Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Purpose of the study is the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Laryngopharyngeal Measure of Perceived Sensation (T-LUMP) Questionnaire, so that it would be used as an assessment tool for Turkish globus pharyngeus patients.
Globus pharyngeus or sensation may be defined as a feeling of something a lump in the throat without dysphagia. The study will assess the construct validity and reliability of the Turkish version of Laryngopharyngeal Measure of Perceived Sensation (T-LUMP) Questionnaire. The investigators developed the Turkish version of this questionnaire (T-LUMP), according to the cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. Two translators translated the LUMP into Turkish and a native English language speaker reverse-translated it into English. The back translation was sent to the original author for proofreading. The final version of the LUMP questionnaire consisted of 8 basic and understandable questions related with globus pharyngeus symptoms.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Globus pharyngeus patients | The first group consists of 80 globus pharyngeus patients who have at least a year of globus sensation complaints. The participants will given the Turkish Version of the Laryngopharyngeal Measure of Perceived Sensation Questionnaire (T-LUMP), consist of 8 questions, Glasgow Edinburg Throat Scale, and Visual analog scale. After the two weeks, 80 participants will given the T-LUMP and Visual analog scale for sampling. |
| |
| Healty subjects | The second group consists of 80 healty participants will given the T-LUMP consist of 8 questions, Glasgow Edinburg Throat Scale, and Visual analog scale |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turkish Version of Laryngopharyngeal Measure of Perceived Sensation Questionnaire | Other | The Turkish Version of Laryngopharyngeal Measure of Perceived Sensation Questionnaire consists of 8 questions related with globus pharyngeus symptoms. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The outcomes of the Turkish Version of Laryngopharyngeal Measure of Perceived Sensation Questionnaire | Turkish version of the questionnaire consists of 8 questions about globus pharyngeus consequences during patients at least a year and healty subjects. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 32. The lower scores mean no problem, higher scores mean significant problem. | Baseline |
| The outcomes of the Turkish Version of Laryngopharyngeal Measure of Perceived Sensation Questionnaire | Turkish version of the questionnaire consists of 8 questions about globus pharyngeus consequences during patients at least a year. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 32. The lower scores mean no problem, higher scores mean significant problem. | 2 weeks |
| The outcomes of Glasgow Edinburg Throat Scale | It was assessed by Turkish validated Glasgow Edinburg Throat Scale that a self questionnaire in globus pharyngeus patients. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 7 per question. The high scores were worst low scores were good. | Baseline |
| The outcomes of the visual analog scale | The globus sense was assessed by visual analog scale. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100 on a line as 100 millimetres . The high scores were worst low scores were good. | Baseline |
| The outcomes of the visual analog scale | The globus sense was assessed by visual analog scale. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100 on a line as 100 millimetres . The high scores were worst low scores were good. | 2 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Eating Assessment Tool | The Turkish validated questionnaire consists of 10 questions that scores are from 0 to 40. Low score is better, higher score is worse. | Baseline |
| Penetration and aspiration scale |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subject demographics | The median values of age and ratio of gender, and education with profession profile in all groups | Baseline |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The patients who diagnosed with Globus pharyngeus
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yavuz Atar, Asso.Prof,MD | Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yavuz Atar | Istanbul | 34384 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31643076 | Background | Melancon CC, Russell GB, Ruckart K, Persia S, Peterson M, Carter Wright S Jr,, Madden LL. The development and validation of the laryngopharyngeal measure of perceived sensation. Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):2767-2772. doi: 10.1002/lary.28348. Epub 2019 Oct 23. | |
| 32313894 | Background | Korkmaz MO, Tuzuner A, Bahcecitapar M, Karacaer C. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Glasgow-Edinburgh Throat Scale: Use for a Symptom Scale of Globus Sensation in Turkish Population. Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Mar;58(1):41-47. doi: 10.5152/tao.2020.4686. Epub 2019 Aug 15. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000079564 | Globus Sensation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003291 | Conversion Disorder |
| D013001 | Somatoform Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The scale consists of 8 levels for assessment of penetration and aspiration. The scores are from 0 to 8. Low score is better, higher score is worse.
| Baseline |
| Yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale | The scale consists of 5 assessment units for pharyngeal residue. The scores are from 1 to 5. Low score is better, higher score is worse. | Baseline |