Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Pfizer | INDUSTRY |
| The Institute for Family Health | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Chronic pain is highly prevalent, compromises quality of life, and increases care utilization. Primary care providers are challenged to provide effective treatments, use opioid therapy appropriately, and address the adverse consequences of pain. Technology-enabled decision support tools may provide a means to improve pain management in primary care.
The objective of this study was to evaluate a novel electronic health record (EHR)-based decision support tool-plus-education intervention for pain management in primary care.
This randomized, wait-list controlled trial evaluated a novel EHR-based system for pain management among patients with chronic pain in six practices of a Federally Qualified Health Center network in New York.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early intervention | Experimental | Three sites received the Pain Management Support System for Primary Care (PMSS-PC) integrated into the Electronic Health Record. |
|
| Delayed intervention | Other | Delayed wait-list control group. Three additional sites received the intervention 6 months after the first arm. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early intervention | Other | The Pain Management Support System for Primary Care (PMSS-PC) generated "best practice alerts" and gave clinicians access to a pain assessment template, measures of psychological distress and substance use, guidelines for drug and non-drug therapies, and facilitated referrals. At implementation, clinicians at the practices were offered in-person and virtual education through six webinars on best practices for pain. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Worst Pain Intensity | Worst pain intensity score on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Scores range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe worst pain intensity. | From baseline to 6 months following intervention implementation |
| Average Pain Intensity | Average pain intensity score on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Scores range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe average pain intensity. | From baseline to 6 months following intervention implementation |
| Pain Interference with Function | Pain interference T-score, measured on the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form. Higher scores indicate more pain interference with function. | From baseline to 6 months following intervention implementation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Worst Pain Intensity | Worst pain intensity score on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Scores range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe worst pain intensity. | From 6 to 12 months following intervention implementation |
| Average Pain Intensity |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018479 | Early Intervention, Educational |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002662 | Child Health Services |
| D003153 | Community Health Services |
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Delayed intervention | Other | Delayed wait-list control group. The second arm involved three additional sites receiving the PMSS-PC intervention 6 months after the first arm. Initial outcomes from the PMSS-PC Experimental Intervention arm were compared to those of this Wait-list Control arm. |
|
Average pain intensity score on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form. Scores range from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe average pain intensity. |
| From 6 to 12 months following intervention implementation |
| Pain Interference with Function | Pain interference T-score, measured on the PROMIS Pain Interference Short Form. Higher scores indicate more pain interference with function. | From 6 to 12 months following intervention implementation |
| Uptake of the PMSS-PC intervention tool | Use of the PMSS-PC decision support tool by primary care providers | From baseline to 12 months following intervention implementation |
| D011314 | Preventive Health Services |