Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
There is growing evidence that negative attitudes towards persons affected by suicide (i.e. persons who experience suicidality, persons who lost a loved one to suicide), so called public suicide stigma, is harmful for suicide prevention, for example by reducing social support, inhibiting help-seeking for suicidality and increasing distress as well as suicidality among stigmatized persons. Reducing public suicide stigma could therefore be an important factor of successful suicide prevention. However, reducing public suicide stigma could also be harmful, for example by increasing attitudes that suicidal behaviour is a normal and acceptable solution for crisis situations, which could decrease help-seeking for suicidality and encourage suicidal behaviour. This project will (1) develop four interventions (contact-based vs. education based, video vs. text) hypothesized to reduce public suicide stigma, (2) determine the efficacy of the four interventions with regard to reducing public suicide stigma, (3) identify additional harmful (e.g. normalization of suicidal behaviour) and beneficial intervention effects (e.g. improved attitudes to seek help) and (4) investigate pathways explaining intervention effects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contact Video | Experimental | Participants randomized to this group will watch a video of a person talking about his recovery after attempting suicide. |
|
| Contact Text | Experimental | Participants randomized to this group will read a personal story of a person who survived a suicide attempt. |
|
| Education Video | Experimental | Participants randomized to this group will watch a video of a psychiatrist presenting facts about suicide and suicide prevention. |
|
| Education Text | Experimental | Participants randomized to this group will read a text containing facts about suicide and suicide prevention. |
|
| Control Contact | Placebo Comparator | Participants randomized to this group will read a personal story of a person who survived a heart attack. |
|
| Control Education |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contact Video | Other | No additional information necessary. |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Stigma subscale of the Stigma of Suicide Scale short form (SOSS-SF) | Batterham al. (2013) The Stigma of Suicide Scale. Psychometric properties and correlates of the stigma of suicide. Crisis 34(1):13-21 | Immediately after the intervention (t1) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Stigma subscale of the Stigma of Suicide Scale short form (SOSS-SF) | Batterham al. (2013) The Stigma of Suicide Scale. Psychometric properties and correlates of the stigma of suicide. Crisis 34(1):13-21 | Two weeks after the intervention (t2) |
| Literacy of Suicide Scale (LOSS) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants need to be at least 18 years old, speak German and provide online informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Persons who self-report to have experienced suicidality within three months before baseline will be excluded.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ulm University | Ulm | 89075 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39849424 | Derived | Oexle N, Luhr M, Valacchi D, Rusch N. A web-based pilot randomized controlled trial to test the efficacy of education and contact-based interventions in reducing public suicide stigma. BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06406-7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Anonymized data available upon personal request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013405 | Suicide |
| D057545 | Social Stigma |
| D000092864 | Suicide Prevention |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016728 | Self-Injurious Behavior |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D012919 | Social Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo Comparator |
Participants randomized to this group will read a text containing facts about heart-attacks and their prevention. |
|
| Contact Text |
| Other |
No additional information necessary. |
|
| Education Video | Other | No additional information necessary. |
|
| Education Text | Other | No additional information necessary. |
|
Batterham et al. (2013) Correlates of suicide stigma and suicide literacy in the community. Suicide Life Threat Behav 43(4):406-417 |
| Immediately after the intervention (t1); Two weeks after the intervention (t2) |
| Cognitions Concerning Suicide Scale (CCSS) | Cwik et al. (2017) Measuring attitudes towards suicide: Preliminary evaluation of an attitude towards suicide scale. Compr Psychiatry 72:56-65 | Immediately after the intervention (t1); Two weeks after the intervention (t2) |
| General help-seeking questionnaire suicidal ideation subscale (GHSQ-SI) | Wilson et al. (2005) Measuring help-seeking intentions: Properties of the General Help-Seeking Questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Counselling 39(1):15-28 | Immediately after the intervention (t1); Two weeks after the intervention (t2) |
| Current suicidality | One item adapted from the PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al. 2001; "Do you currently experience thoughts that you would be better off dead or of hurting yourself?" response scale from 1 (not at all) to 7 (very much) | Immediately after the intervention (t1); Two weeks after the intervention (t2) |
| Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), negative affect subscale | Breyer & Bluemke (2016) Deutsche Version der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule PANAS (GESIS Panel). ZIS - GESIS Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences | Immediately after the intervention (t1); Two weeks after the intervention (t2) |
| Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) | Löwe et al. (2005) Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2). Journal of Psychosomatic Research 58(2):163-171 | Two weeks after the intervention (t2) |