A 52-week, Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group, Multi-centre, Non-inferiority Study Assessing Exacerbation Rate, Additional Measures of Asthma Control and Safety in Adult and Adolescent Severe Asthmatic Participants With an Eosinophilic Phenotype Treated With GSK3511294 Compared With Mepolizumab or Benralizumab
A 52-week, Randomised, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Parallel Group, Multi-centre, Non-inferiority Study Assessing Exacerbation Rate, Additional Measures of Asthma Control and Safety in Adult and Adolescent Severe Asthmatic Participants With an Eosinophilic Phenotype Treated With GSK3511294 Compared With Mepolizumab or Benralizumab
This study will assess whether switching participants who have benefitted from mepolizumab or benralizumab to GSK3511294 (Depemokimab) is non-inferior to maintaining current treatment on the annualized rate of clinically significant exacerbations in participants with severe asthma with an eosinophilic phenotype. Throughout the study, all participants will continue their non-biologic Baseline standard of care (SoC) asthma treatment.
Key inclusion criteria for study:
Adult and adolescent participants more than or equal to (>=)12 years of age, at the time of signing the informed consent/assent.
Participants who have a documented physician diagnosis of asthma for >=2 years that meets the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines (NHLBI) or Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines.
Participants receiving either mepolizumab 100 milligrams (mg) or benralizumab 30 mg for >=12 months prior to screening and have a documented benefit to therapy assessed by either:
(i) >=50% reduction in exacerbation frequency since initiating treatment, or (ii) >=50% reduction in maintenance OCS use since initiating treatment, or (iii) No exacerbations in the past 6 months whilst receiving anti-IL-5/5R therapy and an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 score of less than or equal to (<=)1.5 at screening.
A well-documented requirement for regular treatment with medium to high dose ICS in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 with or without maintenance OCS. The maintenance ICS dose must be >=440 micrograms (mcg) fluticasone propionate (FP) hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) product daily, or clinically comparable. Participants who are treated with medium dose ICS will also need to be treated with a LABA to qualify for inclusion.
Current treatment with at least one additional controller medication, besides ICS [for example (e.g.), LABA, LAMA, leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), or theophylline].
Key exclusion criteria for study:
Key exclusion criteria for randomization:
Macquarie University, New South Wales 2109, Australia
Zrifin, 70300, Israel
Monserrato CA, 09042, Italy
Torrette AN, 60020, Italy
Shibuya-Ku, Tokyo 150-8935, Japan
Ehime, 790-0024, Japan
Hokkaido, 064-0804, Japan
Lrenskog, 1478, Norway
La Laguna Santa Cruz, 38320, Spain
MErida Badajoz, 06800, Spain
Pozuelo de AlarcOn Madr, 28223, Spain
Via-Real CastellOn, 12540, Spain
Banchiau Taipei, 220, Taiwan
Linkou - Taoyuan Hsien, 333, Taiwan
Bristol Avon, BS10 5NB, United Kingdom