Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of California, Los Angeles | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to understand the comparative effectiveness of two PSH models (PB-PSH and SS-PSH) on quality of life and COVID-19 related health behaviors by following for 6 months a cohort of 800 PEH who have been placed in either PB (n=400) or SS (n=400). In a natural observational experiment, participants will complete 6 monthly mobile-based questionnaires exploring quality of life including physical, mental, social, and housing/environmental health, COVID-19 prevention practices (i.e., handwashing, social distancing, face covering), and past-30-day healthcare utilization. A sub-sample of 40 participants living in both PB-PSH and SS-PSH will be qualitatively interviewed longitudinally to help contextualize quantitative findings. Focus groups will also be conducted with providers of PSH and qualitative interviews will be conducted with other key stakeholders to understand perspectives on the challenges of implementing and sustaining COVID-19 related prevention practices while maintaining a continuity of care.
This study will aim to understand the comparative effectiveness of PB-PSH and SS-PSH on patient-centered quality of life, health care utilization, and health behaviors that will reduce COVID-19 risk by following a diverse sample of 800 PEH who are placed in PB-PSH (n = 400) or SS-PSH (n = 400) for 6 months. Barriers and facilitators will also be identified that may affect PSH implementation during the pandemic and its aftermath. The specific aims are:
Aim 1: To test the comparative effectiveness of PB-PSH and SS-PSH on COVID-19-related health behaviors (COVID-19-related personal health practices including social distancing) for PEH over time.
Aim 2: To test the comparative effectiveness of PB-PSH and SS-PSH on patient-centered quality of life (i.e., general life satisfaction; physical, mental, social, and environmental health) for PEH over time.
Aim 3: To test the comparative effectiveness of PB-PSH and SS-PSH on health care utilization health behaviors and unmet need for care for physical health, mental health, substance use disorders, for PEH over time.
Aim 4: To contextualize quantitative findings through longitudinal qualitative inquiry with 40 participants, purposively sampled from PB-PSH and SS-PSH, based on whether they are following social distancing guidelines.
Aim 5: To understand service providers, policy makers, and other stakeholders perspectives on challenges of implementing and sustaining COVID-19-related prevention practices and continuity of care in PSH.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Life Satisfaction | The NIH Toolbox item Bank v2.0 contains 10 items and will be utilized for participants to self-rate their life satisfaction | Change of Life satisfaction from baseline to 6 months |
| Quality of physical health | Self-rated physical health and frequency/quantity of health-related activities will be assessed with the PROMIS Global Health Scale Version 1.2. Scores range from 1-10, with higher scores reflecting better functioning. | Change in quality of physical health from baseline to 6 months |
| Degree of mental health symptomatology | The PROMIS will also be utilized to assess self-rated frequency the participant is bothered by mental health symptoms. The lowest possible score is 8 and the highest possible score is 40. Higher scores reflect more problematic symptomatology. | Change in symptomatology from baseline to 6 months |
| Social Isolation | The PROMIS will be utilized to assess social isolation including perceptions of being avoided, excluded, detached, disconnected from, or unknown by, others. Scores range from 6 to 40 with higher scores representing increased perceptions of isolation. | Change in social isolation from baseline to 6 months |
| Housing Environment | The Housing Environment Scale will assess residential satisfaction and neighborhood quality/safety. There are 5 subscales assessing the following: physical quality of the home, perceived quality of the neighborhood, perceived social climate in neighborhood, physical quality of home, and the physical quality of the neighborhood. Scales contain a range of 14 to 17 items with scores that range from 14 to 85 with higher scores representing increased satisfaction with environment. | Change in satisfaction with housing environment from baseline to 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| COVID-19 Prevention practices | The NIH Disaster Research Response Platform will assess participant frequency of handwashing, social distancing, and use of face covering. | Change in use of prevention practices from baseline to 6 months |
| Healthcare Utilization |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
800 adults experiencing homelessness who have been approved for permanent supportive housing (PSH) in Los Angeles
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Benjamin Henwood | University of Southern California | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) | Los Angeles | California | 91303 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37115590 | Derived | Henwood BF, Kuhn R, Padwa H, Ijadi-Maghsoodi R, Corletto G, Lawton A, Chien J, Bluthenthal R, Cousineau MR, Chinchilla M, Tran Smith B, Vickery KD, Harris T, Patanwala M, Akabike W, Gelberg L. Investigating the Comparative Effectiveness of Place-Based and Scatter-Site Permanent Supportive Housing for People Experiencing Homelessness During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocols for a Mixed Methods, Prospective Longitudinal Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 28;12:e46782. doi: 10.2196/46782. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Dec 20, 2023 | |
| Reset | Jun 20, 2024 | |
| Release | May 28, 2025 | |
| Reset | Jun 13, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2023 | Jun 20, 2024 | |||
| May 28, 2025 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086382 | COVID-19 |
| D000092862 | Psychological Well-Being |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011024 | Pneumonia, Viral |
| D011014 | Pneumonia |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will record their past 30-day use of physical and mental health treatment, social services, and support provided by the permanent supportive housing program |
| Change in utilization from baseline to 6 months |
| Jun 13, 2025 |
| D014777 |
| Virus Diseases |
| D018352 | Coronavirus Infections |
| D003333 | Coronaviridae Infections |
| D030341 | Nidovirales Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D010549 | Personal Satisfaction |
| D001519 | Behavior |