Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background: Somatosensory- (SSEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are commonly used as an intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring tool to detect aberrations to the spinal cord integrity during spinal surgery. Inhalational anaesthetic agents have a significant influence on evoked potentials by suppressing the amplitude and prolonging the latency. Evidences suggest that total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is superior to inhalation anaesthesia for neuromonitoring in spinal surgery, and support the use of up to 0.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhalational anaesthetic agents in these procedures.
Methods: Patients undergoing spinal surgeries will be prospectively recruited and be induced with TIVA at baseline of the evoked potentials. They will be randomized to receive balance anaesthesia with A) Desflurane MAC 0.5+remifentanil, or B) Desflurane MAC 0.75+remifentanil until the end of surgery. Influence of 1.0 MAC desflurane on the evoked potentials after the completion of surgery will also be studied.
Desired Results: Endpoints include the changes to the amplitude and latency of SSEPs and MEPs with 0.5 and 0.75 MAC desflurane. The findings will indicate the safety of desflurane at the studied concentrations for spinal surgeries, and substantial savings with the use of desflurane instead of TIVA.
Recording of Evoked Potentials characteristics:
The following characteristics of the evoked potential signals will be recorded:
Anaesthesia variables:
At the time of recording of evoked potentials:
- Intraoperative temperature, blood pressure, ETCO2, anaesthesia depth - bispectral index monitoring (BIS), remifentanil TCI, MAC of desflurane, Train of Four, volume of propofol and remifentanil until randomization, total volume of desflurane and remifentanil used, anaesthetic medications used, FiO2, SpO2
Patient characteristics:
- Age, gender, race, weight, BMI, medications used, haematocrit, preop blood glucose (for Diabetics)
Safety considerations:
'Recommended standards for intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials', Guideline 11B of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (2009) and 'Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring' will form the basis of the safety aspects of the study.
Conduct of Anaesthesia:
Group A- Anaesthesia maintained with 0.5 MAC desflurane/remifentanil infusion Group B- Anaesthesia maintained with 0.75MAC desflurane/remifentanil infusion
All patients will get additional analgesics and antiemetics as deemed necessary. Post-operative recovery will follow the standard industry norms.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.75 MAC desflurane | Experimental | The effects of 0.75 MAC desflurane on the amplitude and latency of evoked potentials in spinal surgeries will be examined. |
|
| 0.5 MAC desflurane | Active Comparator | The effects of 0.5 MAC desflurane on the amplitude and latency of evoked potentials in spinal surgeries will be examined. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 MAC desflurane | Drug | Following induction of anesthesia by propofol, the patients will be maintained on 0.5 MAC desflurane with remifentanil infusion during spinal surgery. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of 0.5 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Amplitude (microvolts) | Amplitude of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.5 MAC desflurane | During surgery |
| Effect of 0.5 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Latency (milliseconds) | Latency of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.5 MAC desflurane | During surgery |
| Effect of 0.5 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Morphology (appearance of the response) | Morphology of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.5 MAC desflurane | During surgery |
| Effect of 0.75 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Amplitude (microvolts) | Amplitude of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.75 MAC desflurane | During surgery |
| Effect of 0.75 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Latency (milliseconds) | Latency of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.75 MAC desflurane | During surgery |
| Effect of 0.75 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Morphology (appearance of the response) | Morphology of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 0.75 MAC desflurane | During surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effect of 1.0 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Amplitude (microvolts) | Amplitude of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 1.0 MAC desflurane | intraoperative |
| Effect of 1.0 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Latency (milliseconds) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wai May Leong, MMed | Changi General Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changi General Hospital | Singapore | 529889 | Singapore |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30058437 | Background | Hasan MS, Tan JK, Chan CYW, Kwan MK, Karim FSA, Goh KJ. Comparison between effect of desflurane/remifentanil and propofol/remifentanil anesthesia on somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery-A randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018 May-Aug;26(3):2309499018789529. doi: 10.1177/2309499018789529. | |
| 24643708 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077335 | Desflurane |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005019 | Ethyl Ethers |
| D004987 | Ethers |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D008738 | Methyl Ethers |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 0.75 MAC desflurane | Drug | Following induction of anesthesia by propofol, the patients will be maintained on 0.75 MAC desflurane with remifentanil infusion during spinal surgery. |
|
|
| 1.0 MAC desflurane | Drug | On completion of the neuromonitoring phase of surgery, the patients will be maintained on 1.0 MAC desflurane with remifentanil infusion. |
|
|
Latency of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 1.0 MAC desflurane |
| intraoperative |
| Effect of 1.0 MAC desflurane on evoked potentials - Morphology (appearance of the response) | Morphology of somatosensory- and motor- evoked potentials with use of 1.0 MAC desflurane | intraoperative |
| Sloan TB, Toleikis JR, Toleikis SC, Koht A. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery with total intravenous anesthesia or balanced anesthesia with 3% desflurane. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Feb;29(1):77-85. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9571-9. Epub 2014 Mar 19. |
| 24055297 | Background | Macdonald DB, Skinner S, Shils J, Yingling C; American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Dec;124(12):2291-316. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Sep 18. |
| D006845 |
| Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated |
| D006846 | Hydrocarbons, Halogenated |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |