Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The MODULAR ATP Clinical Study is designed to demonstrate safety, performance, and effectiveness of the Modular Cardiac Rhythm Management (mCRM) Therapy System.
The MODULAR ATP Clinical Study will enroll subjects with a standard Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) indication applying international practice guidelines, as well as those who already have an implanted S-ICD System and satisfy the inclusion criteria for this study, while not meeting any exclusion criteria. Subjects will be followed for at least 6 months following mCRM Therapy System implantation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MODULAR ATP Study Participants | Experimental | All subjects that signed the informed consent were included. Patients consented to receive the mCRM Therapy System which consists of the EMPOWER Leadless Pacemaker and an EMBLEM S-ICD upgraded with investigational firmware. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mCRM Therapy System | Device | Communication testing between S-ICD and LCP in 4 body postures as well as required electrical testing. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Endpoint 1: Percentage of Subjects Without Major EMPOWER MPS System- or Procedure-Related Complications Through 6 Months | Major EMPOWER MPS System- and Procedure-related Complication-Free Rate Subjects will be assessed for safety issues related to the procedure or system through 6 months post implant | Implant through 6 Months Post-Implant |
| Safety Endpoint 2: Percentage of Subjects Without Major EMPOWER MPS System- or Procedure-Related Complications Through 12 Months | Major EMPOWER MPS System- and Procedure-related Complication-free Rate Subjects will be assessed for safety issues related to the procedure or system through 12 months post implant | Implant through 12 Months Post-Implant |
| Primary Effectiveness Endpoint 1: Percentage of Body Postures With Communication Success Between the S-ICD and EMPOWER PG | Communication Success between the S-ICD and EMPOWER PG Data from subjects will be assessed for effectiveness of communication between S-ICD and the EMPOWER PG by evaluating if a paced beat is present during communication testing in four postures: upright, supine, and right and left side. | At the 6 Month Follow-up |
| Primary Effectiveness Endpoint 2: Percentage of Subjects Classified as a Pacing Capture Threshold (PCT) Responder | Proportion of Subjects with Adequate Pacing Capture Threshold Effectiveness will be confirmed by evaluating the percentage of subjects considered to be a PCT Responder, defined as a subject with a PCT measurement of ≤ 2.0 V @ 0.4 ms pulse width | At the 6 Month Follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint: Subject-specific Slope of EMPOWER PG Sensor-Indicated Rate to the Subject's Workload on Treadmill Test | Metabolic-Chronotropic Relation Slope (MCR Slope) from the Kay-Wilkoff Model Using the Kay-Wilkoff model, data will be assessed to evaluate the proportionality of the EMPOWER PG's sensor-indicated rate to the subject's workload during the treadmill test | At the 3 Month Visit |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient who meets Class I, IIa, or IIb guideline ICD indications[i],[ii], or who has an existing TV-ICD[iii] or S-ICD[iv]
Patient who is deemed to be at risk for MVT based on at least ONE of the following:
Patient who is willing and capable of providing informed consent (which is not to include the use of a legally authorized representative (LAR) for documentation of informed consent) and participating in all testing associated with this investigation at an approved study site and at the intervals defined by this protocol
Patient who is age 18 years or above, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national law
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient with an ongoing complication due to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) infection or CIED explant
Transvenous lead remnants within the heart from a previously implanted CIED (Note: transvenous lead remnants outside the heart (e.g., in the SVC) are allowed)
Patient with a known LA thrombus
Patient with a ventricular arrhythmia due to a reversible cause
Patient indicated for implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
Patient with another implanted medical device that could interfere with implant of the leadless pacemaker, such as an implanted inferior vena cava filter or mechanical tricuspid heart valve
Patient requires rate-responsive pacing therapy
Patient is entirely pacemaker-dependent (defined as escape rhythm ≤ 30 bpm)
Patient with Acute Coronary Syndrome (i.e. Acute Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina) within 40 days
Inability to access femoral vein with a 21-French or larger inner diameter introducer sheath due to known anatomy condition, recent surgery, and/ or other relevant condition
Patient who has an active implanted electronic medical device intended for chronic use concomitantly with the study system, such as a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Note that a temporary pacing wire is allowed.
Patient with known or suspected sensitivity to Dexamethasone Acetate (DXA)
Patient with a known cardiovascular anatomy that precludes implant in the right ventricle
Patient with a known allergy to any system components
Patient with a known or suspected intolerance to S-ICD conversion testing, based on physician discretion
Patient is not likely to have meaningful survival** for at least 12 months (documented or per investigator's discretion)
Patient is enrolled in any other concurrent study. Co-enrollment into other studies such as observational studies/ registries needs prior written approval by BSC. Local mandatory governmental registries are accepted for co-enrollment without approval by BSC.
Patient who is a woman of childbearing potential who is known to be pregnant at the time of study enrollment (method of assessment upon investigator's discretion)
[i]Al-Khatib, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. (2018); 138:e272-e391.
[ii] 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal (2015) 36, 2793-2867.
[iii] TV-ICD system is expected to be fully explanted during or prior to full Coordinated System implant
[iv] Potential subjects with a Model 1010 S-ICD Pulse Generator are only eligible for MODULAR ATP if they are getting upgraded to Model A209, A219 or future BSC S-ICD Pulse Generator; Patients with an existing S-ICD PG subject to the electrical overstress field action are only eligible for MODULAR ATP if they are getting a new BSC Model A209 or A219, or future BSC S-ICD Pulse Generator
*Significant cardiac scar is defined as a scar involving at least one ventricular myocardial segment (i.e., basal infero-septum) as identified in the official findings of a cMRI, or nuclear viability study, or echo report by the interpreting radiologist/ cardiologist who is not affiliated with the study
**meaningful survival means that a patient has a reasonable quality of life and functional status
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Lloyd, MD | Emory University | Principal Investigator |
| Reinoud Knops, MD, PhD | Amsterdam University Medical Centre | Principal Investigator |
| Lluis Mont, MD, PhD | Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona | Principal Investigator |
| Vivek Reddy, MD | The Mount Sinai Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banner University Medical Center Phoenix | Phoenix | Arizona | 85006 | United States | ||
| Scottsdale Healthcare - Shea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37520021 | Background | Lloyd MS, Brisben AJ, Reddy VY, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Boersma LVA, Bongiorni MG, Burke MC, Cantillon DJ, Doshi R, Friedman PA, Gras D, Kutalek SP, Neuzil P, Roberts PR, Wright DJ, Appl U, West J, Carter N, Stein KM, Mont L, Knops RE. Design and rationale of the MODULAR ATP global clinical trial: A novel intercommunicative leadless pacing system and the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm O2. 2023 Jun 2;4(7):448-456. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.05.004. eCollection 2023 Jul. | |
| 38767244 |
Not provided
Not provided
There is no plan to share IPD with other researchers in this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Patients Implanted With S-ICD and Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker | Patients implanted with an S-ICD and leadless cardiac pacemaker that complete intended testing based on the study protocol mCRM Therapy System: Communication testing between S-ICD and LCP in 4 body postures as well as required electrical testing. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 29, 2022 | May 6, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Secondary Safety Endpoint | All-Cause Survival; data not reported as it is still being collected | Implant through 2 years post-implant |
| Scottsdale |
| Arizona |
| 84258 |
| United States |
| Arrhythmia Research Group | Jonesboro | Arkansas | 72401 | United States |
| AdventHealth Orlando | Orlando | Florida | 32803 | United States |
| Emory University Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | 30308 | United States |
| Baptist Health Lexington | Lexington | Kentucky | 40503 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Cooper Hospital - University Medical Center | Camden | New Jersey | 08103 | United States |
| Northwell University Hospital | Manhasset | New York | 11030 | United States |
| Mount Sinai Medical Center | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Ohio State University Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Ohio Health Research Institute | Columbus | Ohio | 43214 | United States |
| Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Erlanger Medical Center | Chattanooga | Tennessee | 37403 | United States |
| Sentara Norfolk General | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| University of Washington Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98195 | United States |
| Kepler Universitaetsklinikum | Linz | Austria |
| Institut de Cardiologie de Quebec (Montreal Heart) | Montreal | Quebec | H1T 1C8 | Canada |
| Institut Universitaire de Cardilogie et Pnuemologie de Quebec (IUCPQ) | Québec | Canada |
| Na Homolce Hospital | Prague | Czechia |
| CHU Grenoble - Hospital Michallon | Grenoble | France |
| CHRU de Lille | Lille | 59000 | France |
| CHU de Nantes-Hopital Laennec | Nantes | France |
| Hospital European Georges-Pompidou | Paris | France |
| Spedali Civil di Brescia | Brescia | Italy |
| Maria Cecilia Hospital SPA | Cotignola | Italy |
| AZ Osp Monaldi | Naples | 80131 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana | Pisa | 56126 | Italy |
| Amsterdam University Medical Center | Amsterdam | Netherlands |
| St. Antonius Ziekenhuis | Nieuwegein | Netherlands |
| Erasmus MC University Medical Center | Rotterdam | 3015 CE | Netherlands |
| Hospital Clinic of Barcelona | Barcelona | 08036 | Spain |
| The General Infirmary | Leeds | LS1 EX | United Kingdom |
| Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital | Liverpool | L14 3PE | United Kingdom |
| Manchester Heart Center | Manchester | M13 9WL | United Kingdom |
| Southampton University Hospital | Southampton | United Kingdom |
| Result |
| Knops RE, Lloyd MS, Roberts PR, Wright DJ, Boersma LVA, Doshi R, Friedman PA, Neuzil P, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Bongiorni MG, Burke MC, Gras D, Kutalek SP, Amin AK, Fu EY, Epstein LM, Tolosana JM, Callahan TD, Aasbo JD, Augostini R, Manyam H, Nair DG, Mondesert B, Su WW, Pepper C, Miller MA, Grammes J, Saleh K, Marquie C, Merchant FM, Cha YM, Cunnington C, Frankel DS, West J, Matznick E, Swackhamer B, Brisben AJ, Weinstock J, Stein KM, Reddy VY, Mont L; MODULAR ATP Investigators. A Modular Communicative Leadless Pacing-Defibrillator System. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 17;391(15):1402-1412. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2401807. Epub 2024 May 18. |
| 41231774 | Derived | Lloyd MS, Reddy VY, Roberts P, Doshi RN, Wright DL, Boersma LVA, Friedman PA, Neuzil P, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Bongiorni MG, Burke MC, Gras D, Kutalek SP, Marijon E, Tolosana JM, Amin AK, Epstein LM, Aasbo JD, Callahan TD, Brisben AJ, West J, Matznick E, Speakman B, Bachman TN, Mont L, Knops RE. One-Year Outcomes of the MODULAR ATP Trial: A Novel Leadless Pacemaker in Wireless Communication With a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2026 Jan;19(1):e014395. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.125.014395. Epub 2025 Nov 13. |
| Implanted with mCRM Therapy System or Attempt or Partial Implant |
|
| Implanted with mCRM Therapy System or Attempt |
|
| Implanted with mCRM Therapy System |
|
| Interim Analysis Cohort |
|
| CE Mark Cohort |
|
| COMPLETED | Study is ongoing. As of the date of the snapshot, 264 subjects are actively being followed |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | MODULAR ATP Study Participants | Patients consented to receive the mCRM Therapy System which consists of the EMPOWER Leadless Pacemaker and an EMBLEM S-ICD upgraded with investigational firmware |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | All subjects that signed the study informed consent were included | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| LVEF | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NYHA Classification | NYHA Classification of severity of heart failure places subjects in 1 of 4 categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity, based on physician assessment. Class I = normal function status, Class II = Slight limitation of functional status, Class III = Marked limitation of functional status, Class IV = Severe limitation of functional status. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prevention status | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ischemic cardiomyopathy | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Diabetes | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Renal dysfunction | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Hyperlipidemia | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Safety Endpoint 1: Percentage of Subjects Without Major EMPOWER MPS System- or Procedure-Related Complications Through 6 Months | Major EMPOWER MPS System- and Procedure-related Complication-Free Rate Subjects will be assessed for safety issues related to the procedure or system through 6 months post implant | Posted | Number | 98.8% Confidence Interval | % of subjects free from complication | Implant through 6 Months Post-Implant |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Safety Endpoint 2: Percentage of Subjects Without Major EMPOWER MPS System- or Procedure-Related Complications Through 12 Months | Major EMPOWER MPS System- and Procedure-related Complication-free Rate Subjects will be assessed for safety issues related to the procedure or system through 12 months post implant | Posted | Number | 97.5% Confidence Interval | % of subjects free from complication | Implant through 12 Months Post-Implant |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Primary Effectiveness Endpoint 1: Percentage of Body Postures With Communication Success Between the S-ICD and EMPOWER PG | Communication Success between the S-ICD and EMPOWER PG Data from subjects will be assessed for effectiveness of communication between S-ICD and the EMPOWER PG by evaluating if a paced beat is present during communication testing in four postures: upright, supine, and right and left side. | Number of subjects in the interim analysis cohort who underwent S-ICD to EMPOWER LP communication testing at 6 months in at least one of four postures. Results were adjusted using a repeated measures logistic regression model | Posted | Number | 97.5% Confidence Interval | Adjusted % with successful communication | At the 6 Month Follow-up | Postures | Postures |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Primary Effectiveness Endpoint 2: Percentage of Subjects Classified as a Pacing Capture Threshold (PCT) Responder | Proportion of Subjects with Adequate Pacing Capture Threshold Effectiveness will be confirmed by evaluating the percentage of subjects considered to be a PCT Responder, defined as a subject with a PCT measurement of ≤ 2.0 V @ 0.4 ms pulse width | Number of subjects in the interim analysis cohort with Pacing Capture Threshold data at 6 months | Posted | Number | 97.5% Confidence Interval | % of subjects with PCT <= 2V @ 0.4 ms | At the 6 Month Follow-up |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint: Subject-specific Slope of EMPOWER PG Sensor-Indicated Rate to the Subject's Workload on Treadmill Test | Metabolic-Chronotropic Relation Slope (MCR Slope) from the Kay-Wilkoff Model Using the Kay-Wilkoff model, data will be assessed to evaluate the proportionality of the EMPOWER PG's sensor-indicated rate to the subject's workload during the treadmill test | Data for this endpoint were obtained from the subset of subjects who consented into the substudy and performed treadmill testing at 3 months | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Beta coefficient | At the 3 Month Visit |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Secondary Safety Endpoint | All-Cause Survival; data not reported as it is still being collected | Not Posted | Feb 2027 | Implant through 2 years post-implant | Participants |
Entire available follow up: implant through 3.5 years to-date (median participant follow up = 1.3 years)
Adverse event data includes Serious/ non-serious, related/ unrelated to device were to be reported to Boston Scientific by investigational sites. All-cause mortality evaluated in all enrolled subjects (N=297). Adverse Events were evaluated in subjects implanted or attempted with S-ICD and/ or EMPOWER Leadless Pacemaker (N=288).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | MODULAR ATP Study Participants | All-cause mortality evaluated in all enrolled participants (N=297). Adverse events were evaluated for participants implanted or attempted with the mCRM Therapy System (S-ICD after study enrollment, and/ or the EMPOWER LP), N=288. Individual adverse event categories evaluated in participants at risk for that event category (287 Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker, 9 TV Lead Extraction Procedure, 288 remaining adverse event categories). | 18 | 297 | 113 | 288 | 86 | 288 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-cardiovascular | Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiovascular | Cardiac Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Endocrine Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Gastrointestinal Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiovascular | General Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | General Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Infections and Infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker - Procedure | Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD Defibrillation and Conversion Testing | Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD System Patient Related | Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD System Procedure | Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| TV Lead Extraction Procedure | Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Nervous System Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker - Right Ventricle - Brady | Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Modular System (LCP+S-ICD) | Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD Electrode | Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD PG | Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD System Diagnosis | Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD System Therapy | Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Renal and Urinary Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiovascular | Vascular Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular | Cardiac Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Endocrine Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Gastrointestinal Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiovascular | General Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | General Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD System Patient Related | General Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Infections and Infestations | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker - Procedure | Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker - Right Ventricle - Brady | Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD Defibrillation and Conversion Testing | Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD System Patient Related | Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD System Procedure | Injury, Poisoning and Procedural Complications | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiovascular | Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Modular System (LCP+S-ICD) | Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD Electrode | Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD PG | Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| S-ICD System Therapy | Product Issues | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiovascular | Vascular Disorders | MedDRA (Unspecified) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The study is limited by the nonrandomized design with no comparator group. Prespecified goals for safety and performance were used to define endpoints. Patients were selected with a high risk of ventricular tachycardia. The findings may not be generalizable to other patients who require S-ICDs or who have S-ICDs already implanted.
PI shall submit publication to Sponsor for review at least 60 days prior to submission. Sponsor reserves the right to delete any confidential info or other proprietary info of Sponsor (not incl. Results). Sponsor may extend 90 days to protect its intellectual property (IP) interests. PI shall be free to publish the results of the study after: Initial Publication is published; notification by Sponsor that Initial Publication is no longer planned; or 12 mo. after the expiration date at all sites
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julie West | Boston Scientific | 651-582-4721 | Julie.West@bsci.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | May 22, 2025 | May 22, 2025 | SAP_002.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017180 | Tachycardia, Ventricular |
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013610 | Tachycardia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D000075224 | Cardiac Conduction System Disease |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| Asian |
|
| American Indian or Alaska native |
|
| Other |
|
| Not disclosed |
|
| Multiracial |
|
| Austria |
|
| United States |
|
| Czechia |
|
| United Kingdom |
|
| Italy |
|
| France |
|
| Spain |
|
| Class III |
|
| Class IV |
|
|
| Participants |
|
| Postures |
|
|
|
|