Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare the predictive value in terms of specificity of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and positron emission computed tomography (PET-CT) after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (C2), on the probability of obtaining a metabolic complete response after 4 cycles of induction chemotherapy (C4) in patients with primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (PMBL) receiving standard R-CHOP14 or R-ACVBP.
The majority of studies with PMBL patients pinpoint the importance of being able to identify primary chemo refractory patients at an early stage, in order to be able to improve their prognosis. Indeed, a biomarker such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring would be of great help to better assess the therapeutic response and offer an individualized care given the frequent positive residual uptake of the mediastinum at end of treatment. Indeed, ctDNA can be detected with Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS).
The hypothesis of this study is that it would be helpful to prospectively compare the predictive value of ctDNA versus PET on the capacity to detect primary refractory patients after 2 or 4 cycles of first line chemotherapy.
To date, there are no prospective studies reporting the evolution of the tumor clone under treatment or after obtaining complete remission in PMBL. The establishment of this prospective, multicenter, ambitious and original pilot project will make it possible to structure the analysis of tumor DNA circulating within these centers caring for patients with lymphomas within LYSA group.
The notion of minimal residual disease (MRD) has shown its interest in follicular lymphomas and mantle cell lymphomas. The level of sensitivity of NGS-type approaches on the one hand and the informativeness of the recurrent mutations recently described on the other hand constitute two elements for reconsidering the problem of MRD in PMBLs. Molecular MRD by analysis of circulating tumor DNA could constitute a new marker for monitoring response to treatment in addition to PET-CT and be useful as a tool for non-invasive tumor sequencing at diagnosis and at relapse, in order to to determine the eligibility for possible targeted therapies (based on the inactivation of mutated genes) or immunotherapies.
This study will evaluate the prognostic value of obtaining a quantified complete molecular response (RMC) by analysis of free circulating DNA (ctDNA) after 2 and 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy (C2 and C4) for the treatment of PMBL, and that of positron emission computed tomography (PET) performed at the same time, on overall survival and progression-free survival.
The investigators will describe 3 different populations of patients included in the study:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA | Other |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Circulating tumor DNA monitoring | Other | Monitoring of circulating tumor DNA after 2 and 4 cycles of chemotherapy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation between circulating tumoral DNA detection and complete molecular response | specificity of ctDNA at Cycle 2 of chemotherapy on the prediction of achieving a complete metabolic response (determined by PET-CT scan) at cycle 4 of chemotherapy | 4 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of complete metabolic response | Proportion of patient in complete metabolic response at the end of first line treatment | at the end of first line treatment |
| Evaluation of response | Percentage of patients in complete metabolic response, partial metabolic response, stable disease or pregression after 4 cycles of chemotherapy |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VINCENT CAMUS, MD | Contact | +33232082497 | vincent.camus@chb.unicancer.fr | |
| RICHARD DORIANE, PhD | Contact | +33232082985 | doriane.richard@chb.unicancer.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| VINCENT CAMUS, MD | Centre Henri Becquerel | Principal Investigator |
| PIERRE SESQUES, MD | Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud | Not yet recruiting | Lyon | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| At the end of 4 cycles of chemotherapy |
| Evaluation of response | Percentage of patients in complete metabolic response, partial metabolic response, stable disease or pregression at the end of treatment | At the end of treatment |
| overall survival | Time between death and inclusion | 3 years |
| Event free survival | Lenght of time after the end of tratment and events like progression, lake of response, relapse of death whatever the cause | 3 years |
| genic expression profile | Next-Generation-sequencing on diagnostic biopsy | 3 years |
| Genomic sequencing of circulating tumor DNA | Determination of molecular profile and evaluation of pronostic impact | 3 years |
| Correlation between Next-Generation-Sequencing on tumor and molecular profile obtained on circulating tumor DNA | Comparison between the result of Next generation Sequencing and the molocular profile obtained on circulation tumor DNA of each patient | 3 years |
| Centre Henri Becquerel | Recruiting | Rouen | France |
|