Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recruitment of the number of required patients not completed
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The majority of patients suffering an Achilles tendon rupture develop long term functional deficits in the affected leg. The goal of the proposed study is to evaluate a new rehabilitation protocol using Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) for reducing muscle atrophy and improving tendon properties. If proven beneficial, the proposed protocol can be easily adopted and incorporated as part of routine care for Achilles tendon rupture.
Achilles Tendon Ruptures (ATR) are common and permanently affect the function of the lower leg. Regardless of treatment approach the majority of patients develop long term functional deficits, which include decreased plantar flexion strength, lower heel-rise height, and altered gait patterns. It is believed that tendon lengthening and calf muscle atrophy, which develop during the first few weeks of recovery, are major factors contributing to these functional deficits. The initial development of atrophy is likely caused by reduced loading and muscle activity of the affected leg. However, long-term atrophy may be related to tendon elongation. On the other hand, tendon elongation initially rises during the first few weeks of unloading and slowly reduces, but not completely, when loading is resumed. However, atrophied calf muscles may not provide sufficient loading for optimal tendon recovery. Therefore, there seems to be vicious spiral between tendon elongation and muscle atrophy.
The objective of this study is to develop a neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) rehabilitation protocol for Achilles tendon ruptures. Our preliminary data has shown that force applied to the tendon can be modulated using electrical intensity and pad placement. Therefore, NMES can produce significant contraction in the calf muscles and induce controllable, low-magnitude, cyclic loading to the tendon; which cannot be achieved with voluntary muscle contractions. This approach can potentially overcome limitations of the current rehabilitation protocols.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation | Active Comparator | Neuromuscular electrical stimulation will be applied to the calf muscles. The level of stimulation will be increased weekly from 10 to 30 mA during the first 6 weeks after surgery. In addition, patients will follow standard therapy for Achilles tendon repair. |
|
| Control | No Intervention | Patients will follow standard therapy for Achilles tendon repair. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| neuromuscular electrical stimulation | Device | All subjects will receive standard rehabilitation for Achilles tendon repair. In addition, neuromuscular electrical stimulation will be applied to the calf muscles of the injured leg. The stimulation volume, the electrode placement and the intensity of the stimulation will be selected based on the mechanical strength of healing Achilles tendon. The intervention will be applied for 6 weeks after repair. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ability to perform a single heel rise | The ability of patients to perform a single heel rise using the injured will be tested. | Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tendon length | Length from the tendon insertion to the myotendinous junction | Week 6 and12 |
| Tendon cross-sectional area | Area of the tendon measured via ultrasound imaging at the rupture location |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Penn State University | State College | Pennsylvania | 16802 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 19, 2024 | Sep 29, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2026 | Feb 12, 2026 | 8 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Week 6, 12 |
| Gastrocnemius muscle cross-sectional area | Area of the tendon measured via ultrasound imaging at the rupture location | Week 1, 6, 12 |
| Soleus muscle cross-sectional area | Area of the tendon measured via ultrasound imaging at the rupture location | Week 1, 6, 12 |
| Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) | Score that assesses patient pain, other symptoms, function in daily living, function in sport and recreation, and foot/ankle related quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100 with a score of 0 indicating the worst possible foot/ankle symptoms and 100 indicating no foot/ankle symptoms. | Week 6, 12 |
| Achilles Total Rupture Score | It consists of ten items evaluating aspects of symptoms and function. Each item has scores ranging between 0 and 10 on a Likert scale. The instrument therefore has a maximum score of 100, which corresponds to no symptoms and full function. | Week 6, 12 |
| Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) | Questionnaire based on evaluation of fear of movement, fear of physical activity, and fear avoidance. The total score of the scale range from 17- 68, where 17 means no kinesiophobia, 68 means severe kinesiophobia, and score ± 37 indicates there is kinesiophobia. | Week 6, 12 |