Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Kasr El Aini Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study was performed to compare both methods of skin incisions to determine differences in postoperative pain, hemodynamic changes, incisional time, blood loss during incision, wound healing, and wound complication.
Our study aims to compare the use of diathermy versus scalpel in making skin incision during cesarean section to judge the variations in
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| skin incision with a scalpel | Placebo Comparator | In the scalpel group, the incision was made by the traditional method, with proper homeostasis by applying pressure to skin blood vessels and ligating the subcutaneous bleeding. |
|
| skin incision with diathermy | Active Comparator | In the diathermy group, the incision made using a small flat blade pen electrode, set on cutting mode and delivering a 120 watt (maximum) sinusoidal current, electrosurgical cutting performed without pressure or mechanical displacement. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| skin incision with a scalpel | Procedure | A Pfannenstiel skin incision was done through the subcutaneous tissue, rectus sheath and dissected from rectus muscle until peritoneum was visualized. group 1 (skin incision with a scalpel) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| incision time | We compared incisional time by using a digital clock. The incisional time was established as follows: when skin incision was made, the surgeon called out "start the clock". Once the rectus sheath was visualized, the surgeon calls out "stop the clock". The incision time was the difference between "start" and "stop". | during surgical operation. the difference between starting skin incision till the rectus sheath was visualized |
| incision blood loss | This was calculated by weighing the swabs pre and postoperatively (1mg = 1ml) after complete hemostasis was achieved. | during surgery |
| postoperative pain | We compared those patients clinically for postoperative pain for 24 hours by visual analog scale (VAS) score, a psychometric response scale, and it is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. It is 11 points numeric scale ranges from "0" representing one pain extreme (e.g., no pain) to "10" representing the other pain extreme (e.g., "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable"). This score was recorded for each participant at 2,4,6,8,10,12,24 hours postoperatively. | during the first day after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| wound healing | healing by primary versus secondary intention | during the first week after surgery |
| wound complications | like seroma, hematoma, ecchymosis, dehiscence (separation of the subcutaneous tissues with skin), and infection |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Research Centre | Cairo | Egypt |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003972 | Diathermy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006979 | Hyperthermia, Induced |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| skin incision with diathermy | Procedure | A Pfannenstiel skin incision was done through the subcutaneous tissue, rectus sheath and dissected from rectus muscle until peritoneum was visualized. group 2 (skin incision with diathermy) |
|
| during the first week after surgery |