Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adequate pain control after cesarean delivery is a major concern for both parturients and obstetrician, and it usually comprise a combination of systemic and regional techniques. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, affecting the nerves supplying the anterior abdominal wall, is a recently introduced, promising regional analgesic technique for a variety of abdominal and pelvic surgeries including cesarean delivery .
Infiltration of local anesthetic into the surgical wound (either as a single shot or using indwelling catheters) has long been used for postoperative analgesia, Both the TAP block and wound infiltration, are superior to placebo, however, it is unknown which of them provides better analgesia after cesarean delivery because of a scarcity of randomized clinical trials.
This study aimed to compare bilateral US guidedTAP block with single-shot local anesthetic wound infiltration for analgesia after cesarean delivery performed under general anesthesia. The investigators hypothesized that the TAP block would decrease postoperative cumulative opioid consumption at 24 hours.
The Anaesthesilogist is Senior staff trained on such procedure.
All mothers who scheduled for elective cesarean delivery who fulfilled inclusion criteria and volunteer are assessed by:
Postoperative pain by Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score (range, 0-10; 0, no pain; 10, worst pain) on arrival in the post-labor ward (time 0) and at 2,4,6, 8, 12,18 and 24 hours postoperatively.
The duration of block (defined as the interval between performing the block and the time of the first request for analgesia) and total pethidine consumption were recorded in the 24 hours after surgery The level of patient satisfaction was measured numerically by a Likert scale ranging from one to five, 1: "not satisfied at all," 2: "slightly satisfied," 3: "moderately satisfied," 4: "very satisfied," and 5: "highly satisfied". Any adverse effects or complications will be recorded.
Intra-operative Setting
Group A: TAB group formed of 65 patients
Group B : The Infiltration Group formed of 65 patients.
• This group will B wills provided with single-shot local anesthetic wound infiltration with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine injected subcutaneously above and below skin incision before closure of skin.
Group C : Narcotics only group formed of 20 patients • routine analgesic was taken only without any intervention
Post operative settings:
Pain is usually managed by pethidine IV based on patient complain. the analgesic dose of pethidine will be 50 mg to be repeated on demand (NRS >4) provided that the total 24 hour dosage will not exceed 150 mg . At recovery room mothers asked to report their pain based on 11 point NRS score during first 24 hour. Patient satisfaction from postoperative analgesia will be assessed at 24 hours postoperatively using a 5-point scale (1 = very unsatisfied, 2 = unsatisfied, 3 = fair, 4 = satisfied,and 5 = very satisfied) after first hour, 2nd hour,4th hour, 6th hour, 12th hour and 24th hour at wards after end of surgery.
• A time in minutes from end of surgery to first analgesia request were documented together with total analgesia consumed in the first 24 h. In addition, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting will be documented within 24 h.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | TAB group formed of 65 patients |
| |
| Group B | Group B : The Infiltration Group formed of 65 patients. • This group will B wills provided with single-shot local anesthetic wound infiltration with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine injected subcutaneously above and below skin incision before closure of skin. |
| |
| Group C | Group C : Narcotics only group formed of 20 patients • routine analgesic was taken only without any intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block 0.25% bupivacaine. | Procedure | After preparing the skin with antiseptic solution, a linear high frequency ultrasound probe will be placed abdominal wall between the iliac crest and the costal margin. A Spinal needle 22g attached with flexible tubing to a syringe filled with saline will be used to perform the block then introduced through the skin anteriorly in the plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles with its tip lying in the mid axillary line. To assist with identifying these structures, The final position of the probe will to be no further anterior than the anterior axillary line. If satisfactory views are not obtained, the TAP block will not be performed. Hydro dissection with saline (2-5 ml) will be used to separate the fascial layers. After aspiration to exclude inadvertent vascular puncture, 20 ml of the 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected . TAP block will be performed in a similar fashion on the opposite side. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative pain severity assessed by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score at 1,2,4,6, 12, and 24 hours | Assessment of pain involves asking a patient to rate her pain from 0 to 10 (11 point scale) with the understanding that 0 is equal to no pain and 10 equal to the worst possible pain after first hour, 2nd hour,4th hour, 6th hour, 12th hour and 24th hour at wards after end of surgery. | 24 hours after the procedure |
| The duration of analgesia achieved by each type of block assessed by the time of first postoperative pethidine dose required. | By asking the patients about the first time to analgesic request | 24 hours after the procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cumulative pethidine consumption at 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours, NRS at 0, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours. | By observation of first time to analgesia requested. | 24 hours after the procedure |
| the incidence of side effects and Toxicity (nausea and vomiting and pruritis). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Patients undergoing elective cesarean section under general anathesia
Exclusion Criteria:
• Patient refusal.
Not provided
Not provided
The study subjects will randomly assigned to 3 equal groups (TAP group and infiltration group and Narcotics only group) of patients undergoing elective cesarean section under general anathesia in Ain Shams Maternity hospital
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mostafa Bakry | Ain Shams University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital | Cairo | 11865 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27259092 | Result | Adesope O, Ituk U, Habib AS. Local anaesthetic wound infiltration for postcaesarean section analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;33(10):731-42. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000462. | |
| 19588413 | Result | Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Local anaesthetic wound infiltration and abdominal nerves block during caesarean section for postoperative pain relief. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD006954. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006954.pub2. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003766 | Dental Occlusion |
| D002045 | Bupivacaine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003813 | Dentistry |
| D009063 | Dental Physiological Phenomena |
| D055688 | Digestive System and Oral Physiological Phenomena |
| D000813 | Anilides |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
Observation of vital data in the first 24 hours postoperatively. |
| 24 hours after the procedure |
| Patient Satisfaction | Patient satisfaction from postoperative analgesia will be assessed at 24 hours postoperatively using a 5-point scale (1 = very unsatisfied, 2 = unsatisfied, 3 = fair, 4 = satisfied,and 5 = very satisfied) after first hour, 2nd hour,4th hour, 6th hour, 12th hour and 24th hour at wards after end of surgery. | 24 hours after the procedure |
| 24739207 | Result | Fusco P, Scimia P, Paladini G, Fiorenzi M, Petrucci E, Pozone T, Vacca F, Behr A, Micaglio M, Danelli G, Cofini V, Necozione S, Carta G, Petrini F, Marinangeli F. Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery. A systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Feb;81(2):195-204. Epub 2014 Apr 16. |
| 25899736 | Result | Elamin G, Waters PS, Hamid H, O'Keeffe HM, Waldron RM, Duggan M, Khan W, Barry MK, Khan IZ. Efficacy of a Laparoscopically Delivered Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Technique during Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Double-Blind Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Aug;221(2):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.030. Epub 2015 Mar 27. |
| 25571981 | Result | Lapmahapaisan S, Tantemsapya N, Aroonpruksakul N, Maisat W, Suraseranivongse S. Efficacy of surgical transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain relief following abdominal surgery in pediatric patients. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015 Jun;25(6):614-20. doi: 10.1111/pan.12607. Epub 2015 Jan 9. |
| 28928576 | Result | Kiran LV, Sivashanmugam T, Kumar VRH, Krishnaveni N, Parthasarathy S. Relative Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric Nerve Block versus Transverse Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia following Lower Segment Cesarean Section: A Prospective, Randomized Observer-blinded Trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):713-717. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.206855. |
| 27141108 | Result | Mankikar MG, Sardesai SP, Ghodki PS. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing caesarean section. Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Apr;60(4):253-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.179451. |
| 19681409 | Result | McDonnell NJ, Keating ML, Muchatuta NA, Pavy TJ, Paech MJ. Analgesia after caesarean delivery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 Jul;37(4):539-51. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700418. |
| 22622954 | Result | Mishriky BM, George RB, Habib AS. Transversus abdominis plane block for analgesia after Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;59(8):766-78. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9729-1. Epub 2012 May 24. |
| 25125948 | Result | Aydogmus M, Sinikoglu S, Naki M, Ocak N, Sanli N, Alagol A. Comparison of analgesic efficiency between wound site infiltration and ultra-sound-guided transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia. Hippokratia. 2014 Jan;18(1):28-31. |
| 23325940 | Result | Mudgalkar N, Bele SD, Valsangkar S, Bodhare TN, Gorre M. Utility of numerical and visual analog scales for evaluating the post-operative pain in rural patients. Indian J Anaesth. 2012 Nov;56(6):553-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.104573. |
| 23587731 | Result | Sharkey A, Finnerty O, McDonnell JG. Role of transversus abdominis plane block after caesarean delivery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;26(3):268-72. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328360fa16. |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000814 | Aniline Compounds |
| D000588 | Amines |