Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of C-reactive protein (CRP), serum procalcitonin (PCT) and soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in the initial investigation of patients hospitalized with suspected acute pyelonephritis (APN).
Acute pyelonephritis (APN) is a severe acute infection in the upper urinary tract, which quite frequently is seen in the emergency department (ED). In our study, we define APN as a urinary tract infection with extension above the bladder, implicated by systemic affection in a suspected urinary tract infection (ie, fever, chills, malaise and/or lethargy beyond normal, signs of sepsis). Most often, an infection of the bladder ascends to the kidneys, causing APN. Symptoms and clinical affection range from mild to severe, but it is always important to recognize and treat APN fast in order to prevent progression to sepsis, renal failure and ultimately death. Uncertain or delayed diagnosis will often lead to an overconsumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics, which contributes to increased development of resistant bacteria and thus threaten the treatment options of the future.
APN diagnosis is primarily made today on the basis of clinical symptoms and findings in the form of flank tenderness, fever and nausea/vomiting. Typical symptoms of cystitis (dysuria, pollakisuria, suprapubic pain, hematuria) are possible but often absent. Especially elderly can present with more generalized signs of infection with nothing clearly indicating localization to the urinary tract. A positive urine culture verifies the diagnosis, but it is only available after a minimum of 24 hours.
To support the diagnosis of an APN and assess its severity, a measure of the systemic inflammatory response is useful such as abnormal temperature, elevated leucocyte count with neutrocytosis, or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP). Some uncertainty is associated with CRP because it has a delayed response to bacterial infection and is often elevated in non-infectious inflammatory conditions. A more sensitive and specific marker is desired that can differentiate between bacterial and viral infection and reflect the severity of the APN. Serum procalcitonin (PCT) has potential as a diagnostic tool in suspected bacterial infections and can distinguish between viral and bacterial urinary infections. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (SuPAR) might have a potential as a marker for acute bacterial infections requiring antibiotic treatment. However, there are no well-conducted studies which compare simultaneously all three biomarkers diagnostic abilities for bacterial infections in general or in relation to APN.
The investigators hypothesize that serum CRP, PTC and suPAR have an impact on diagnosing, prognosis, and treatment of patients with a verified APN.
The objectives of the study are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| suspected acute pyelonephritis | All patients admitted to the emergency department with suspected acute pyelonephritis assessed by the receiving physician |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biomarkers for acute pyelonephritis | Diagnostic Test | Blood samples will be collected by a medical laboratory technologist and transferred to the local laboratory for analysis of CRP, PCT and suPAR. Laboratory staff will be blinded to participant diagnosis and outcome. CRP and PCT results will be available to the treating physician, but the suPAR result will not be available.
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Verified and non verified acute pyelonephritis (APN) | The decision of whether patients admitted with suspicion of APN actually has a final diagnosis of APN is based on a combination of all findings during admission. The verification of diagnosis requires human handling, interpretation and judgment. Therefore, in this study, an expert panel will define the reference standard for the diagnosis APN. The expert panel consists of two independent consultants from the emergency department with significant experience in emergency medicine and acute infections. They will individually determine whether or not the patient admitted suspected with APN actually had this diagnosis. The final diagnosis will be based on all available relevant information from the patient medical record including MRI of the kidneys. A standardized template will be used. Disagreement will be discussed until a consensus is reached. | 2 months after patient discharge |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intensive care unit treatment | transfer to ICU during current admission (binary outcome) | within 60 days from admission to the emergency department |
| Length of stay | days spent in hospital during current admission |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Bacteriuria | Binary outcome defined by microbiologist on urine culture analysis | urine collected within 4 hours of arrival to the emergency department |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Acutely admitted patients with suspected Acute pyelonephritis (APN) from three emergency departments (EDs) in the Region of Southern Denmark (Hospital Sønderjylland, Hospital Lillebælt, Odense University Hospital)
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Christian Backer Mogensen | Hospital of Southern Jutland | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital of Southern Jutland | Aabenraa | Denmark |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30177549 | Background | Hamie L, Daoud G, Nemer G, Nammour T, El Chediak A, Uthman IW, Kibbi AG, Eid A, Kurban M. SuPAR, an emerging biomarker in kidney and inflammatory diseases. Postgrad Med J. 2018 Sep;94(1115):517-524. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135839. Epub 2018 Sep 3. | |
| 19529989 | Background | Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Muller B. Procalcitonin and other biomarkers to improve assessment and antibiotic stewardship in infections--hope for hype? Swiss Med Wkly. 2009 Jun 13;139(23-24):318-26. doi: 10.4414/smw.2009.12584. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004194 | Disease |
| D004630 | Emergencies |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| within 60 days from current admission to the emergency department |
| The number of participants who died within 30 days | binary - 30-days mortality | within 30 days from arrival day |
| The number of participants who died within 90 days | binary - 90 days mortality | within 90 days from arrival to emergency department |
| Readmission | binary | within 30 days from day of discharge |
| In-hospital mortality | binary | within 60 days from admission to the emergency department |
| 34593497 | Derived | Skjot-Arkil H, Heltborg A, Lorentzen MH, Cartuliares MB, Hertz MA, Graumann O, Rosenvinge FS, Petersen ERB, Ostergaard C, Laursen CB, Skovsted TA, Posth S, Chen M, Mogensen CB. Improved diagnostics of infectious diseases in emergency departments: a protocol of a multifaceted multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e049606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049606. |