Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Excelya | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and the efficacy of an hydrogel (double cross-link microgel - DXM) injection into the intervertebral disc (IVD) space in patients with painful lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) over 24 to 48 weeks.
After being informed of the study and the potential risks, all patients matching the eligibility criteria and who have given their written consent will undergo a gel injection at day 0 after a period of screening of up to 14 days.
Then, they will be followed-up for a variable period according to the cohort :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| single-arm of 3 cohorts | Experimental | These patients will be sequentially recruited in 3 cohorts :
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double Crosslink Microgel | Device | DXM hydrogel is a pH responsive Double Cross-Linked microgel based on single internally cross-linked microspheres (comprising a methacrylic acid-methyl methacrylate-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate copolymer) The DXM gel is injected into the intervertebral disc (IVD) space via a standardised procedure similar to the routinely-performed Discography procedure. The disc approach described in the discography procedure has been reported to allow the injection of a solution in the centre of the disc. The injection of the gel takes about 2 min. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The number of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient exposed to a medical device and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this medical device. An AE can therefore be any unintended disease or injury or clinical signs (including an abnormal laboratory finding) in subjects, users or other persons whether or not considered related to the investigational medical device. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an AE that:
| Between screening visit and 24 weeks (measured at each visits) |
| The number of adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse event (SAEs) | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient exposed to a medical device and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this medical device. An AE can therefore be any unintended disease or injury or clinical signs (including an abnormal laboratory finding) in subjects, users or other persons whether or not considered related to the investigational medical device. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an AE that:
| Between screening visit and 24 weeks (measured at each visits) |
| The number of patients with neurological changes during the follow-up period according to the evaluation of nerve root pain, sensory deficit and motor deficit |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The number of patients with at least one adverse event (AE) or serious adverse event (SAE) | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient exposed to a medical device and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this medical device. An AE can therefore be any unintended disease or injury or clinical signs (including an abnormal laboratory finding) in subjects, users or other persons whether or not considered related to the investigational medical device. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an AE that:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female patient aged between 18 and 55 (inclusive)
Discogenic low back pain, confirmed by a history of Low Back Pain, with a minimum of 3 months of continuous pain or 6 months of acute episodes of pain despite the conservative treatment including painkillers and physiotherapy
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ≥ 30% and ≤ 60%,
Painful disc(s) between L1 and S1 represented
Patients with a Zung depression score ≤ 49, Note: Patients with a Zung depression score between ≥ 50 and ≤ 64 may be included if deemed suitable for trial inclusion by the investigator
Partial dehydration (grey disc) confirmed by MRI, grade II/III Pfirrmann classification
Note:
Female patients of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening and use an effective birth control during the follow up period after the injection procedure
Patients who are willing and capable of understanding the investigator's explanations, following his instructions and adhering to the follow-up visits according to the study protocol, including a willingness and ability to undergo MRI scanning,
Patient giving informed consent to take part in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Averted nerve root pain and potential root compression Note: Referred leg pain authorised
Presence of posterior bone spurs (osteophytes)
Partial or total Modic signal grade 1 at the considered disc level
Patients with active systemic infection or infection localized to the site of the proposed implantation.
Any conditions not described in the indications for use.
Any mental conditions or neuromuscular disease that may generate an unacceptable risk of failure or postoperative complication.
Patients with existing disc herniation at the considered level and on adjacent discs
Endplate disease, defect or weakness, e.g. Schmorl nodule
Vertebral bone abnormalities with active angioma
Disc collapse ≥ 15% when disc height is compared to the height of the upper adjacent disc
One lumbar disc rated grade IV or V on the Pfirrmann classification
Imaging showing facet arthrosis
Lytic spondylolisthesis
Degenerative spondylolisthesis grade > grade I Meyerding
Congenital or idiopathic deformities of the spine (e.g. Scoliosis >20° Cobb or Kyphosis)
Old or acute vertebral fractures in the lumbar spine
Patients with any prior spine procedure in the lumbar spine
Any skin disease or inadequate tissue coverage at the site of the injection
Any medical or surgical conditions that could preclude the potential benefit of disc injection must be carefully analysed before the procedure, such as congenital abnormalities, immunosuppressive disease, elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) or C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration not explained by other diseases, elevation of white blood cell (WBC) count, or marked left shift in the WBC differential count, should be carefully taken into consideration prior to the surgical procedure.
Note: These contra-indications can be relative or absolute and must be taken into account by the physician when making his decision. The above list is not exhaustive.
Tumours with any metastatic potential, or known metastases, in any part of the body
Known infection with HIV or Hepatitis B, C or E
Patient that has received or is seeking employee compensation
Zung depression score ≥ 65
Substance abuse or dependency (pharmaceuticals, drugs, alcohol)
Disabling obesity (BMI > 35kg/m²)
History of chemical dependency (e.g. illicit drugs, or opiates) or significant emotional or psychosocial disturbance which may have an effect on treatment outcome
Patients who are pregnant, breast feeding or planning pregnancy during the study
Anticoagulation (beyond low level prophylactic doses of single anti-platelet agents)
Inability to undertake or known contra-indications to MRI scanning
Known hypersensitivity to barium sulphate
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Goldsmith, Pr | Contact | +44 (0)1625 238 603 | contact@gelmetix.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord Aquitaine Centre Vertebra | Recruiting | Bordeaux | 33300 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is an adaptative-design, interventional, open-label, single-arm trial performed at a single centre in France.
3 cohorts will be sequentially initiated according to the DSMB review of the safety parameters :
The safety primary endpoints of each cohort will be assessed by an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) at Day 42 post-injection to provide safety oversight on the patients and guidance on initiating the study on the next cohort.
Patients will be injected at day 0 and will be followed-up for a variable period according to the cohort.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
The neurological evaluation will look more specifically for:
|
| Between screening visit and 24 weeks (measured at each visits) |
| The change of the water content of the nucleus measured in milliseconds on the MRI during the follow-up period | The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will allow the observation. | Between screening visit and 24 weeks (measured at each visits) |
| The modifications observed after the injection in the adjacent tissues of the injected nucleus | The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will allow the observation of the corresponding adjacent tissues:
| Between screening visit and 24 weeks (measured at each visits) |
| The change of the intervertebral height in millimetres of the injected disc | The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will allow the observation. | Between screening visit and 24 weeks (measured at each visits) |
| The change of the DXM gel position in relation to posterior and anterior limit of the annulus fibrosus and vertebral disc end-plates | The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will allow the observation. | Between screening visit and 24 weeks (measured at each visits) |
| Over 48 weeks for the first cohort (1L) / 36 weeks for the second cohort (2L) / 24 weeks for the third cohort (1-2L) |
| The number of adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse event (SAEs) | An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient exposed to a medical device and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this medical device. An AE can therefore be any unintended disease or injury or clinical signs (including an abnormal laboratory finding) in subjects, users or other persons whether or not considered related to the investigational medical device. A serious adverse event (SAE) is defined as an AE that:
| Over 48 weeks for the first cohort (1L) / 36 weeks for the second cohort (2L) / 24 weeks for the third cohort (1-2L) |
| The number of patients with neurological changes during the follow-up period according to the evaluation of nerve root pain, sensory deficit and motor deficit | The neurological evaluation will look more specifically for:
| Over 48 weeks for the first cohort (1L) / 36 weeks for the second cohort (2L) / 24 weeks for the third cohort (1-2L) |
| The change of the water content of the nucleus measured in milliseconds on the MRI during the follow-up period | The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will allow the observation. | Over 48 weeks for the first cohort (1L) / 36 weeks for the second cohort (2L) / 24 weeks for the third cohort (1-2L) |
| The modifications observed after the injection in the adjacent tissues of the injected nucleus | The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will allow the observation of the corresponding adjacent tissues:
| Over 48 weeks for the first cohort (1L) / 36 weeks for the second cohort (2L) / 24 weeks for the third cohort (1-2L) |
| The change of the intervertebral height in millimetres of the injected disc | The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will allow the observation. | Over 48 weeks for the first cohort (1L) / 36 weeks for the second cohort (2L) / 24 weeks for the third cohort (1-2L) |
| The change of the DXM gel position in relation to posterior and anterior limit of the annulus fibrosus and vertebral disc end-plates | The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will allow the observation. | Over 48 weeks for the first cohort (1L) / 36 weeks for the second cohort (2L) / 24 weeks for the third cohort (1-2L) |
| Oswestry disability index (ODI) | The ODI score is based on a self-completed questionnaire of 10 items to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. It is a well-recognised, gold standard orthopaedic score devised in 1980 and which still remains the best and most reliable measure of the overall impact of spinal disease associated with low back pain and any interventions patients may receive. It has been repeatedly used for natural history studies, cohort studies, and for many device and surgery interventions. It is reproducible, reliable and responsive to therapeutic interventions. | Measured and compared to baseline at the different time points of the flowchart according to the cohort (over 24 to 48 weeks) |
| Visual analogue scale (VAS) self-assessment | The visual analogue self-assessment scale is an evaluation performed by the patient to specify his level of pain on a scale of 'no pain' to 'extreme pain'. During the site visit, the VAS is to be filled on-site by the patient and collected by the site staff. | Measured and compared to baseline at the different time points of the flowchart according to the cohort (over 24 to 48 weeks) |
| Working status | The working status will be collected by interviewing the patient about his/her work activity. | measured and compared to baseline at the different time points of the flowchart according to the cohort (over 24 to 48 weeks) |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055959 | Intervertebral Disc Degeneration |
| C535531 | Intervertebral disc disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided