Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Preimplantation embryo aneuploidy is a major source of adverse outcomes in human reproduction since it leads to implantation failure, early pregnancy loss or severe chromosomal diseases. The risk of embryos aneuploidy is drastically increased after 35 years old. The intra uterine transfer of euploid embryos assessed through such techniques as next-generation sequencing (NGS) based Comprehensive chromosomal Testing of Trophectoderm (TE) biopsies of Blastocysts (CTTEB), may improve implantation and live birth rates, and decrease miscarriage rates. But no randomized controlled trial (RCT) was ever performed to test the interest of CTTEB for women that really needed it (≥35 to ≤ 41 years old). In this multicentre randomized-controlled-trial, the investigators will compare live birth rate obtained after the first single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycle following the freeze-all-Intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle in infertile and old couples between two different strategies of Day 5/6 blastocyst selection:
The presence of chromosomal abnormalities (aneuploidy) in the pre-implantation embryonic stage is one of the major causes of human reproductive disorders, as it is responsible for embryo implantation failures, early or late miscarriages and the birth of children with chromosomal syndromes. This is mainly due to the existence of chromosomal abnormalities of meiotic, especially maternal, or mitotic origin occurring during the first three cell divisions of the embryo. As a result, human embryos have higher rates of aneuploidy than other species. Thus, it has been suggested that only 30% of conceptions reach term.
The objective of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) is to optimize the chances of conception and delivery of healthy new-borns. It is necessary to improve the results of IVF (in vitro fertilization) programs and to reduce adverse effects (miscarriages, multiple pregnancies), especially in couples with patients with poor prognosis, such as older women. The choice of embryos to be transferred is a key step for the success of ART infertility treatments.
Currently, the choice of embryos is based solely on their morphology, evaluated on the 5th or 6th day of development at a stage known as the "blastocyst". Each embryo is observed under the microscope and described according to standardized morphological criteria. This description of the blastocyst is based on 3 constituents of the embryo: the degree of expansion of the blastocoelic cavity, the appearance of the internal cell mass (ICM) and the presence of trophectodermal cells (TE). These criteria have been described as predictive of live birth rates after transfer of fresh or thawed embryos. However, its ability to identify the embryo with the highest potential for implantation is debatable, due to its weak association with embryonic chromosomal status, which is a critical factor in the implant potential of each embryo. In addition, it is known that embryos that do not meet these morphological criteria are discarded, although it has been proven that their transfer could lead to a live birth.
Since the risk of embryonic aneuploidy is significantly increased after the age of 35, the objective of our RCT is to evaluate the efficacy of the CTTEB using the latest technologies and methodologies (i.e., combined embryo culture to blastocyst stage, immediate freezing of the embryonic cohort with delayed transfer, TE biopsy, NGS, and Single Embryo Transfer (SET)) in the management of infertile patients over 35 years of age. The live birth rate obtained after the first transfer of a single frozen embryo will be compared between two groups of couples, randomized in two arms: i) transfer of a single euploid blastocyst; ii) transfer of a single blastocyst of unknown chromosomal status, chosen on the basis of the usual morphological criteria, in the first thawing cycle following the freezing of all the blastocysts of the patient couples.
In addition, the culture medium of each embryo collected will be analysed in a second stage to assess whether it is possible to develop a diagnosis of aneuploidy without the need for trophectoderm biopsy (non invasive).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | No Intervention | Embryo selection according to Day 5/6 usual morphological criteria (Istanbul consensus) | |
| Comprehensive chromosomal Testing of Trophectoderm biopsies of Blastocysts: CTTEB group | Experimental | Trophectoderm cells will be analyzed by NGS. Culture media will also be stored for further non-invasive chromosomal testing. Embryo selection will be done according to international guidelines (www.pgdis.org; Newsletter May 27, 2019). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive chromosomal Testing of Trophectoderm biopsies of Blastocysts (CTTEB) | Procedure | In vitro Fertilization by ICSI then embryo culture until Day 5/6; all blastocysts with morphological scores compatible with TE biopsy and vitrification will be submitted to Comprehensive chromosomal Testing of Trophectoderm biopsies of Blastocysts (CTTEB) and vitrified. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of live birth | To compare live birth rate (LBR) obtained after the first single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycle following the freeze-all-Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle | One year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of live birth taking in consideration further single frozen-thawed blastocyst cycles | To compare live birth rate between both groups from the time where couples are randomized, i.e. in intention to treat principle, taking in consideration further single frozen-thawed blastocyst cycles during the studied period ("cumulative live birth" rate limited to the studied period) | Until 48 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Women :
Inclusion Criteria Men:
Inclusion Criteria Couples:
Criteria after randomization
Couple having at least one blastocyst with morphological score on Day 5/6 of in vitro embryo development (blastocoel expansion ≥3 and inner cell mass graded A, B or C and trophectoderm graded A or B
Exclusion Criteria:
Women:
Men:
- Use of testicular or epididymal sperm
Couples:
Exlusion criteria to check on randomization day :
- Women with less than 3 follicles ≥ 14 mm on the triggering day or the day before the triggering
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catherine Patrat, MD, PhD | Contact | +33 1 58 41 37 34 | catherine.patrat@aphp.fr | |
| Christelle Auger | Contact | +33 1 58 41 11 86 | christelle.auger@aphp.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nelly Frydman, Pharm D, PhD | Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hôpital Jean Verdier | Recruiting | Bondy | 93 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Biological ICSI parameters | Biological ICSI parameters will be assessed using a composite variable defined by:
| 30 months (inclusion period) |
| Pregnancy outcome | Pregnancy parameters will be assessed using a composite variable defined by: - Implantation rate (ratio between gestational sacs and transferred embryo)
| 18 months (participation period) |
| Ratio between the proportion of women with live birth and days after randomization | - Ratio between the proportion of women with live birth and days after randomization | Until 48 months |
| Cost of the procedure | To compare cost of the procedure between both groups and estimate a cost per additional live birth | 18 months (participation period) |
| Efficiency of non-invasive chromosomal testing | Direct cost of non-invasive chromosomal testing, in blastocyst culture conditioned medium, as compared to the referent standard one, after TE biopsies and total cost . | Until 48 months |
| obstetrical parameters | obstetrical parameters will be assessed using a composite variable defined by:
| 18 months (participation period) |
| Perinatal parameters: | Perinatal parameters defined by:
| 18 months (participation period) |
| Perinatal parameters: | Perinatal parameters defined by: • biometry (weight (g)) | 18 months (participation period) |
| Perinatal parameters: | Perinatal parameters defined by:
| 18 months (participation period) |
| Perinatal parameters: | Perinatal parameters defined by: • Apgar score at 1 and 5mn after birth (/10) | 18 months (participation period) |
| Perinatal parameters: | Perinatal parameters defined by:
| 18 months (participation period) |
| Perinatal parameters: | Perinatal parameters defined by: • Number of children with major malformations defined according to the European register EUROCAT) | 18 months (participation period) |
| Hôpital Antoine Béclère | Recruiting | Clamart | 92140 | France |
|
| CHU Clermont-Ferrand | Recruiting | Clermont-Ferrand | 63000 | France |
|
| CHU Dijon | Recruiting | Dijon | 21079 | France |
|
| Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve | Recruiting | Montpellier | 34295 | France |
|
| CHU Nantes | Recruiting | Nantes | 44093 | France |
|
| Hôpital Cochin | Recruiting | Paris | 75014 | France |
|
| Hopital Tenon | Not yet recruiting | Paris | 75020 | France |
|
| CHU Strasbourg | Recruiting | Schiltigheim | 67300 | France |
|
| Hôpital Foch | Recruiting | Suresnes | 92 | France |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007246 | Infertility |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided