Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Keratoplasty is one of the most common grafts and penetrating keratoplasty is still the technique most used in the world, ahead of lamellar grafts, and is estimated to represent 70% of the total.
Graft rejection is still the main cause of failure of this type of surgery, to the extent that nearly a third of all patients will in some way be affected by rejection in due course.
Numerous risk factors for rejection have been identified, whether related to the donor, the recipient, or the surgical procedure itself.
In addition, many of the studies performed have used univariate analysis only, and yet there is a strong case for multivariate analysis, given the wide range of factors that need to be examined.
This study seeks to analyze the rejection rates and the survival of penetrating keratoplasty for a group of patients from Montpellier Hospital (France).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| graft rejection | The main criterion studied is the fact that rejection had occurred, defined by the appearance of a rejection line, whether epithelial or endothelial (Khodadoust line), subepithelial infiltrates, or an anterior chamber inflammatory reaction (Tyndall effect, retro corneal precipitates and Descemet folds) with corneal edema in a previously clear graft. Opaque grafts with no clear period in the 2 weeks after grafting were not considered as rejections, but rather as straightforward graft failures. | 1 day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| irreversible graft rejection | The other criteria studied is irreversible graft rejection, defined as the persistence of a central corneal edema for 3 months despite treatment, and graft failure, defined as a second keratoplasty, or the persistence of a central corneal edema persisting for more than 3 months, whatever the cause (rejection, corneal endothelial cell failure, other). | 1 day |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
-keratoplasty performed in the ophthalmology department of the CHRU of Montpellier between 15/06/2005 and 18/09/2018
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
All consecutives keratoplasty performed in the ophthalmology department of the CHRU (Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire) of Montpellier between 15/06/2005 and 18/09/2018, a period of just over 13 years.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vincent DAIEN, MD, PhD, HDR | University Hospitals of Montpellier | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UH Montpellier | Montpellier | 34295 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35546638 | Derived | Debourdeau E, Builles N, Couderc G, Boulhic J, Chamard C, Villain M, Babeau F, Daien V. Risk factors of rejection after penetrating keratoplasty: a retrospective monocentric study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022 Nov;260(11):3627-3638. doi: 10.1007/s00417-022-05691-w. Epub 2022 May 12. |
Not provided
Not provided
NC
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003316 | Corneal Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided