Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluation of TAVR using the NAVITOR valve in a Global Investigation.
The VANTAGE clinical trial will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Navitor valve in patients with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis who are at intermediate or low risk of surgical mortality. This trial will also evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Navitor valve in a valve-in-valve application.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Analysis Cohort | Experimental | Navitor Transcatheter Aortic Valve System Navitor valves (23mm, 25mm, 27mm, 29mm, and 35mm Titan valve), FlexNav Delivery system (small and large) and Navitor Loading System (small, large, and LG+) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Navitor Transcatheter Aortic valve and FlexNav Delivery system | Device | Navitor valve is indicated for transcatheter delivery in patients with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis who are intermediate or low surgical risk. Subjects will undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the Navitor valve and FlexNav Delivery system. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Greater Paravalvular Leak (PVL) | The primary effectiveness endpoint is moderate or greater paravalvular leak (PVL) at 30 days, as assessed by the echocardiographic core laboratory. The hypothesis test was performed based on the implanted population in whom a functional Navitor valve remained implanted at 30 days. | at 30 Days |
| Primary Safety Endpoint: The Rates of All-cause Mortality or Fatal Stroke/Stroke With Disability | The composite of rate of all-cause mortality or fatal stroke/stroke with disability at 12 months post index Navitor implantation procedure as adjudicated by the CEC per Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) definitions calculated against the performance goal of 11.3%. | at 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change in Mean Transvalvular Gradient | This endpoint was evaluated by comparing the mean paired difference in mean transvalvular gradient from baseline to 12 months against the performance goal of -10mmHg. | Baseline to 12 months |
| Mean Change in Effective Orifice Area (EOA) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject who is judged by a Heart Team, including a cardiac surgeon, to be appropriate for transcatheter heart valve intervention therapy, and is deemed to be at intermediate or low risk for open surgical aortic valve replacement (i.e., heart team estimates risk of surgical mortality < 7% at 30 days, considering the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk score, overall clinical status, and other clinical co-morbidities unmeasured by the risk calculator). *
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification of II, III, or IV *
Degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echo-derived criteria, defined as:
aortic valve area (AVA) of ≤ 1.0 cm2 (or indexed EOA ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2) AND either mean gradient ≥ 40 mmHg or peak jet velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s or doppler velocity index (DVI) ≤ 0.25. The echocardiogram supporting the qualifying AVA baseline measurement must be performed within 90 days prior to informed consent). *
Aortic annulus diameter of 19-30 mm and ascending aorta diameter of 26-44 mm for the specified valve size listed in the IFU, as measured by CT (systolic phase) conducted within 12 months prior to informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Life expectancy is less than 2 years in the opinion of the Investigator.
Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction [defined as ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with acute ischemia symptoms and troponin elevation] within 30 days prior to index procedure.
Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days prior (except pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant) to index procedure or planned within 30 days following the index procedure.
Blood dyscrasias as defined: leukopenia (WBC < 3000 mm3), acute anemia (Hb < 9 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000 cells/mm³); history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
Active peptic ulcer or upper GI bleeding within 3 months prior to index procedure that would preclude anticoagulation
Recent (within 6 months prior to index procedure date) cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or a transient ischemic attack (TIA)
Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL or eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2) and/ or end stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis
Hostile chest or conditions or complications from prior surgery that would make the subject be considered high surgical risk (i.e., mediastinitis, radiation damage, abnormal chest wall, porcelain aorta, adhesion of aorta or internal mammary artery to sternum, etc.) *
Significant frailty as determined by the heart team (after objective assessment of frailty parameters) that would indicate high or extreme surgical risk *
Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation 3-4+) *
Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid or congenital bicuspid valve as verified by echocardiography or CT *
Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 30% as measured by resting echocardiogram
Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve or other implant (such as prosthetic ring or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) clip) in any valve position * (Note: Subjects with a bioprosthetic aortic valve may be included in the ViV cohort.)
Severe circumferential mitral annular calcification (MAC) which is continuous with calcium in the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) *
Severe (greater than or equal to 3+) mitral regurgitation or severe mitral stenosis with pulmonary compromise
Minimum access vessel diameter of < 5.0 mm for small FlexNav Delivery System and < 5.5 mm for large FlexNav Delivery System
Eccentricity ratio of the annulus < 0.73
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen Worthley, M.D., Ph. D. | Macquarie University Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Nicolas van Mieghem, M.D., Ph. D. | Erasmus Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Barathi Sethuraman | Abbott | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiona Stanley Hospital | Murdoch | Murdoch | WA 6150 | Australia | ||
| Prince of Wales Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 434 primary analysis subjects were registered between July 13, 2021 and November 27, 2024.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Primary Analysis Cohort | Navitor Transcatheter Aortic Valve System Navitor valves (23mm, 25mm, 27mm, 29mm, and 35mm Titan valve), FlexNav Delivery system (small and large) and Navitor Loading System (small, large, and LG+) Navitor Transcatheter Aortic Valve and FlexNav Delivery System: Navitor valve is indicated for transcatheter delivery in patients with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis who are intermediate or low surgical risk. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 26, 2024 | Jan 5, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
This endpoint was evaluated by comparing the mean paired difference in effective orifice area (EOA) from baseline to 12 months against the performance goal of 0.4 cm². |
| Baseline to12 months |
| Mean Change In KCCQ Quality Of Life Score | This endpoint was evaluated by comparing the mean paired difference in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Quality of Life (QoL) score from baseline to 12 months against the performance goal of 5 points. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better symptoms and physical functioning. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a tool of heart failure-specific health status questionnaire. Score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst and 100 represents the best quality of life. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and lower symptoms. The mean change from baseline reflects the average improvement (positive values) or worsening (negative values) in patient-reported health status. | Baseline to 12 months |
| Sydney |
| Sydney |
| NSW 2031 |
| Australia |
| Princess Alexandra Hospital | Woolloongabba | Woolloongabba | QLD 4102, | Australia |
| St. Andrew's Hospital | Adelaide | Australia |
| The Alfred Hospital | Melbourne | Australia |
| Macquirie University Hopsital | Ryde | Australia |
| Kepler Universitätsklinikum GmbH | Linz | Austria |
| AKH Wien | Vienna | Austria |
| Rigshospitalet | Copenhagen | Denmark |
| CHU Gabriel Montpied | Clermont-Ferrand | France |
| Hopital Haut Leveque | Pessac | France |
| Clinique Pasteur Toulouse | Toulouse | France |
| Kerckhoff-Klinik GgmbH | Bad Nauheim | Germany |
| Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Charité Campus Mitte (CCM) | Berlin | Germany |
| St. Johannes-Hospital | Dortmund | Germany |
| Herzzentrum Dresden | Dresden | Germany |
| Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt | Frankfurt | Germany |
| UKE Hamburg (Universitatsklinik Eppendorf) | Hamburg | Germany |
| Herzzentrum Leipzig GmbH | Leipzig | Germany |
| DHZ München | München | Germany |
| Shaare Zedek Medical Center | Jerusalem | Telaviv | 9103012 | Israel |
| Pineta Grande Hospital | Castel Volturno | Caserta | 81030 | Italy |
| Policlinico San Donato | Milan | Milan | 20097 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedale Università Padova | Padova | Padua | 35128 | Italy |
| Centro Cardiologico Monzino | Milan | Italy |
| Ospedale San Raffaele - Cardiac | Milan | Italy |
| Erasmus MC - Thoraxcenter | Rotterdam | Rotterdam | 3015 | Netherlands |
| Hospital Ramón y Cajal | Madrid | Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
| Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos | Madrid | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis | Alicante | Spain |
| Hospital Clínic de Barcelona | Barcelona | Spain |
| Hospital Virgen de Rocio | Seville | Spain |
| HerzZentrum Hirslanden | Zurich | Switzerland |
| Morriston Hospital | Swansea | Swansea | SA6 6NL | United Kingdom |
| Royal Victoria Hospital | Belfast | United Kingdom |
| Leeds General Infirmary | Leeds | United Kingdom |
| Kings College Hospital | London | United Kingdom |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Analysis population includes 434 Primary Analysis subjects with symptomatic, severe native aortic stenosis at low or intermediate surgical risk attempted with a Navitor implant, defined as the insertion of the FlexNav delivery system (loaded with a Navitor valve) into the subject's vasculature.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Primary Analysis Cohort | Navitor Transcatheter Aortic Valve System Navitor valves (23mm, 25mm, 27mm, 29mm, and 35mm Titan valve), FlexNav Delivery system (small and large) and Navitor Loading System (small, large, and LG+) Navitor Transcatheter Aortic Valve and FlexNav Delivery System: Navitor valve is indicated for transcatheter delivery in patients with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis who are intermediate or low surgical risk. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| New York Heart Association functional classification (NYHA Class) | New York Heart Association(NYHA) Functional Classification is a system used to categorize severity of symptoms in patients with heart failure or cardiac disease, based on their limitations during physical activity. Class I(Mild): No limitation of physical activity. Class II(Mild): Slight limitation of physical activity. Class III(Moderate): Marked limitation of physical activity. Class IV(Severe): Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort". Class I represents mildest level of symptoms with better outcomes, whereas Class IV represents most severe symptoms with poorest outcomes | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Greater Paravalvular Leak (PVL) | The primary effectiveness endpoint is moderate or greater paravalvular leak (PVL) at 30 days, as assessed by the echocardiographic core laboratory. The hypothesis test was performed based on the implanted population in whom a functional Navitor valve remained implanted at 30 days. | The analysis population includes the implanted population (IP) in whom a functional Navitor valve remained implanted at 30 days post index Navitor implantation procedure. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | at 30 Days |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Primary Safety Endpoint: The Rates of All-cause Mortality or Fatal Stroke/Stroke With Disability | The composite of rate of all-cause mortality or fatal stroke/stroke with disability at 12 months post index Navitor implantation procedure as adjudicated by the CEC per Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-3) definitions calculated against the performance goal of 11.3%. | The attempted population (AP) includes all registered subjects (subjects attempted with Navitor valve implantation, defined as the insertion of the FlexNav delivery system into the subject's vasculature). | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | at 12 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change in Mean Transvalvular Gradient | This endpoint was evaluated by comparing the mean paired difference in mean transvalvular gradient from baseline to 12 months against the performance goal of -10mmHg. | This secondary endpoint was assessed in the implanted population in whom a functional Navitor valve remained implanted at 12 months. Number of subjects analyzed for each secondary endpoint reflects those with paired data available at both baseline and the 12-month follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mmHg | Baseline to 12 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change in Effective Orifice Area (EOA) | This endpoint was evaluated by comparing the mean paired difference in effective orifice area (EOA) from baseline to 12 months against the performance goal of 0.4 cm². | This secondary endpoint was assessed in the implanted population in whom a functional Navitor valve remained implanted at 12 months. Number of subjects analyzed for each secondary endpoint reflects those with paired data available at both baseline and the 12-month follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | cm² | Baseline to12 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change In KCCQ Quality Of Life Score | This endpoint was evaluated by comparing the mean paired difference in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Quality of Life (QoL) score from baseline to 12 months against the performance goal of 5 points. Higher KCCQ scores indicate better symptoms and physical functioning. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a tool of heart failure-specific health status questionnaire. Score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst and 100 represents the best quality of life. Higher scores indicate better quality of life and lower symptoms. The mean change from baseline reflects the average improvement (positive values) or worsening (negative values) in patient-reported health status. | This secondary endpoint was assessed in the attempted population. Number of subjects analyzed for each secondary endpoint reflects those with paired data available at both baseline and the 12-month follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline to 12 months |
|
1 year
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Primary Analyis Cohort | Navitor Transcatheter Aortic Valve System Navitor valves (23mm, 25mm, 27mm, 29mm, and 35mm Titan valve), FlexNav Delivery system (small and large) and Navitor Loading System (small, large, and LG+) Navitor Transcatheter Aortic Valve and FlexNav Delivery System: Navitor valve is indicated for transcatheter delivery in patients with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis who are intermediate or low surgical risk. | 3 | 434 | 166 | 434 | 237 | 434 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial Fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrioventricular Block Complete | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrioventricular Block Second Degree | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bundle Branch Block Left | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bundle Branch Block Right | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac Failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myocardial Infarction | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericardial Effusion | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Paravalvular Regurgitation | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Prosthetic Cardiac Valve Thrombosis | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sudden Death | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Endocarditis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Post Procedural Haematuria | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Procedural Hypotension | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Dissection | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Occlusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Pseudoaneurysm | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Haemorrhagic Stroke | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ischaemic Stroke | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Transient Ischaemic Attack | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Device Dislocation | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Acute Kidney Injury | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal Failure | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory Failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Aortic Dissection | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrioventricular Block First Degree | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sinus Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac Failure Congestive | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Upper gastrointestinal Haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial Fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrioventricular Block Complete | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrioventricular Block First Degree | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bundle Branch Block Left | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bundle Branch Block Right | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac Failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericardial Effusion | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest Pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Paravalvular Regurgitation | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Prosthetic Cardiac Valve Thrombosis | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Bruising | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Discharge | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Ecchymosis | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Haemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vascular Access Site Pseudoaneurysm | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Transient Ischaemic Attack | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Device Dislocation | Product Issues | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Acute Kidney Injury | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal Failure | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pulmonary Haemorrhage | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory Failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Groin Haematoma | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac Failure Congestive | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lihua Li, Principal Clinical Scientist | Abbott | +1 (612) 413-0527 | lihua.li1@abbott.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 1, 2024 | Dec 12, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
|
| Australia |
|
|
| Class II |
|
|
| Class III |
|
|
| Class IV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|