Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| ID-RCB | Other Identifier | 2020-A03451-38 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Heart failure is a severe disease affecting approximately 1-2% of the adult population in developed countries and around 26 million people worldwide. Up to 10% of these patients are in advanced stage heart failure, which is defined by a significant morbimortality and considerable medical expenses. Despite advances in its medical management, advanced (or end stage) heart failure is characterized by refractoriness to conventional therapies including guideline-directed pharmacological and non-surgical device treatments. These patients remain severely symptomatic (NYHA IV) and have objective signs of congestion or low cardiac output.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been used in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction for almost 20 years either as an alternative or a bridge to heart transplantation. LVADs improve heart failure symptoms and survival at the cost of increased rates of infection, stroke and bleeding.
Despite the lack of evidence, LVAD implantation in ambulatory patients is not rare, with INTERMACS profiles ≥4 patients representing 15.7% of the overall population implanted between 2012 and 2016.
The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of left ventricular assist devices compared to traditional HF medical treatment alone in a population of ambulatory advanced heart failure patients. Secondary objectives are to better identify subgroups of patients that would benefit the most from the implantation of an LVAD as well as to assess the optimal timing of intervention.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early Left Ventricular Assist Device and Guideline Directed Medical Therapy | Experimental | The intervention group will receive an early left ventricular assist device implantation (bridge to transplantation, bridge to candidacy or destination therapy) in addition to guideline directed medical therapy within 21 days of randomization. |
|
| Guideline Directed Medical Therapy | Other | Patients randomized in the control group will continue their guideline directed medical therapy which comprises the following stable combination at the maximal tolerated dose of betablockers, Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme-inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers or Angiotensin receptor Neprilysin inhibitor and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists and Sodium-GLucose co-Transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors if tolerated. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HeartMate 3 TM Left Ventricular Assist System | Device | The HeartMate 3 TM Left Ventricular Assist System will be implanted within 21 days of randomization. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All-cause mortality rate | The composite of 5 clinical endpoints is using a win ratio concept. Mortality has higher priority than Urgent ECMO implantation, urgent heart transplantation or LVAD implantation, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure, improvement of KCCQ by at least 5points, improvement of 6-minute walk test distance by at least 75 meters. Our main approach uses matched pairs of patients. Each pair is 'untied' first on the basis of the most important event (death) and secondly (if necessary) on the lesser event. The numbers of pairs in which the patient on new treatment 'won' and 'lost' are compared to produce the 'win ratio'. The 95% CI and P-value for the win ratio are readily obtained. | Through 24 months when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up |
| Number of urgent ECMO implantation | The composite of 5 clinical endpoints is using a win ratio concept. Mortality has higher priority than Urgent ECMO implantation, urgent heart transplantation or LVAD implantation, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure, improvement of KCCQ by at least 5points, improvement of 6-minute walk test distance by at least 75 meters. Our main approach uses matched pairs of patients. Each pair is 'untied' first on the basis of the most important event (death) and secondly (if necessary) on the lesser event. The numbers of pairs in which the patient on new treatment 'won' and 'lost' are compared to produce the 'win ratio'. The 95% CI and P-value for the win ratio are readily obtained. | Through 24 months when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up |
| Number of urgent heart transplantation | The composite of 5 clinical endpoints is using a win ratio concept. Mortality has higher priority than Urgent ECMO implantation, urgent heart transplantation or LVAD implantation, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure, improvement of KCCQ by at least 5points, improvement of 6-minute walk test distance by at least 75 meters. Our main approach uses matched pairs of patients. Each pair is 'untied' first on the basis of the most important event (death) and secondly (if necessary) on the lesser event. The numbers of pairs in which the patient on new treatment 'won' and 'lost' are compared to produce the 'win ratio'. The 95% CI and P-value for the win ratio are readily obtained. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of adverse events (AEs) | at 1 month | |
| Number of adverse events (AEs) | at 3 months | |
| Number of adverse events (AEs) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
All patients ≥18 years,
End-stage heart failure, evaluated by the local Heart Team, defined as:
Having a health coverage,
Signed written informed consent,
Patient without any legal protection measure.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillaume BAUDRY, Dr | Contact | 383157331 | +33 | g.baudry@chru-nancy.fr |
| Géraldine SAMSON | Contact | geraldine.samson@chu-lyon.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Guillaume BAUDRY, Dr | CHRU Nancy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Besançon | Recruiting | Besançon | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Guideline Directed Medical Therapy | Other | Patients randomized in the control group will continue their guideline directed medical therapy which comprises the following stable combination at the maximal tolerated dose of betablockers, Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme-inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers or Angiotensin receptor Neprilysin inhibitor and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists and Sodium-GLucose co-Transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors if tolerated. |
|
| Through 24 months when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up |
| Number of LVAD implantation | The composite of 5 clinical endpoints is using a win ratio concept. Mortality has higher priority than Urgent ECMO implantation, urgent heart transplantation or LVAD implantation, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure, improvement of KCCQ by at least 5points, improvement of 6-minute walk test distance by at least 75 meters. Our main approach uses matched pairs of patients. Each pair is 'untied' first on the basis of the most important event (death) and secondly (if necessary) on the lesser event. The numbers of pairs in which the patient on new treatment 'won' and 'lost' are compared to produce the 'win ratio'. The 95% CI and P-value for the win ratio are readily obtained. | Through 24 months when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up |
| Number of unplanned hospitalization for heart failure | The composite of 5 clinical endpoints is using a win ratio concept. Mortality has higher priority than Urgent ECMO implantation, urgent heart transplantation or LVAD implantation, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure, improvement of KCCQ by at least 5points, improvement of 6-minute walk test distance by at least 75 meters. Our main approach uses matched pairs of patients. Each pair is 'untied' first on the basis of the most important event (death) and secondly (if necessary) on the lesser event. The numbers of pairs in which the patient on new treatment 'won' and 'lost' are compared to produce the 'win ratio'. The 95% CI and P-value for the win ratio are readily obtained. | Through 24 months when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up |
| Quality of life assessed by KCCQ score | The composite of 5 clinical endpoints is using a win ratio concept. Mortality has higher priority than Urgent ECMO implantation, urgent heart transplantation or LVAD implantation, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure, improvement of KCCQ by at least 5points, improvement of 6-minute walk test distance by at least 75 meters. Our main approach uses matched pairs of patients. Each pair is 'untied' first on the basis of the most important event (death) and secondly (if necessary) on the lesser event. The numbers of pairs in which the patient on new treatment 'won' and 'lost' are compared to produce the 'win ratio'. The 95% CI and P-value for the win ratio are readily obtained. | Through 24 months when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up |
| Distance in meters at 6-min walking test | The composite of 5 clinical endpoints is using a win ratio concept. Mortality has higher priority than Urgent ECMO implantation, urgent heart transplantation or LVAD implantation, unplanned hospitalization for heart failure, improvement of KCCQ by at least 5points, improvement of 6-minute walk test distance by at least 75 meters. Our main approach uses matched pairs of patients. Each pair is 'untied' first on the basis of the most important event (death) and secondly (if necessary) on the lesser event. The numbers of pairs in which the patient on new treatment 'won' and 'lost' are compared to produce the 'win ratio'. The 95% CI and P-value for the win ratio are readily obtained. | Through 24 months when the last subject completes 12 months of follow-up |
| at 6 months |
| Number of adverse events (AEs) | at 12 months |
| Number of adverse events (AEs) | at 18 months |
| Number of adverse events (AEs) | at 24 months |
| All-cause mortality rate | at 1 month |
| All-cause mortality rate | at 3 months |
| All-cause mortality rate | at 6 months |
| All-cause mortality rate | at 12 months |
| All-cause mortality rate | at 18 months |
| All-cause mortality rate | at 24 months |
| number of ECMO implantation | at 1 month |
| number of ECMO implantation | at 3 months |
| number of ECMO implantation | at 6 months |
| number of ECMO implantation | at 12 months |
| number of ECMO implantation | at 18 months |
| number of ECMO implantation | at 24 months |
| number of urgent heart transplantation | at 1 month |
| number of urgent heart transplantation | at 3 months |
| number of urgent heart transplantation | at 12 months |
| number of urgent heart transplantation | at 18 months |
| number of urgent heart transplantation | at 24 months |
| VAD implantation rate | at 1 month |
| VAD implantation rate | at 3 months |
| VAD implantation rate | at 6 months |
| VAD implantation rate | at 12 months |
| VAD implantation rate | at 18 months |
| VAD implantation rate | at 24 months |
| Unplanned hospitalization for heart failure rate | at 1 month |
| Unplanned hospitalization for heart failure rate | at 3 months |
| Unplanned hospitalization for heart failure rate | at 6 months |
| Unplanned hospitalization for heart failure rate | at 12 months |
| Unplanned hospitalization for heart failure rate | at 18 months |
| Unplanned hospitalization for heart failure rate | at 24 months |
| Recurrent hospitalizations rate | Defined as total number of hospitalizations | at 1 month |
| Recurrent hospitalizations rate | Defined as total number of hospitalizations | at 3 months |
| Recurrent hospitalizations rate | Defined as total number of hospitalizations | at 6 months |
| Recurrent hospitalizations rate | Defined as total number of hospitalizations | at 12 months |
| Recurrent hospitalizations rate | Defined as total number of hospitalizations | at 18 months |
| Recurrent hospitalizations rate | Defined as total number of hospitalizations | at 24 months |
| Number of patients with a persistence of the eligibility to LVAD implantation | In the GDMT group only | at 12 and 24 months |
| Number of patients with a persistence of the eligibility to LVAD implantation | In the GDMT group only | at 12 months |
| Number of days alive out of hospital | at 24 months |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) status | at inclusion |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) status | at 1 month |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) status | at 3 months |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) status | at 6 months |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) status | at 12 months |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) status | at 18 months |
| New York Heart Association (NYHA) status | at 24 months |
| Distance in meters at 6-min walking test | at inclusion |
| Distance in meters at 6-min walking test | at 3 months |
| Distance in meters at 6-min walking test | at 6 months |
| Distance in meters at 6-min walking test | at 12 months |
| Distance in meters at 6-min walking test | at 18 months |
| Distance in meters at 6-min walking test | at 24 months |
| Quality of life assessed by European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire score | at inclusion |
| Quality of life assessed by European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire score | at 3 months |
| Quality of life assessed by European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire score | at 6 months |
| Quality of life assessed by European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire score | at 12 months |
| Quality of life assessed by European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire score | at 18 months |
| Quality of life assessed by European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire score | at 24 months |
| Quality of life assessed by KCCQ score | at inclusion |
| Quality of life assessed by KCCQ score | at 3 months |
| Quality of life assessed by KCCQ score | at 6 months |
| Quality of life assessed by KCCQ score | at 12 months |
| Quality of life assessed by KCCQ score | at 18 months |
| Quality of life assessed by KCCQ score | at 24 months |
| Right ventricular function assessed by echocardiographic parameters | at inclusion |
| Right ventricular function assessed by echocardiographic parameters | at 3 months |
| Right ventricular function assessed by echocardiographic parameters | at 6 months |
| Right ventricular function assessed by echocardiographic parameters | at 12 months |
| Right ventricular function assessed by echocardiographic parameters | at 18 months |
| Right ventricular function assessed by echocardiographic parameters | at 24 months |
| Heart failure assessed by N Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) rate | at inclusion |
| Heart failure assessed by N Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) rate | at 3 months |
| Heart failure assessed by N Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) rate | at 6 months |
| Heart failure assessed by N Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) rate | at 12 months |
| Heart failure assessed by N Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) rate | at 18 months |
| Heart failure assessed by N Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) rate | at 24 months |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Soluble urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (SuPAR) | at inclusion |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Soluble urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (SuPAR) | at 1 month |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Soluble urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (SuPAR) | at 6 months |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Soluble urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (SuPAR) | at 12 months |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Soluble urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (SuPAR) | at 24 months |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) | at inclusion |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) | at 1 month |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) | at 6 months |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) | at 12 months |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) | at 24 months |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM1) | at inclusion |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM1) | at 1 month |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM1) | at 3 months |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM1) | at 12 months |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM1) | at 18 months |
| Cardio-renal syndrome assessed by rates of Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM1) | at 24 months |
| Hôpital Pneumologique et Cardiovasculaire Louis Pradel | Recruiting | Bron | France |
|
| CHU Caen | Recruiting | Caen | France |
|
| La Tronche Hospital / CHU Grenoble | Recruiting | La Tronche | France |
|
| Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital / CHU Montpellier | Recruiting | Montpellier | France |
|
| CHU Rouen | Recruiting | Rouen | France |
|
| CHU Tours | Recruiting | Tours | France |
|
| CHRU, Institut Lorrain du Coeur et des Vaisseaux Louis Mathieu | Recruiting | Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy | France |
|