Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| PA Breast Cancer Coalition | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
There are women for whom a screening breast MRI is clinically recommended, but not feasible either due to patient factors (body habitus, pacemaker or other implant, claustrophobia) or access (cost, other constraints). Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a potential alternative to MRI for screening that uses updated standard mammography equipment to obtain low- and high-energy images after intravenous injection of iodinated contrast (as used in CT scanning). The investigators seek to validate screening CEM as an alternative to screening MRI.
This is a prospective study designed to evaluate the role of contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) in screening for breast cancer. The overarching goal of the research program is to improve cancer detection on screening, particularly in women with dense breasts. MRI depicts more cancers than other screening methods, including ultrasound. MRI is proven to both improve cancer detection and reduce clinically detected cancers ("interval cancers") after a negative screening mammogram in women with dense breasts. PA Senate Bill 595, signed into law June 30, 2020, requires insurance carriers to provide coverage for supplemental screening with MRI or ultrasound for a variety of indications. Relative to the number of women who may benefit from screening MRI, there is a shortage of equipment/capacity. Further, nearly half of women cannot have an MRI for medical or other reasons, such as claustrophobia, implanted devices, body habitus, or cost (deductible and copay apply even with the new legislation). Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) appears to have similar performance to MRI but has not been widely validated, particularly for screening. In order to lay the foundation for improved screening of women with dense breasts, the investigators seek to offer screening CEM as an alternative to MRI for women who meet guidelines for screening MRI but are unable to have MRI.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast-enhanced mammography | Experimental | Women who meet criteria for supplemental screening MRI, but who are unable to have MRI for medical/access/cost reasons, will be invited to have screening with contrast-enhanced mammography. Women will also have standard-of-care mammography/tomosynthesis per usual clinical practice. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contrast-enhanced mammography | Device | supplemental breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced mammography |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cancer Detection Rate (CDR) Per 1,000 Screenings | Cancer detection rate per 1,000 screenings with CEM compared to standard mammography/tomosynthesis (DBT) alone. Interpretation and performance outcomes from the primary reader were compared between standard-of-care DBT examinations interpreted alone and DBT examinations interpreted with the addition of CEM. | 1.5 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| False Positive Recall Rates | To assess changes in false positive recall rates from CEM. DBT false-positive findings for primary observer (usual care) vs DBT and CEM false positive findings for primary observer | 1.5 years |
| Biopsy Rate |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Asymptomatic women under age 75 who are recommended for annual screening MRI and mammography based on current criteria:
Women with lobular carcinoma in situ (1% of women biopsied each year; about 0.06% of our screening population) beginning the year after diagnosis.
Women with a personal history of breast cancer diagnosed by age 50 or with dense breasts (21), beginning the year after diagnosis (will be recruited under separate ongoing TOCEM protocol).
Women with heterogeneously dense breasts and any family history of breast cancer (about 36% of the screening population has dense breasts and about 20% have a family history of breast cancer) who do not meet current high-risk criteria, beginning at age 40 or ten years prior to the age of the youngest relative but not before age 30.
Participants are expected to have medical or other reasons that they are not able to have screening breast MRI.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wendie Berg, MD, PhD | University of Pittsburgh | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPMC Magee at the Lemieux Sports Complex | Cranberry Township | Pennsylvania | 16066 | United States | ||
| UPMC Magee Monroeville Breast Care Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40525975 | Derived | Berg WA, Vargo A, Lu AH, Berg JM, Bandos AI, Hartman JY, Zuley ML, Ganott MA, Kelly AE, Nair BE, Chough DM, Reginella RF, Wallace LP, Harnist KS, Carlin BA, Cohen CS, Hakim CM, Sumkin JH. Screening for Breast Cancer with Contrast-enhanced Mammography as an Alternative to MRI: SCEMAM Trial Results. Radiology. 2025 Jun;315(3):e242634. doi: 10.1148/radiol.242634. |
Not provided
Not provided
Images may be shared with secondary investigators, including commercial companies after removal of all identifiers. All patient identification (name, patient number, birth date) will be removed from the DICOM headers of the images.
Not provided
after publication
secondary investigators for image analysis. Sharing via Box
Not provided
All participants who signed informed consent were assigned to a single screening contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) examination with clinical standard-of-care tomosynthesis (DBT).Two radiologists (one primary) evaluated each pair of examinations by sequentially interpreting each of DBT and CEM in opposing order, initially blinded to the other modality.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Contrast-enhanced Mammography | Women who meet criteria for supplemental screening MRI, but who are unable to have MRI for medical/access/cost reasons, will be invited to have screening with contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM). Women will also have standard-of-care mammography/tomosynthesis (DBT) per usual clinical practice. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
All participants were assigned to screening contrast enhanced mammography with standard of care tomsynthesis (DBT).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Contrast-enhanced Mammography | Women who meet criteria for supplemental screening MRI, but who are unable to have MRI for medical/access/cost reasons, will be invited to have screening with contrast-enhanced mammography. Women will also have standard-of-care mammography/tomosynthesis per usual clinical practice. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Cancer Detection Rate (CDR) Per 1,000 Screenings | Cancer detection rate per 1,000 screenings with CEM compared to standard mammography/tomosynthesis (DBT) alone. Interpretation and performance outcomes from the primary reader were compared between standard-of-care DBT examinations interpreted alone and DBT examinations interpreted with the addition of CEM. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | CDR per 1,000 screenings | 1.5 years |
|
1.5 years
All participants were assigned to screening contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) with standard of care tomosynthesis (DBT).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Contrast-enhanced Mammography | Women who meet criteria for supplemental screening MRI, but who are unable to have MRI for medical/access/cost reasons, will be invited to have screening with contrast-enhanced mammography. Women will also have standard-of-care mammography/tomosynthesis per usual clinical practice. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IV infiltrate | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Wendie A. Berg | University of Pittsburgh | 412-641-1635 | bergwa@upmc.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 30, 2025 | Nov 21, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Iodinated Contrast Media (ICM) | Drug | supplemental breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced mammography |
|
To assess changes in the biopsy rate after the addition of CEM. DBT biopsy rate for primary observer (usual care) vs DBT and CEM biopsy rate for primary observer.
| 1.5 years |
| Positive Predictive Value of Recall (PPV1) | To assess changes in positive predictive value of recall (PPV1) after the addition of CEM. DBT PPV1for primary observer (usual care) vs DBT and CEM PPV1 for primary observer. | 1.5 years |
| Pittsburgh |
| Pennsylvania |
| 15146 |
| United States |
| Magee-Womens Hospital | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Breast Density | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Menopausal status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Body Mass Index | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
All women received both 3D mammography (DBT) and contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) for breast cancer screening. This group looks at the cancer detection rate per 1,000 screenings for DBT plus CEM for the primary reader/observer. |
|
|
| Secondary | False Positive Recall Rates | To assess changes in false positive recall rates from CEM. DBT false-positive findings for primary observer (usual care) vs DBT and CEM false positive findings for primary observer | Number of participants without cancer, i.e., true negatives (TN) | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percent recalled without cancer | 1.5 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Biopsy Rate | To assess changes in the biopsy rate after the addition of CEM. DBT biopsy rate for primary observer (usual care) vs DBT and CEM biopsy rate for primary observer. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants biopsied | 1.5 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Positive Predictive Value of Recall (PPV1) | To assess changes in positive predictive value of recall (PPV1) after the addition of CEM. DBT PPV1for primary observer (usual care) vs DBT and CEM PPV1 for primary observer. | Number of participants recalled for each arm | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage with a positive biopsy | 1.5 years |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 615 |
| 0 |
| 615 |
| 5 |
| 615 |
| EG001 | Standard Mammography/Tomosynthesis | Women who meet criteria for supplemental screening MRI, but who are unable to have MRI for medical/access/cost reasons, will be invited to have screening with contrast-enhanced mammography. Women will also have standard-of-care mammography/tomosynthesis per usual clinical practice. | 0 | 615 | 0 | 615 | 0 | 615 |
| contrast reaction | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | 3 women who were injected with contrast agent developed a rash or hives within 1 hour, one woman developed a rash or hives within 24 hours. |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |