Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of the present prospective, randomized single-centre study is to examine the success rate, safety, overall preoperative and operative burden and long-time outcome of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure procedures after unimodal and multimodal preprocedural imaging.
According to the investigators' primary hypothesis, simple, unimodal preprocedural imaging does not increase procedural burden of LAAC (total radiation dose, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, contrast amount). The investigators assume, that the success rate and safety of LAAC procedures is not reduced using unimodal preoperative imaging.
Regarding to postoperative imaging, the investigators aim to compare the sensitivity of different imaging techniques in detecting postoperative complications. We assume, that multimodal imaging technique increases the accuracy and sensitivity of the detection of postoperative complications (PDL, device thrombi).
Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an increasingly used non-pharmacologic strategy to prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who have absolute or relative contraindications to long-term oral anticoagulant therapy, mainly due to previous major bleeding or high bleeding risk. As the majority of candidates are elderly patients with multiple morbidities, the reduction of procedural burden is of huge significance.
The aim of the present prospective, randomized, single-centre study is to examine the non-inferiority of unimodal (MDCT) vs. multimodal (MDCT+TOE) preprocedural imaging in percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. The investigators are going to assess the success rate, safety and complications of LAAC procedures, and determine the procedural burden (total radiation dose, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, contrast amount) of the interventions after preprocedural unimodal and multimodal appendage characterization and device sizing. Multimodal procedural guidance (2D/3D TOE, fluoroscopy-angiography) and multimodal postprocedural imaging (2D/3D TOE, MDCT) is going to be used to identify complications (peri-device leak, thrombus). The investigators are planning to compare the accuracy and additive value of different postoperative imaging techniques.
.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multimodal imaging | Experimental | Preoperative 2D/3D TOE AND MDCT for appendage characterisation and sizing Operative 2D/3D TOE and fluoroscopy/angiography for guiding and checking the procedural events and success Postoperative 2D/3D TOE and MDCT to assess the complications (peri-device leak, thrombus) |
|
| Standard imaging | Experimental | Preoperative MDCT for appendage characterisation and sizing Operative 2D/3D TOE and fluoroscopy/angiography for guiding and checking the procedural events and success Postoperative 2D/3D TOE and MDCT to assess the complications (peri-device leak, thrombus) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multimodal imaging | Diagnostic Test | Preoperative 2D/3D TOE and MDCT, operative 2D/3D TOE and fluoroscopy/angiography, postoperative 2D/3D TOE and MDCT |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effective radiation dose | Total radiation dose of the patient resorbed during LAAC imaging and intervention (mSv) | Periprocedural (1 month) interval |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoroscopy time | during LAAC procedure (min) | during the procedure |
| Procedure time | of LAAC procedure (min) | during the procedure |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Andreka, MD, PhD | Contact | 0036703820470 | peter.andreka@gokvi.hu | |
| Geza Fontos, MD | Contact | 0036703820358 | geza.fontos@gokvi.hu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Anita Zadori, MD, PhD | 0036303837011, anita.zadori@gokvi.hu | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Institute of Cardiology (Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center) | Recruiting | Budapest | 1096 | Hungary |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27567408 | Background | Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 7;37(38):2893-2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210. Epub 2016 Aug 27. No abstract available. | |
| 29103847 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001281 | Atrial Fibrillation |
| D000083242 | Ischemic Stroke |
| D006470 | Hemorrhage |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D064847 | Multimodal Imaging |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective randomized one-centre trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard imaging | Diagnostic Test | Preoperative MDCT, operative 2D/3D TOE and fluoroscopy/angiography, postoperative 2D/3D TOE and MDCT |
|
| Contrast media amount | used during LAAC procedure (ml) | during the procedure |
| Rate of successful implantations | left atrial appendage occluder successfully deployed and released | during the procedure |
| Rate of patients with adequate seal of closure device | Adequate seal defined as no leak or residual leak< 5 mm established by postoperative TOE | 6 weeks post-procedure |
| Rate of procedural complications | Thromboembolic events, myocardial infarction, bleeding events, vascular complications, pericardial effusion, tamponade, infections, allergic reactions, renal insufficiency, device/air embolism, mortality | within 30 days post-procedure |
| Rate of clinical events | Composite endpoint of thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, TIA, systemic embolism) | 2 years post-procedure |
| Background |
| Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Kar S, Gibson DN, Price MJ, Huber K, Horton RP, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Gordon NT, Holmes DR Jr; PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Investigators. 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 19;70(24):2964-2975. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Nov 4. |
| 27979034 | Background | Osmancik P, Tousek P, Herman D, Neuzil P, Hala P, Stasek J, Haman L, Kala P, Poloczek M, Branny M, Chovancik J, Cervinka P, Holy J, Vancura V, Rokyta R, Taborsky M, Kovarnik T, Zemanek D, Peichl P, Haskova S, Jarkovsky J, Widimsky P; PRAGUE-17 Investigators. Interventional left atrial appendage closure vs novel anticoagulation agents in patients with atrial fibrillation indicated for long-term anticoagulation (PRAGUE-17 study). Am Heart J. 2017 Jan;183:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 11. |
| 21737601 | Background | Nucifora G, Faletra FF, Regoli F, Pasotti E, Pedrazzini G, Moccetti T, Auricchio A. Evaluation of the left atrial appendage with real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: implications for catheter-based left atrial appendage closure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Sep;4(5):514-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.963892. Epub 2011 Jul 7. |
| 28013284 | Background | Rajwani A, Nelson AJ, Shirazi MG, Disney PJS, Teo KSL, Wong DTL, Young GD, Worthley SG. CT sizing for left atrial appendage closure is associated with favourable outcomes for procedural safety. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1361-1368. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew212. |
| 11997272 | Background | Sievert H, Lesh MD, Trepels T, Omran H, Bartorelli A, Della Bella P, Nakai T, Reisman M, DiMario C, Block P, Kramer P, Fleschenberg D, Krumsdorf U, Scherer D. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: early clinical experience. Circulation. 2002 Apr 23;105(16):1887-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000015698.54752.6d. |
| 31217149 | Background | Qamar SR, Jalal S, Nicolaou S, Tsang M, Gilhofer T, Saw J. Comparison of cardiac computed tomography angiography and transoesophageal echocardiography for device surveillance after left atrial appendage closure. EuroIntervention. 2019 Oct 20;15(8):663-670. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01107. |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |