Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Strategic company decision - not related to safety concerns
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Julius Clinical | INDUSTRY |
| ProPharma Group | INDUSTRY |
| Europees Fonds voor Regionale Ontwikkeling (EFRO) | UNKNOWN |
| Ardena |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This a randomized placebo controlled, double-blind phase II study to explore the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of sonlicromanol in children (from birth to 17 years) with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease of which the gene defect is known to decrease one or more oxidative phosphorylation system enzymes and who suffer from motor symptoms ("KHENERGYC").
Mitochondrial Diseases (MD) are rare progressive, multi-system, often early onset and fatal disorders affecting both children and adults. Despite advances in the understanding of mitochondrial disorders, treatment options are extremely limited and, to date, largely supportive. Therefore, there is an urgent need for novel treatments. Sonlicromanol (KH176) is an orally bio-available small molecule under development for the treatment of these disorders. The current study will explore the pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of sonlicromanol in children (from birth to 17 years) with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease of which the gene defect is known to decrease one or more oxidative phosphorylation system enzymes and who suffer from motor symptoms.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of sonlicromanol on motor symptom severity in children with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease affecting oxidative phosphorylation during a 6 month treatment period (GMFM).
The trial consists of 2 phases, with the main phase being a randomized placebo controlled, double-blind, phase II parallel group study to explore the efficacy and safety of sonlicromanol in twenty-four (24) children with mitochondrial disease and motor symptoms,.
The first phase is an adaptive PharmacoKinetics (PK) study with 4 days treatment (to expected steady state in most subjects) in the following age-groups: birth - 1 year, 1-2 years, 2- 6 years, 6-12 years, and 12 - 17 years. An age group should have at least 3 subjects before being analysed. Subjects will take 4 days of open-label sonlicromanol orally at the anticipated adult-equivalent dose. After completion of enrolment in an age group, the PK data from that age group will be analysed to confirm the adult-equivalent dose that will be used thereafter in the second phase of the trial. Older age groups will be studied before younger age groups.
In the second phase subjects will be randomized (by age group) over 2 groups. Group 1 will receive an adult-equivalent dose of sonlicromanol twice daily orally for 26 weeks. Group 2 will receive matching placebo twice daily for 26 weeks. A final follow-up visit is scheduled 2 weeks after the intake of the last dose of the treatment period.
Duration of Subject Participation:
The overall study duration of the trial for a eligible subject is estimated to be approximately 7 months, consisting of up to 4 weeks screening, 26 weeks (6 months) of treatment and 2 week post-treatment follow-up. At the end of the study treatment all participants will be offered to continue treatment with sonlicromanol during a open label extension (OLE) trial for 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sonlicromanol | Experimental | Paediatric-equivalent dose (as determined by Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modelling and the results of the Adaptive PK study) of sonlicromanol twice daily administered as an oral liquid for 26 weeks |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Matching placebo twice daily orally for 26 weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sonlicromanol | Drug | Oral administration of sonlicromanol twice daily |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Symptom Severity as assessed with the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the GMFM-88.The GMFM-88 consists of 88 questions and assesses motor function in 5 domains (lying and rolling; sitting; crawling and kneeling; standing; walking, running, and jumping). 4-point scoring system for each item, item scores ranges from 0-3. Higher scores denote better performance. Scaled score indicates the percentage of total score. Total score ranges from 0-100% | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fine manual motor skills as assessed with the 9 Hole Peg Test (NHPT) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the NHPT. The NHPT examines the fine hand motor skills by assessing the speed of movement of the hand.The fastest time of 2 attempts is recorded for the dominant hand as well as the non-dominant hand. When the maximum time is reached (50 seconds) the number of transported rods is counted (maximum = 18; minimum = 0). Faster times (in sec) and higher number of rods denote better performance. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality | Mortality rate during treatment | Up to 29 weeks |
| Health Utility Index (HUI) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the HUI. The HUI is measuring health status and health-related quality of life (HRQL) on multiple dimensions of health status, including vision, hearing, speech, ambulation/mobility, pain, dexterity, self-care, emotion and cognition and a HRQL score for overall health. Each dimension has 3- 6 levels. Overall HRQL scores range from 0.00 to 1.00. A higher score denotes better quality of life/health. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Note 1: Natural family planning methods, female condom, cervical cap or diaphragm are not considered adequate contraceptive methods in the context of this study.
Note 2: To be considered not of childbearing potential, potential female subjects must have been surgically sterilized (bilateral tubal ligation, hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy) for at least 6 months prior to Screening.
Note 3: KH176 has been shown non-genotoxic judged from the Ames test, Chromosomal Aberration test and in vivo Micronucleus test. Moreover, appreciable systemic exposure from the exposure to (~2.5 mL) semen is extremely unlikely. However, until reproductive toxicology studies have confirmed that KH176 does not adversely affect normal reproduction in adult males and females, as well as causing developmental toxicity in the offspring, the following contraceptive precautions must be adhered to:
Exclusion criteria:
Surgery of the gastro-intestinal tract with removal of piece(s) of stomach, duodenum or jejunum that might interfere with absorption. Feeding through gastrostomy tube is however allowed.
Treatment with an investigational product within 3 months or 5 times the half-life of the investigational product (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of the study medication.
Clinically relevant cardiovascular disease or risk factors for arrythmia:
Clinically relevant abnormal laboratory results:
Aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) or alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) > 3 times upper limit of normal (ULN), or bilirubin > 3 x ULN. If a patient has ASAT or ALAT > 3 x ULN but < 3.5 x ULN, re-assessment is allowed at the investigator's discretion.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate below age-appropriate limits (according to the formula: 40.9* ((1.8 / Cystatine C)0.93):
< 2 months: < 25 ml/min/1.73 m2 2 months to 1 year: < 35 ml/min/1.73 m2 > 1 year: < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2
All other clinically relevant parameters at screening or baseline as judged by the investigator
History of hypersensitivity or idiosyncrasy to any of the components of the investigational product.
Medical history of drug abuse (illegal drugs such as cannabinoids, amphetamines, cocaine, opiates or problematic use of prescription drugs such as benzodiazepines, opiates).
The use of any of the following medication and/or supplements within 4 weeks or 5 times the half-life (whichever is longer) prior to the first dosing of the study medication:
(multi)vitamins, co-enzyme Q10, Vitamin E, riboflavin, and antioxidant supplements (including, but not limited to idebenone/EPI-743, mitoQ); unless stable for at least one month before first dosing and remaining stable throughout the study.
any medication negatively influencing mitochondrial functioning (including but not limited to valproic acid, glitazones, statins, anti-virals, amiodarone, and non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)), unless stable for at least one month before first dosing and remaining stable throughout the study.
Note: thus, mitoQ and any medication negatively influencing mitochondrial functioning are allowed as long as the dose has been stable for at least one month prior to first dosing and remains stable throughout the study.
any strong Cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 inhibitors (all 'conazoles-anti-fungals', HIV antivirals, grapefruit).
strong CYP3A4 inducers (including HIV antivirals, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, rifampicin, St. John's wort, pioglitazone, troglitazone).
any medication known to affect cardiac repolarisation, unless the QTc interval at screening is normal during stable treatment for a period of two weeks, or 5 half-lives of the medication and its major metabolite(s), whichever period is the shortest (all anti-psychotics, several anti-depressants: nor- / amitriptyline, fluoxetine, anti-emetics: domperidone (Motilium®), granisetron, ondansetron).
any medication metabolised by CYP3A4 with a narrow therapeutic width.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lonneke de Boer, MD | Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Netherlands | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radboud University Medical Center | Nijmegen | Gelderland | 6525 EX | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35477351 | Derived | Smeitink J, van Maanen R, de Boer L, Ruiterkamp G, Renkema H. A randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind phase II study to explore the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of sonlicromanol in children with genetically confirmed mitochondrial disease and motor symptoms ("KHENERGYC"). BMC Neurol. 2022 Apr 27;22(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02685-3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D028361 | Mitochondrial Diseases |
| D017241 | MELAS Syndrome |
| D007888 | Leigh Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D017237 | Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathies |
| D017240 | Mitochondrial Myopathies |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C010643 | 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| UNKNOWN |
| Certara | INDUSTRY |
Randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Oral administration of matching placebo twice daily |
|
| Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Spasticity as assessed with the Modified Tardieu Scale for spasticity (MTS) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the MTS. The MTS quantifies spasticity by assessing the muscle's response to stretch applied at three specified velocities (as slow as possible; speed of limb falling under gravity; moving as fast as possible) and rating the intensity and duration of the muscle reaction to stretch and the joint angle. The quality of the muscle reaction (spasticity grade) is scored on a 5-grade scale (range: 'No resistance throughout the course of the movement' to 'Joint immovable'). Lower scores denote better performance. The Spasticity Angle X is the difference between the angles of arrest at slow speed and of catch-and release or clonus at fast speed; the Spasticity Grade Y is an ordinal variable that grades the intensity (gain) of the muscle reaction to fast stretch. The outcome parameter of angle (in degrees, range: 0-180 degrees) can only be determined with spasticity grade 2 and higher. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Dystonia as assessed with Dystonia (Barry-Albright Dystonia scale (BAD) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the BAD. The BAD assesses dystonia in eight body regions: eyes, mouth, neck, trunk, and the four extremities. Dystonia is scored as none (0), slight (1), mild (2), moderate (3), or severe (4). Individual scores for each region are added for a total score. total score ranging from 0-32. A higher score denotes worse outcome. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Ataxia as assessed with the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the SARA. The SARA is a semi- quantitative assessment of a range of different impairments in cerebellar ataxia. The scale is an 8-item based scale related to gait, stance, sitting, speech, finger-chase test, nose-finger test, fast alternating movements and heel-shin test. The score ranges from 'no ataxia' (0) to 'most severe ataxia' (40). A higher score denotes worse outcome. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Disability as assessed with the PEDI-CAT (Paediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI-CAT) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the PEDI-CAT. The PEDI-CAT is a computer adaptive caregiver report which estimates a child's abilities from a minimal number of the most relevant items or from a set number of items within three functional domains: Daily Activities, Mobility, Social/Cognitive, and Responsibility. <= 30 items per domain. Higher scores denote better performance. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Mitochondrial disease signs and symptoms as assessed with the International Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (IPMDS) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the IPMDS. The IPMDS assesses all aspects of mitochondrial disease by exploring three domains: a) 'complaints and symptoms' (23 items), b) 'physical examination' (21 items) and c) 'functional tests' (13 items). The domain and total scores are expressed as the percentage of items which were feasible to perform (maximum = 100%; minimum = 0%. A higher score denotes better performance. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Caregiver burden as assessed with the ZARIT-12 Burden scale (ZBI-12) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the ZBI-12. The ZBI-12 assesses caregiver perceptions of burden by indicating the extent of burden experienced while providing care to their child. The responses on the scale range from 'not at all' to 'extremely'. Total scores are obtained by summing the item scores, maximum = 48; minimum = 0). higher scores denote higher burden. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Quality of life as assessed with the Neurology Quality of life short Form (NeuroQL-SF) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the NeuroQL-SF. The Fatigue Short Form Paediatric version is an 8-item score evaluating the perception of fatigue and its impact in daily life activities. Scores on individual items range from 1-5. The total score ranges from 5-40. Higher score denotes worse outcome. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Clinician-scored global impression of change (CGIC) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the CGIC. The CGIC assesses the clinician's perception of the degree to which patient's illness/symptoms have improved or worsened following intervention using a 7-point Likert scale. Score ranges from 1-7. A higher score denotes worsening of symptoms. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Patient/Caregiver scored global impression of change (PGIC) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the PGIC. The PGIC assesses patient's/caregiver's perception of the degree to which patient's illness/symptoms have improved or worsened following intervention using a 7-point Likert scale. Score ranges from 1-7. A higher score denotes worsening of symptoms. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Patient/Caregiver scored impression of change on patient-identified 3 Most Bothersome Symptoms (MBSA) caused by mitochondrial disease | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the MBSA. The MBSA assesses patient/caregiver scored impression of the degree to which each of the 3 patient-identified most bothersome symptoms caused by mitochondrial disease have improved or worsened following intervention. Score ranges from 1-7 for each of the symptoms. A higher score denotes worsening of symptoms. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Growth as assessed by weight | Changes from baseline to each assessment of weight in kilogram (Kg) | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Growth as assessed by height | Changes from baseline to each assessment of height in centimeters (cm) | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Growth as assessed by head circumference | Changes from baseline to each assessment of head circumference in centimeters (cm), for children younger than 3 years only. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Growth as assessed by Body Mass Index (BMI) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of BMI, weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2 children aged 3 years and above | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Temperature | Changes from baseline to each assessment of temperature in degree Celsius | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| 10 meter Walk Test (10MWT) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the 10MWT. The 10MWT assesses the patients' physical ability to walk/run, the patients' walking speed and stamina. The patient is instructed to walk/run 10 meters and the time is measured while the patient walks the set distance. Faster times (in sec) denotes better performance. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| EQ-5D-Y Proxy | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the EQ-5D-Y. The EQ-5D-5L-Y (proxy 1) measures health in five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 response categories (levels): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient's health state is indicated in a 1-digit number expressing the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions are combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state, ranging from 11111 (having no problems in all dimensions) to 55555 (having extreme problems in all dimensions). A higher score denotes a worse health state. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| EQ-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) | Changes from baseline to each assessment of the EQ-VAS.The EQ-VAS measures perceived health, ranging from 0 ('The worst health you can imagine') to 100 ('The best health you can imagine'). Range: 0-100, a higher score denotes better health. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Overall survival | Overall survival over 29 weeks | Up to 29 weeks |
| Palatability of sonlicromanol as assessed with the five level Facial Hedonic Scale (FHS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | FHS combined with a 100-point linear visual analogue scale (VAS), with point 0 aligning with the extreme left of the facial prompt used in the FHS and point 100 aligning with the extreme right side of the FHS. The score ranges from 0 -100. A higher score denotes a better outcome/higher palatability. | Day 1 |
| Acceptability of sonlicromanol as assessed by patient/caregiver daily reporting of acceptability. | The acceptability of sonlicromanol is determined by daily assessment of acceptability by reporting if the subject has 'swallowed the total dose', 'spat out (part of) the dose', or 'refused to take dose'. Total acceptability scores are obtained by summing the number of doses totally swallowed, spat out or refused. | Up to 27 weeks |
| HbA1c: mmol Glycated Hb per mol Hb | Changes from baseline to each assessment of HbA1c. Glucose homeostasis / diabetes control | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Electrocardiogram (ECG): PQ interval (milliseconds) | Mean and the maximum change from baseline to each assessment in PQ interval. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Electrocardiogram (ECG): QRS duration (milliseconds) | Mean and the maximum change from baseline to each assessment in QRS duration. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Electrocardiogram (ECG): T peak - T end interval | Mean and the maximum change from baseline to each assessment in T peak - T end interval. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Electrocardiogram (ECG): QTc | Mean and the maximum change from baseline to each assessment in QTc. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Electrocardiogram (ECG): T wave morphology: peak, symmetry | Mean and the maximum change from baseline to each assessment in T wave morphology: peak, symmetry. | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Frequency of TEAEs throughout the study period | up to 29 weeks |
| Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHG) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in systolic blood pressure (mmHG) | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHG) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in diastolic blood pressure (mmHG) | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Heartrate (Beats Per Minute (BPM)) | Changes from baseline to each assessment Heartrate in beats per minute (BPM) | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Haematology: Concentration of haemoglobin (Hb) in mmol/L | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in haemoglobin (Hb) concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Haematology: Haematocrit (Ht): Volume of RBC as fraction of total blood volume (L/L). | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in haematocrit (Ht) in L/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Haematology: Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH) in pg/cell (average mass of Hemoglobin (Hb) per red blood cell (RBC)) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in mean corpuscular haemoglobin (MCH) in pg/cell | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Haematology: Concentration of Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC) (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Haematology: Red Blood Cell Count (RBC) (cell/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in Red Blood Cell (RBC) count in cells/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Haematology: MCV Mean Corpuscular Volume of ared blood cells in femtoliter (fL) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in mean corpuscular volume (MCV) of red blood cells in fL | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Haematology: White Blood Cell (WBC) count (cells/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in white blood cell (WBC) count (cells/L) | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Haematology: white blood cell differential (WBC differential: neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils) count (cells/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in WBC differential (neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils) count in cells/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Haematology: Thrombocytes count (cells/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in thrombocytes count in cells/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Haematology: Total protein (g/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in total protein in g/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of Alkaline Phosphatase (Units/L (U/L)) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in alkaline phosphatase concentration in U/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT) (Units/L (U/L)) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) concentration in U/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT) (Units/L (U/L)) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT) concentration in U/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (gamma-GT) (Units/L (U/L)) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in gamma-Glutamyl Transferase (gamma-GT) concentration in U/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of total bilirubin (umol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in total bilirubin concentration in umol/L) | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of urea (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in urea concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of creatinine (umol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in creatinine concentration in umol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of creatinine kinase (Units/L (U/L)) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in creatinine kinase concentration in U/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of sodium (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in sodium concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of potassium (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in potassium concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of calcium (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in calcium concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of chloride (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in chloride concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of lactate (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in lactate concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of Thyroid-stimulating Hormone (TSH) (mE/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in Thyroid-stimulating Hormone concentration in mE/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of free Thyroxine (fT4) (pmol/l) | Changes from baseline to each assessment visit in free Thyroxine (fT4) concentration in pmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration in mg/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of lipase (U/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in lipase concentration in U/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of uric acid (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in uric acid concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of phosphate (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in phosphate concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of human serum albumin (g/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in human serum albumin concentration in g/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of glucose (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in glucose concentration in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of Lipids: cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoproteins (LDL), high density lipoproteins (HDL) (mmol/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in Lipids concentration: cholesterol, triglycerides, low density lipoproteins (LDL), high density lipoproteins (HDL) in mmol/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Chemistry: Concentration of amylase (U/L) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in amylase concentration in U/L | Baseline (Day 1), week 6, week 13, week 27, week 29 |
| Metabolomics: Concentration of Fibroblast Growth factor 15 (FGF-15) (pg/mL) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in FGF-15 concentration in pg/mL) | Baseline (Day 1), week 27 |
| Metabolomics: Concentration of Growth Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15) (pg/mL) | Changes from baseline to each assessment in GDF-21 concentration (in pg/mL) | Baseline (Day 1), week 27 |
| Pharmacokinetics: Time-to-peak drug plasma concentration (Tmax) (hours) | Tmax: Time to reach maximum (peak) plasma concentration following drug administration (hours) | Baseline (Day 1), Week 27 |
| Pharmacokinetics: Peak drug concentration (Cmax) (ng/mL) | Changes from baseline to week 27 in Tmax: Maximum (peak) plasma drug concentration in ng/mL | Baseline (Day1), week 27 |
| Pharmacokinetics: Ctrough (ng/mL) | Changes from baseline to week 27 in plasma concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval at steady state in ng/mL | Baseline (Day1), week 27 |
| Pharmacokinetics: AUCinf (h*ng/mL) | Changes from baseline to week 27i n Area under the plasma concentration time curve from time zero to infinity in h*ng/mL | Baseline (Day1), week 27 |
| Pharmacokinetics: AUCtau (h*ng/mL) | Changes from baseline to week 27 in Area under the plasma concentration time curve in h*ng/mL | Baseline (Day1), week 27 |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D020739 | Brain Diseases, Metabolic, Inborn |
| D001928 | Brain Diseases, Metabolic |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D059345 | Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases |
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D008661 | Metabolism, Inborn Errors |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D015323 | Pyruvate Metabolism, Inborn Errors |
| D002239 | Carbohydrate Metabolism, Inborn Errors |