Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Institut Straumann AG | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The utilization of SLActive implants which allow more rapid osseointgeration with 3 to 4 weeks. will be placed in thin buccal bone as immediate implants to determine the resorption compared to thick buccal bone
With the increased demand for aesthetics and the expectation of immediate tooth replacement, improving the treatment options in case with hopeless teeth in the esthetic zone by immediate implants is a need by both practitioners and patients.
Current guidelines, today, restricting such treatment to only thick (+ or = 1mm) buccal bone plates. However, the literature shows that less than 10% of the community have such criteria, making it a high risk but needed procedure.
Soft tissue and bone remodelling after extraction is an inescapable fact. Immediate implant placement cannot prevent soft tissue and bone remodeling around implants (Araújo et al. 2005, Chen et al. 2009), but implant surface treatment and modifications might enhance the maintainability of the supporting structures around the dental implant due to its faster integration, better stimulating the vascular components at the site. This could be tested by the crestal and buccal bone changes, pink esthetic score and ostell readings.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| thin buccal bone | Active Comparator |
| |
| thick buccal bone | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| immediate implant placement | Device | Minimally traumatic tooth extraction, immediate implant placement and hard tissue grafting. loading after 3 months. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Bucccal bone changes | standardized Cone beam computed Tomography The radiograph will be taken preoperatively and 12 month after. The pre and post operative cone beams will be compared to each other observing any changes of the buccal bone at 2 , 4 and 6 mm from the crest, the measurements will be in mm | 12 months post loading |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant stability | Ostell readings in isq (range from 55 till over 70) bleow 55 low stability over 55 till 65 moderate stability above 70 good stability | 3 months |
| Crestal bone changes | Periapical radiograph the measurements will be taken from the platform of the implants. 3 readings will be taken one at the paltform one above and one below according to pattern and form of the resorption. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo University | Cairo | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38380779 | Derived | ElNahass H, Tawfik OK, Naiem SN, Zazou N, Moussa M. Evaluation of buccal bone resorption in immediate implant placement in thin versus thick buccal bone plates: An 18-month follow-up prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024 Jun;26(3):532-544. doi: 10.1111/cid.13312. Epub 2024 Feb 21. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 12 months post loading |
| Soft tissue thickness | Periodontal probe | 3 months |
| Post operative pain and swelling | Blinded assessment ( numerical score) | 1 week |
| Buccal bone thickness | Cone Beam Computed Topography | 3 months |
| Postsurgical satisfaction | Questionnaire | 1 week |
| Pink aesthetic score | Pink esthetic score Scale 0 being the lowest and 14 highest attainable | 12 months post loading |