Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) with hemodynamic monitoring may not be of benefit to all elective patients undergoing major abdominal surgery, particularly those managed in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols (ERAS) setting.
Our study compared two groups of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a control group (CG) in which standard haemodynamic monitoring was used, and a study group (SG) in which extended haemodynamic monitoring was applied with appropriate intraoperative interventions. Differences in intraoperative fluid management, hospital stay, and postoperative morbidity were observed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | No Intervention | Standard perioperative anesthesia management | |
| Study group | Active Comparator | Perioperative extended haemodynamic monitoring of fluid loading, cardiac output and changes of peripheral vascular resistance by analysing the arterial curve was provided by non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring (LIDCO Rapid, Lidco Ltd., United Kingdom).In SG fluid optimisation was performed before pneumoperitoneum and after abdominal desuflation with actions to achieved CI, MAP and SI within 80% of baseline values. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perioperative fluid optimisation | Procedure | In case of stroke volume variation (SVV) >10% and SI and CI >10% below the starting value, fluid challenge was performed with approximately 2 ml/kg of colloid over maximum of 5 minutes. The response was monitored. If there was a fall in SVV and an increase in SI of >10% and the SVV still >10%, the second fluid challenge was performed. If there was still a reduction in SVV after the second fluid challenge, but an increase in nSI <10% and decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR), no additional fluids were given. Vasoactive drugs were used instead. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of hospitalisation | 1 month after admission |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Perioperative complications | 8 days after surgery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alenka Spindler Vesel, asoc Prof | Department of anesthesiology and surgical intensive care | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Medical Centre Ljubljana | Ljubljana | 1000 | Slovenia |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|