Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Oslo University Hospital | OTHER |
| Vestre Viken Hospital Trust | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The rate of labor induction has been steadily increasing over the last years, both worldwide and in Norway. Norwegian women are hospitalized when prostaglandins are used to induce labor. In Denmark, a neighboring country to Norway, women have been offered outpatient induction of labor using oral misoprostol for several years.
The overall aim of this study is to investigate if outpatient induction of labor is beneficial in a Norwegian setting. This includes:
This is a non-randomized prospective pilot- and feasibility study, collecting data from electronical records. In addition, the study participants are invited to write a diary during the labor induction process and a questionnaire six weeks postpartum. Eligible patients include low-risk nulliparous women induced with low-dose oral misoprostol.
The labor induction rate in Norway has increased from 10,5 % in 2000 to 26,1 % in 2019. This represents an important shift in the obstetric care, making labor induction one of the most common obstetrical interventions. The increase alters the population being induced, as it now includes more low-risk births compared to 20 years ago. The low risk labor inductions might not require the same repeated cardiotocography and inpatient care before onset of active labor as complicated pregnancies.
In 2017, a 25 μg misoprostol tablet for oral administration was approved for labor induction in the Nordic countries. Oral administration is user friendly, and low-dose orally administrated misoprostol is considered to have a favorable safety profile compared to many other induction methods, with low risk of hyperstimulation.
Despite the widespread knowledge of the importance of women´s labor experience for her future health, this aspect is rarely thoroughly explored in the vast number of studies on labor induction. For outpatient labor induction to work, it must be an alternative women find beneficial, as well as clinicians and the health care system.
Aim
The overall aim of this study is to investigate if outpatient induction of labor is beneficial in a Norwegian setting. This includes:
Study A. To investigate the clinical outcomes and feasibility of inducing in an outpatient setting compared to an inpatient setting in Norway Study B. To explore low-risk nulliparous women's experiences of labor induction in inpatient and outpatient settings.
Design and methods
Study A is a prospective non-randomized multicenter pilot- and feasibility study. Data are collected from the patient's electronical records. Study B is a mixed methods cross-sectional diary study, collecting data from the participants diaries and questionnaire and their electronical records. Both studies include the same participants.
In both the inpatient and outpatient regime, the women are induced with 25 μg misoprostol tablets administrated orally every two hours. Some of the women will be induced using a balloon catheter before misoprostol. In the inpatient regime, cardiotocography (CTG) will be performed according to standard protocol; every 4-6 hours or on indication. In the outpatient protocol, a CTG will be carried out before and after the administration of the first misoprostol. If the CTG is normal and the woman has no contractions, the woman can go home, provided a normal ultrasound scan from the last three weeks. An appointment will be set up no later than 24 hours later for a new CTG and assessment of the induction process and the health of the woman and fetus. If the woman goes home after this consultation, she will return no later than 24 hours later for inpatient labor induction if the labor does not start.
Women choosing the outpatient protocol will receive oral and written information about what they should be aware of and when to contact the maternity ward. They are welcome to contact the maternity ward at any time to seek advice from a midwife with experience in labor induction.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | No Intervention | The baseline arm includes participants from before the implementation of the outpatient regime. All participants are induced according to the standard inpatient protocol. | |
| Women choosing to stay at the hospital | Active Comparator | Include women who choose to stay at the hospital after implementing an outpatient alternative. |
|
| Women choosing to go home | Experimental | Include women who choose the outpatient regime. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outpatient labor induction | Other | The participants stay at home during til labor induction process and are admitted to hospital at the onset of labor or if a complication occur. Outpatient consultations once a day. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The proportion of eligible women selecting outpatient labor induction | up to 18 months | |
| Fetal metabolic acidosis | The proportion of fetal metabolic acidosis | From delivery and within two hours postpartum |
| Deliveries outside the hospital | The proportion of deliveries outside the hospital in the outpatient versus inpatient induction group | At time of delivery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Delivery mode | Mutually exclusive categories, either spontaneous vaginal birth, either instrumental vaginal birth, either operative delivery by cesarean section | At the time of delivery |
| Indications for operative delivery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vestre Viken Health Trust, Drammen Hospital | Drammen | Norway | ||||
| Oslo University Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39878306 | Derived | Marsdal KE, Sorbye IK, Bernitz S, Adan N, Grodal EB, Jacobsen AF, Lukasse M. Clinical outcomes and feasibility of implementing outpatient labor induction with misoprostol: A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Apr;104(4):647-657. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15029. Epub 2025 Jan 29. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Inpatient labor induction | Other | The participants are induced following standard inpatient care |
|
Indications for cesarean delivery or operative vaginal delivery
| At the time of delivery |
| Uterine rupture | During labor induction or birth |
| Maternal admission to ICU or maternal death | From start of induction through discharge, normally within 2-4 days after delivery |
| Maternal hemorrhage (in ml) | During birth and until two hours after delivery |
| Chorioamnionitis | Number of participants with clinical chorioamnionitis | During birth and until two hours after delivery |
| Perineal injury | Perineal third or forth degree lacerations and epiosotomy | At the time of delivery |
| Perinatal death | From start of induction until 1 week after delivery |
| Need for neonatal resuscitation after delivery | Within two hours after delivery |
| Uterine tachysystole | From start of induction until delivery |
| Admission to NICU due to birth related issues | From delivery until discharge, usually 2-4 days after delivery, maximum of 1 week postpartum |
| Apgar score | Score 0 to 10 where 10 is highest score indicating most vital neonate | 1, 5 and 10 minutes after delivery |
| Umbilical cord pH and pCO2 | Immediately after delivery |
| Presence of meconium in amniotic fluid | From start of induction until delivery |
| Duration of the stages during induction and birth | Time from start of medication to start of active labor, labor duration, duration of hospital stay | From start of induction until transfer top postpartum ward |
| Contact with the hospital during the labor induction process | Counting number of contacts adding up to a total | From start of induction until hospital admission |
| Misoprostol administration | Total misoprostol dose, delay of medicament administration | From start of induction until start of active labor |
| Need for other interventions to induce or augment labor | From start of induction until start of active labor |
| The experience of labor induction | The Experiences of Induction Tool (EXIT), a validated instrument to measure the experiences of labor induction Minimum score per item is 1, maximum is 5, the higher the score the more positive the experience. | 6-8 weeks postpartum |
| The experience of childbirth | The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ), a validated instrument to measure the experience of childbirth, 4 domains, mean for each domain will be calculated and compared, the higher mean per domain the more positive the birth experience, lowest mean per domain is 1 highest is 4. | 6-8 weeks postpartum |
| Postnatal depression | The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale-short version (EPDS-5), Minimum score 0, maximum score 15, cut-off 7 or more The higher the score the more symptoms of depression | 6-8 weeks postpartum |
| The Early Labor Experience | Swedish Early Labor Questionnaire for primiparous women (SWE-ELEQ-PP), a validated instrument to measure measure the experience of early labor, 22 items mean score is calculated, higher score is better experience, minimum score per items is 1 maximum is 5 | From start of induction until delivery and 6-8 weeks postpartum |
| Oslo |
| Norway |