the partial correlation between the pelvis velocity at the start of each step, and the mean magnitude of peroneus longus muscle activity during the single support stance phase of this step, accounting for pelvis displacement. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Push-off stabilization strategy (mechanics) | We will calculate the partial correlation between the pelvis displacement at the start of each step, and the time integral of the total ground reaction force under the trail leg during the double support phase preceding this step, accounting for pelvis velocity. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Push-off stabilization strategy (medial gastrocnemius activity) | We will calculate the partial correlation between the pelvis displacement at the start of each step, and the mean magnitude of medial gastrocnemius activity during the double support phase preceding this step, accounting for pelvis velocity. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Largest rejected perturbation (trained perturbations) Largest rejected perturbation (trunk) | We will identify the largest mediolateral magnitude perturbation that participants can experience without a loss of balance. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Largest rejected perturbation (untrained perturbations) Largest rejected perturbation (trunk) | We will identify the largest mediolateral magnitude perturbation that participants can experience without a loss of balance. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Angular momentum modulation (trained perturbations) Largest rejected perturbation (trunk) | We will calculate the absolute difference in the range of frontal plane angular momentum during a step, relative to an unperturbed step. This will be calculated for the perturbed step and the subsequent recovery step. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| Angular momentum modulation (untrained perturbations) Largest rejected perturbation (trunk) | We will calculate the absolute difference in the range of frontal plane angular momentum during a step, relative to an unperturbed step. This will be calculated for the perturbed step and the subsequent recovery step. | 8 weeks (pre-intervention; post-intervention) |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |