Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of California, Los Angeles | OTHER |
| Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation | OTHER |
| Pathfinder International | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Beyond Bias will evaluate the impact of an intervention designed to reduce family planning provider bias towards young, unmarried, and nulliparous women in Tanzania, Burkina Faso, and Pakistan. The intervention has three components: 1) a summit that includes impactful stories told to and by family planning providers that highlight the consequences of provider bias, 2) a forum for continued communication between providers, and 3) a rewards program where clinics in which providers exhibit less biased client interactions or who have improved the most towards this end will be rewarded with social recognition and a ceremony.
Half of the eligible clinics in each country (233 in total) are randomly assigned to receive the intervention, while the remaining half serves as control. The objective of the evaluation is to estimate the impact of the intervention on a range of outcomes related to quality of family planning care among young, unmarried, and nulliparous women. The investigators hypothesize that the intervention will increase the share of young, unmarried, and nulliparous women who received counseling on a range of methods, counseling on long acting methods, and who received their preferred method.
The investigators will collect four types of data to evaluate the intervention: 1) provider surveys, 2) mystery clients' visits, 3) direct observations of client-provider interactions, and 4) qualitative interviews with clients, providers, and implementors.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental |
| |
| Control | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beyond Bias Treatment | Other | The intervention has three components: 1) a summit that includes impactful stories told to and by family planning providers that highlight the consequences of provider bias, 2) a forum for continued communication between providers, and 3) a rewards program where clinics in which providers exhibit less biased client interactions or who have improved the most towards this end will be rewarded with social recognition and a ceremony. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Whether client was able to receive services | This is a measure of whether the client received family planning services on the day they came into the clinic. This will be measured from real clients using client exit surveys and using mystery clients. | 12 months after the intervention starts |
| Optimal Counseling | This is a measure of whether the client was counseled on all methods that were good options for the client given her background and preferences. This will be coded as 1 if client was counseled on the full set of optimal family planning methods and zero if the client was not counseled on the full set of optimal family planning methods. This will be collected in the client exit survey and in by mystery clients. | 12 months after the intervention starts |
| Received modern method | This is a measure of whether the client received a modern family planning method during her visit. This will be collected in the client exit survey only. | 12 months after the intervention starts |
| Perceived patient centeredness | This is a composite scale (ranging from 0 to 1) that measures the extent to which the client perceived the her interaction with family provider as patient centered. The questions included in the scale will be chosen based on data driven factor analysis methods. Higher scores will indicate better patient centeredness. This will be collected in the client exit survey and in by mystery clients. | 12 months after the intervention starts |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Provider biased attitudes | This is a composite scale (ranging from 0 to 1) that measures the extent to which providers have biased attitudes towards young, unmarried, and adolescent women. The questions included in the scale will be chosen based on data driven factor analysis methods. Higher scores will indicate better patient centeredness. This will be collected through a provider survey. | 12 months after the intervention starts |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria for Providers:
Exclusion Criteria for Providers:
Inclusion Criteria for Clients:
Exclusion Criteria for Providers:
This study is about family planning for women so we do not incldude men in the study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Zachary Wagner, Ph.D | RAND | Principal Investigator |
| Corrina Moucheraud, Ph.D | University of California, Los Angeles | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAND | Santa Monica | California | 90401 | United States |
All IPD collected as part of the study and underlying results in publications will be de-identified and made public, with the exception of the content of in-depth interviews. IPD to be made available include data collected through provider surveys, mystery client visit debrief forms, and direct observations of client-provider interactions.
IPD will be made indefinitely available 6 months after publication.
IPD will be made public, without any need for prior request.
Not provided
Not provided
Half of the eligible clinics in each country (233 in total) are randomly assigned to receive the intervention, while the remaining half serves as control.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|