Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-A02600-39 | Other Identifier | ID/RCB |
Not provided
Not provided
Decision of the sponsor
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Urgotech | INDUSTRY |
| University Hospital, Grenoble | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The management of insomnia includes, as a first step, a healthy lifestyle, including physical activity at appropriate times, nutritional monitoring, reduced consumption of stimulants, bedtime and wake-up times that do not vary between weekdays and weekends, banning screens at least two hours before bedtime, etc. If all these conditions are met and insomnia persists, additionnal therapies may be offered. URGOTECH has developed a connected headband allowing to practice neurofeedback in complete autonomy in subjects reporting dissatisfaction with the quality of their sleep.
Among the parameters of brain activity used in neurofeedback, the most frequently used EEG activity is training to strengthen sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). This training could make it possible to reduce cortical hyperstimulation associated with certain sleep disorders. Our hypothesis is that the application of such a neurofeedback technique in an ecological situation at home will improve the subjective quality of their sleep.
The subject must perform, at home, at least 3 sessions per week with the URGOnight solution for about 4 months. Since regularity is important in order to observe effects, subjects are followed up by smartphone application at least 3 times over the training period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| URGOnight | Experimental | Use of the URGOnight neurofeedback training headband and its associated application |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| URGOnight | Device | URGOnight is a daytime brain training solution (CE marked) aim at improve the quality of sleep. The device consists of an electroencephalographic (EEG) measuring strip connected to a mobile application. The latter is available free of charge on Android and iOS in various mobile application stores (Google Play Store and App Store). URGOnight is a wireless device, it connects via Bluetooth® Low Energy (BLE) to the URGOnight mobile application running on a smartphone. The EEG data is broadcast via a BLE protocol, and the standard Bluetooth® operating distance has a range of 10 meters. To use the URGOnight solution, the user must authorize the application to access his phone's memory to store his usage data and must also authorize the geolocation of his phone to enable BLE connection. This data is not recorded but is necessary for the proper functioning of the solution. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness of the URGOnight device on the severity of insomnia | Assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score | Change from Baseline ISI score at 4 months of treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Adherence to therapy | Average frequency of use greater than or equal to 12 sessions per month and the number of training interruptions of more than 7 days less than 2, combined to report adherence to therapy | During the 4 months of treatment |
| Acceptability assessed through the motivation of the subject |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pellegrin University Hospital | Bordeaux | 33000 | France | |||
| Grenoble Alpes University Hospital |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007319 | Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders |
| D012893 | Sleep Wake Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020919 | Sleep Disorders, Intrinsic |
| D020920 | Dyssomnias |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Interventional, prospective, open-labelled, multicenter, French study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Motivation to do the exercises evaluated by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) |
| Visit 3 (Day 100) |
| Ease of use perceived by the user | Evaluation by a satisfaction questionnaire: comfort, aesthetics, practicality, ... | Visit 3 (Day 100) |
| Learning to control the neurofeedback task | Measurement of the amplitude in µV² of SMR activity in baseline and during exercises | Up to 4 months of treatment |
| Performance during neurofeedback exercises | Progression of URGOnight neurofeedback training scores calculated by the application | Up to 4 months of treatment |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on subjective sleep efficiency (WASO) | Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) determined by sleep diary | V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on subjective sleep efficiency (SOL) | Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) determined by sleep diary | V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on subjective sleep efficiency (TST) | Total Sleep Time (TST) determined by sleep diary | V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on subjective sleep efficiency (SE) | Sleep efficiency (SE) determined by sleep diary | V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on objective sleep efficiency (WASO) | Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) determined by polysomnography | V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on objective sleep efficiency (SOL) | Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) determined by polysomnography | V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on objective sleep efficiency (TST) | Total Sleep Time (TST) determined by polysomnography | V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on objective sleep efficiency (SE) | Sleep efficiency (SE) determined by polysomnography | V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on objective sleep efficiency (Sleep fragmentation index) | Sleep fragmentation index determined by polysomnography | V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Increase in sleep satisfaction | Sleep questionnaire in the application (overall score) | Up to 4 months of treatment |
| Progression of the sleep hygiene | Sleep hygiene questionnaire in the application (overall score) | Up to 4 months of treatment |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on quality of life (Daytime sleepiness) | Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire | V0 (Day 0) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on quality of life (Overall perceived improvement) | Patient global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire | Visit 5 (Day 116) |
| Maintaining of sleep improvement | Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) questionnaire | V6 (6-month follow-up visit) and V7 (9-month follow-up visit) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on sleep and wakefulness physiology (resting EEG) | Resting electroencephalographic (EEG) test (10-20 min) | V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on sleep physiology (density of sleep zones) | Density of sleep zones by polysomnography | V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on sleep physiology (amplitude of sleep zones) | Amplitude of sleep zones by polysomnography | V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on sleep physiology (time spent in each sleep stages) | Percentage of time spent in each sleep stage determined by polysomnography | V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the URGOnight device on wakefulness physiology (time spent in each sleep stages) | Percentage of time spent in each sleep stage determined by polysomnography | V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the device on memory | McNair Self-Questionnaire | V1 (Day 2), V2 (Day 65) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Effect of the device on anxiety | State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Y-A Form (STAI-YA) | V1 (Day 2), V2 (Day 65) and V5 (Day 116) |
| Device safety | Collection of Adverse Events | Through study completion (an average of 10 months) |
| Strategies used to get the exercises done | Collection of the strategy employed (in the application) | Up to 4 months of treatment |
| Sub-group analysis of all judging criteria based on chronotype | HORNE and OBSERG Circadian Typology Questionnaire | Visit 1 (Day 2) |
| Sub-group analysis of all judging criteria based on level of control over technology | KUT (One-Dimensional Target Neutral) Locus of Control Questionnaire | Visit 1 (Day 2) |
| Grenoble |
| 38000 |
| France |
| Lille University Hospital | Lille | 59000 | France |
| Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu - APHP | Paris | 75004 | France |
| D009461 |
| Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |