The number of participants with knees achieving post-operative leg alignment was taken by radiographic assessment at 6 weeks. Post-operative leg alignment was achieved when the deviation from the participant specific target did not exceed ±3 degrees.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled in the study with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified. Leg alignment not collected for 1 participant in CORI UKA group, and target data was not collected for 1 participant in Conventional UKA group.

Component alignment assessed on long leg standing antero-posterior (A/P) X-rays and standard non weight bearing lateral X-rays taken 6 weeks after surgery. From the A/P radiograph, the femoral flexion angle in degrees was obtained using standard radiographic tools. Femoral flexion angle is defined as the angle formed between a line across the base of the femoral condyles and a line that is centered along the femoral canal.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

Component alignment assessed on long leg standing antero-posterior (A/P) X-rays and standard non weight bearing lateral X-rays taken 6 weeks after surgery. From the A/P radiograph, the tibial angle denotes the angle formed on the medial side of the knee from intersecting lines parallel to the tibial base plate and a line drawn parallel to the tibial canal.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

Component alignment assessed on long leg standing antero-posterior (A/P) X-rays and standard non weight bearing lateral X-rays taken 6 weeks after surgery. The total valgus angle is the sum of the femoral flexion angle and the tibial angle.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

Component alignment assessed on long leg standing antero-posterior (A/P) X-rays and standard non weight bearing lateral X-rays taken 6 weeks after surgery. The lateral view femoral flexion angle in degrees was obtained from the intersection of a line from the center of the femoral implant to the top of the femur with a line through the femoral canal. The angle is measured on the proximal side of the intersection.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

Component alignment assessed on long leg standing antero-posterior (A/P) X-rays and standard non weight bearing lateral X-rays taken 6 weeks after surgery. The lateral view tibial angle in degrees was obtained from the intersection of a line drawn parallel to the bottom of the tibial base insert and a line through the center of the tibial base and the tibial canal.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

Radiographic assessment measured by number of participants with any radiographic finds on antero-posterior (A/P) and lateral (L) views (yes/no). Radiographic findings indicated the presence of radiolucent lines, osteolysis & implant migration.

Overall number of participants analyzed indicated those enrolled in the study with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified. Data was not collected for 2 participants due to the early termination of the study.

The 2011 Knee Society Score consists of 4 separate sub-scales. The "Objective" Knee Score is seven items with a range of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

The 2011 Knee Society Score consists of 4 separate sub-scales. The Patient Satisfaction Score is five items with a range of 0 to 40, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

The 2011 Knee Society Score consists of 4 separate sub-scales. The Patient Expectation Score is three items with a range of 0 to 15, with a higher score indicating a better outcome. The Expectation score indicates the patient's opinion on the extent they expect the operation to improve their knee pain, and ability to perform activities of daily living and recreational activities.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

The 2011 Knee Society Score consists of 4 separate sub-scales. The Functional Score is nineteen items with a range of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a better outcome. Functional Score is derived from assessments of walking and standing, standard activities, advanced activities, and discretionary activities.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a Patient Reported Outcome questionnaire that was developed to assess perceived function and pain answered on a Likert scale. Responses to each question ranges from 0-4 with a range of a possible overall score from 0-48. A score of 0 is the worst possible outcome while a score of 48 is the best possible outcome.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) comprises measures for the assessment of joint-specific patient reported outcomes. Participants are asked to rate their awareness of their knee arthroplasty in 12 questions with a five point Likert response format: "Never", "almost never", "seldom", "sometimes" and "mostly". The item scores are summed and linearly transformed in a 0 to 100 scale with a high value reflecting the ability of the subject to forget about the replaced knee joint during the activities of daily living (i.e., a higher score is a better outcome).

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

The EQ-5D-5L score consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system (i.e., index score) is used to describe the participant's health state and consists of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels to choose the most appropriate answer: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The participant is asked to indicate their health state by marking the most appropriate statement in each of the five areas. The EQ-5D-5L Index Score was based on a scale of 0 to 1, with higher index values indicating better health and lower index values indicating worse health.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.

The EQ-5D-5L score consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (VAS). The VAS records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale. The scale ranges from 0 to 100 where 0 indicates 'The worst health you can imagine' and 100 indicates 'The best health you can imagine'.

Overall number of participants analyzed included those enrolled with data collected for the outcome and time frame specified.