Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NL68315.091.19 | Registry Identifier | ABR registry |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| VGZ health insurance (NL) | UNKNOWN |
| Paul Speth Foundation (NL) | UNKNOWN |
| Radboud Oncology Fund (NL) | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The PROMPT study aims to routinely implement genomic pre-sorting of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients for personalized treatment (e.g. immuno-, PARP inhibitors, or platinum-therapy). The investigators hypothesize that, by doing this early in the disease course (before exhausting standard of care options), it will improve treatment planning, patient outcome, quality of life, and reduce costs.
Prostate cancer is a major health problem leading to significant morbidity and mortality in men worldwide. Approved therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) include abiraterone and enzalutamide (targeting the androgen signaling pathway), radium-223 (bone targeting radionuclide therapy), and taxane chemotherapy. Controversy remains on optimal sequencing of available therapeutic agents, and these drugs are still commonly prescribed in a trial-and-error manner. Only a minority of patients receives the full benefit of the anticancer armamentarium, but all experience unnecessary side-effects, quality of life deterioration, and delay in onset to adequate life-prolonging treatment. In addition, the prescription of ineffective drugs and avoidable hospital admissions contribute to the financial burden of health care systems.
In recent years, distinct molecular subsets of prostate cancer have been identified in mCRPC. These molecular defects may guide physicians in proper sequencing of medication and in predicting the individual response more accurately. In previous studies using next-generation sequencing (NGS) mCRPC patients could be grouped into clearly distinct molecular subtypes. Moreover, in these subtypes biomarkers associated with resistance to certain therapies, or biomarkers actually predictive for enhanced response were identified.
In this study the investigators will introduce routine molecular characterization in participants with mCRPC as early as possible in their disease state. Participants will be screened before initiation of second-line treatment, since early identification will maximize clinical and financial benefit. Following screening, participants will be discussed in molecular tumor board and clinical meetings, and stratified to the agent they are most likely to respond to. Translational research is included to identify and validate additional predictive molecular biomarkers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1: no sequencing | Participants in this group, for which DNA sequencing could not be reported due to a variety of (quality/technical) reasons, will be treated with standard of care therapy. This group is therefore comparable to patients treated outside the Radboudumc. |
| |
| Group 2: no druggable aberration | Participants in this group received a DNA sequencing report identifying no biomarkers to which a logical treatment option can be connected. These participants will also receive standard of care therapy. |
| |
| Group 3: allocated to personalized treatment | Participants in this group received a DNA sequencing report which identified presence of a biomarker allowing the participant to be treated with a personalized therapy. This therapy could range from immunotherapy, or PARP inhibitors, to other medication. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biopsy | Procedure | A biopsy will be taken from metastatic tissue, which will be used for DNA sequencing |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Responsiveness ratio | Ratio of radiographic progression-free survival of personalized treatment or standard of care to the standard last line therapy (PFS-MPT-ratio vs PFS-SOC-ratio) | Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy endpoint: ORR | Best objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST1.1 criteria | Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start) |
| Efficacy endpoint: rPFS | Radiographic progresssion free survival (per RECIST1.1) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male aged 18 or older with adenocarcinoma of the prostate defined by: Documented histopathology at diagnosis of prostate adenocarcinoma without evidence of predominant or primary neuroendocrine histology.
Patients with a metastatic tumor site accessible for image-guided biopsy and allowing research analyses for this trial (e.g. biomarker testing by genomic, proteomic or transcriptomic assessment). A waiver can be made for patients presenting with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), and no easily accessible tumour for biopsy and suitable primary tissue available for NGS.
Castration-resistant state (defined as disease progressing despite [chemical] castration per PCWG3 criteria)
Progressive disease as either
At least one metastatic lesion present at baseline CT, MRI, 68Ga/18F-PSMA PET or bone scan
ECOG Performance status 0 to 2
Serum testosterone on castration level
Adequate renal function:
• MDRD-GFR ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73m2
Adequate bone marrow function:
Adequate liver function:
Estimated life expectancy > 12 months
Willing and able to comply to the research protocol
Signed, written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 600 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with clinical, radiographic or biochemical disease progression may be included in this study. The expected number of patients eligible for the protocol is well above 200 patients per year, including referrals from regional/community hospitals.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Niven Mehra, MD, PhD | Contact | +312410354 | niven.mehra@radboudumc.nl | |
| Iris Kloots, MD | Contact | iris.kloots@radboudumc.nl |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radboud UMC | Recruiting | Nijmegen | Gelderland | 6500HB | Netherlands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001706 | Biopsy |
| D001800 | Blood Specimen Collection |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003581 | Cytodiagnosis |
| D003584 | Cytological Techniques |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
CT-guided biopsies from lymph node, soft tissue, viscera and bone are collected. Blood and urine specimens are collected.
| Blood sample | Procedure | Blood samples will be taken for additional translational research |
|
| Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start) |
| Efficacy endpoint: PSA response | PSA decline >50% at 12 weeks or later | Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start) |
| Efficacy endpoint: PSA-PFS | Time to PSA progression (per PCWG3 criteria) | Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start) |
| Efficacy endpoint: OS | Overall survival capped at 1 year | Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start) |
| Quality of life endpoint: EORTC-QLQ-30 | Score of EORTC-QLQ-30 questionnaire | Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start) |
| Quality of life endpoint: EPIC-26 | Score of EPIC-26 questionnaire | Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start) |
| Quality of life endpoint: EQ-5D-5L | Score of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire | Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start) |
| Quality of life endpoint: BIP-SF | Score of BIP-SF questionnaire | Throughout completion of study (estimated 5 years from start) |
| Medical Resource Utilization (MRU); nr of lines | Averaged number of lines of standard care per year | At the end of year 1, year 2, year 3, and at completion of the study (estimated end of year 5) |
| Medical Resource Utilization (MRU); costs | Averaged costs of standard care per year | At the end of year 1, year 2, year 3, and at completion of the study (estimated end of year 5) |
| Medical Resource Utilization (MRU); treatment-related costs | Averaged costs of treatment-related resource utilization (e.g. admissions in ward or ICU) per admission and/or per duration | At the end of year 1, year 2, year 3, and at completion of the study (estimated end of year 5) |
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D011677 | Punctures |