Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single arm, open label, multi centre phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and long term safety of lomitapide in paediatric patients with HoFH receiving stable lipid lowering therapy (LLT) (including lipoprotein apheresis (LA), when applicable) comprising of the following phases:
Lomitapide has been approved for use in adult patients with HoFH in the European Union (EU) and European Economic Area (EEA), United States of America (USA), Israel, Argentina, Canada, Colombia, and Japan. This study is designed to determine if lomitapide is effective and can be safely administered to paediatric patients with HoFH. If the efficacy and safety so far observed in adults is confirmed in paediatric patients, the potential exists to significantly lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in paediatric patients with HoFH. Furthermore, the lower LDL-C levels may reduce atherosclerosis progression and would be expected to benefit these paediatric patients with HoFH.
A single arm, non comparator design has been selected due to the rarity of the disease and because the evaluation of safety variables such as growth and sexual maturation requires longer term observation than would be feasible in the context of a placebo controlled study.
To mitigate the disadvantages of a single arm design, the study includes a Run in Period of at least 6 weeks during which current lipid lowering therapy (LLT) (including lipoprotein apheresis (LA), when applicable) will be stabilised to establish baseline levels allowing each patient to serve as his/her own control. Patients will also remain on stable LLT (including LA, when applicable) during the Efficacy Phase of the study through Week 24±3 days.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age 5-10 years | Other | Lomitapide dosing commenced with 2mg at week 1 for 8 Weeks,then increased to 5mg at Week 8±3 days, 10 mg at Week 12±3 days to the maximum allowable dose of 20 mg by Week 16±3 days or the MTD by Week 20±3 days based upon acceptable safety and tolerability criteria in addition to LDL C values. |
|
| Age 11-15 years | Other | Lomitapide dosing commenced with 2mg at week 1 for 4 Weeks, then increased to 5mg at Week 4±3 days, 10 mg at Week 8±3 days, 20mg at Week 12±3 days to the maximum allowable dose of 40mg by Week 16±3 days or the MTD by Week 20±3 days based upon acceptable safety and tolerability criteria in addition to LDL C values. |
|
| Age 16 to ≤17 years | Other | Lomitapide dosing commenced with 5mg at week 1 for 4 Weeks, then increased to 10mg at Week 4±3 days, 20 mg at Week 8±3 days, 40mg at Week 12±3 days to the maximum allowable dose of 60mg by Week 16±3 days or the MTD by Week 20±3 days based upon acceptable safety and tolerability criteria in addition to LDL C values. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lomitapide | Drug | 2mg,5mg, 10mg and 20mg capsules |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy Endpoint: Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL C) at Week 24 Compared to Baseline | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL C) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Efficacy Endpoint: Percent Change From Baseline at Week 24 for Various Lipid Parameters | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change of the following lipid parameters at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD):
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change of Body Mass Index (BMI) | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change of BMI | Baseline through Week 104 |
| Lipid Accumulation in the Liver Over Time Measured by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) at Baseline and at Week 24, Week 56 and at Week 104 |
Inclusion criteria
Male and female patients aged 5 to ≤17 years with HoFH as defined by any of the following criteria recommended by the Consensus Panel on Familial Hypercholesterolaemia of the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) (Cuchel, Bruckert et al. 2014):
Baseline LDL C on LLT (maximum concentration [Cmax] immediately prior to LA, if applicable)
Body weight ≥15 kg or body mass index (BMI) and height both >10th percentile according to World Health Organization (WHO) Growth Charts for Boys and Girls 5 to 19 Years of Age
Patient and/or his/her legal representative has/have been informed, has/have read and understood the patient information/informed consent form, and has/have given written informed assent/consent
Patient and/or his/her legal representative must be able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions, particularly that
Postmenarchal female adolescents must be willing to use an effective form of birth control with failure rates <1% per year (e.g., implant, injectable, combined oral contraceptive, intrauterine contraceptive device, sexual abstinence, vasectomy or vasectomised partner) during participation in the study (and at least 4 weeks thereafter). Patients taking oestrogen based oral contraceptives should be advised about possible loss of effectiveness due to diarrhea and/or vomiting. Additional contraceptive measures should be used for 7 days after resolution of symptoms.
Patient must be in stable physical and mental health at screening
Exclusion criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universtiats-Kinderlinik Heidelberg | Heidelberg | Baden-Wurttemberg | 69120 | Germany | ||
| University Hospital of Cologne |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39426393 | Derived | Masana L, Zambon A, Schmitt CP, Taylan C, Driemeyer J, Cohen H, Buonuomo PS, Alashwal A, Al-Dubayee M, Kholaif N, Diaz-Diaz JL, Maatouk F, Martinez-Hervas S, Mangal B, Lowe S, Cunningham T. Lomitapide for the treatment of paediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (APH-19): results from the efficacy phase of an open-label, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024 Dec;12(12):880-889. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00233-X. Epub 2024 Oct 16. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects underwent assessments to determine eligibility at the Initial Screening Visit (up to 12 weeks prior to Day 0). A total of 46 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of these, 3 subjects were 'Run in' failures and did not complete the Run in Period.). Therefore, a total of 43 (93.5%) subjects entered the Efficacy Phase at Visit 4.
Male and female subjects aged 5 to ≤17 years with HoFH were enrolled in the trial at 12 study centres in various countries (3 in Germany, 1 in Israel, 2 in Italy, 2 in Saudi Arabia, 3 in Spain and 1 in Tunisia).
The first patient first visit was 14 Dec 2020 and the last patient last visit was 06 Jun 2024.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Age 5-10 Years | Lomitapide dosing commenced with 2mg at week 1 for 8 Weeks, then increased to 5mg Week 8±3 days, 10 mg at Week 12±3 days to the maximum allowable dose of 20mg by Week 16±3 days or the MTD by Week 20±3 days based upon acceptable safety and tolerability criteria in addition to LDL C values. Lomitapide: 2mg, 5mg, 10mg and 20mg capsules |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-run in |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Feb 9, 2023 | Jan 7, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline through Week 24 |
| Efficacy Endpoint: Percent Change From Baseline at Week 24 for Lp(a) | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in Lp(a) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 24 |
| Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for LDL-C | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in LDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 104 |
| Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for Non-HDL-C | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in Non-HDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 104 |
| Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for TC | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in TC at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 104 |
| Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for VLDL-C | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in VLDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 104 |
| Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for Apo B | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in apo B at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 104 |
| Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for TG | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in TG at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 104 |
| Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in Lp(a) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 104 |
| Percent Change in TC/HDL-C Ratio From Baseline at All Other Time Points to Week 104 | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in TC/HDL-C ratio at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 104 |
| Percent Change in HDL-C From Baseline at All Other Time Points to Week 104 | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in HDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Baseline through Week 104 week |
| Change in LLT From Week 28 Through Week 104 | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the change in background lipid lowering therapy | Week 28 through Week 104 |
| Change in LA From Week 28 Through Week 104 | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the change in lipoprotein apheresis | Week 28 through Week 104 |
| Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Recommended Target (2013) of LDL-C at Any Timepoint Between Baseline and Week 24 | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the number and percentage of patients achieving EAS recommended target (2013) of LDL-C | Baseline through Week 24 |
| Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving EAS Recommended Target (2013) of LDL-C at Any Time in the Study | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the number and percentage of patients achieving EAS recommended target (2013) of LDL-C | Baseline through Week 104 |
To evaluate the safety of lomitapide, as defined by lipid accumulation in the liver as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) |
| Baseline through Week 104 |
| Lipid Accumulation in the Liver Over Time Measured by Ultrasound at Baseline and at Week 24, Week 56 and at Week 104 | To evaluate the safety of lomitapide, as defined by lipid accumulation in the liver as measured by ultrasound | Baseline through Week 104 |
| Cologne |
| 50937 |
| Germany |
| University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf | Hamburg | 20246 | Germany |
| Chaim Sheba Medical Center | Ramat Gan | 52621 | Israel |
| U.O.C. Clinica Medica 1 | Padova | Padua | 35128 | Italy |
| Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, | Roma | 00165 | Italy |
| King Abdullah International Medical Research Centre (KAIMRC), | Riyadh | Saudi Arabia |
| King Faisal Specialist Hospital | Riyadh | Saudi Arabia |
| Hospital Universitari Sant Joan | Reus | Tarragona, | 43204 | Spain |
| Hospital Abente y Lago | A Coruña | 15006 | Spain |
| Hospital Clinico Universitario of Valencia | Valencia | 46010 | Spain |
| E.P.S. Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital | Monastir | 5000 | Tunisia |
| FG001 |
| Age 11-17 Years |
11-15 years: Lomitapide dosing commenced with 2mg at week 1 for 4 Weeks, then increased to 5mg Week 4±3 days, 10mg at Week 8±3 days, 20mg at week 12±3 days to the maximum allowable dose of 40mg by Week 16±3 days or the MTD by Week 20±3 days based upon acceptable safety and tolerability criteria in addition to LDL C values. 16-17 years: Lomitapide dosing commenced with 5mg at week 1 for 4 Weeks, then increased to 10mg Week 4±3 days, 20 mg at Week 8±3 days,40mg at week 12±3 days to the maximum allowable dose of 60mg by Week 16±3 days or the MTD by Week 20±3 days based upon acceptable safety and tolerability criteria in addition to LDL C values. Lomitapide: 2mg, 5mg, 10mg and 20mg capsules |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| Stratified Enrolment & run-in |
|
|
| Open Label Efficacy Phase |
|
|
| Open Label Safety Phase |
|
|
Baseline data shown are for participants who completed the baseline visit.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Age 5-10 Years | Lomitapide dosing commenced with 2mg at week 1 for 8 Weeks, then increased to 5mg Week 8±3 days, 10mg at Week 12±3 days to the maximum allowable dose of 20mg by Week 16±3 days or the MTD by Week 20±3 days based upon acceptable safety and tolerability criteria in addition to LDL C values. Lomitapide: 2mg, 5mg, 10mg and 20mg capsules |
| BG001 | Age 11-17 Years | 11-15 years: Lomitapide dosing commenced with 2mg at week 1 for 4 Weeks, then increased to 5mg Week 4±3 days, 10mg at Week 8±3 days, 20mg at week 12±3 days to the maximum allowable dose of 40mg by Week 16±3 days or the MTD by Week 20±3 days based upon acceptable safety and tolerability criteria in addition to LDL C values. 16-17 years: Lomitapide dosing commenced with 5mg at week 1 for 4 Weeks, then increase to 10mg Week 4±3 days, 20 mg at Week 8±3 days, 40mgs at week 12±3 days to the maximum allowable dose of 60mg by Week 16±3 days or the MTD by Week 20±3 days based upon acceptable safety and tolerability criteria in addition to LDL C values. Lomitapide: 2mg, 5mg, 10mg and 20mg capsules |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Body mass index | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m2 |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Efficacy Endpoint: Percent Change in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL C) at Week 24 Compared to Baseline | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL C) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 24 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Efficacy Endpoint: Percent Change From Baseline at Week 24 for Various Lipid Parameters | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change of the following lipid parameters at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD):
| Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Efficacy Endpoint: Percent Change From Baseline at Week 24 for Lp(a) | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in Lp(a) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. Note: Lp(a) assessment was inadvertently removed from the central laboratory lipid panel during the laboratory set up phase. However, Lp(a) has also been assessed locally, but in various units (mg/dL, g/L, and nmol/L). Sicne Lp(a) concentrations should not be converted from 'nmol/L' to 'mg/dL', or vice versa, and more subjects had values reported in nmol/L, results are presented for the nmol/l only. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for LDL-C | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in LDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 104 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for Non-HDL-C | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in Non-HDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 104 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for TC | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in TC at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 104 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for VLDL-C | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in VLDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 104 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for Apo B | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in apo B at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 104 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for TG | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in TG at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients from all age groups have been evaluated together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 104 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline at All Other Time Points Through Week 104 for Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in Lp(a) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. Note: Lp(a) assessment was inadvertently removed from the central laboratory lipid panel during the laboratory set up phase. However, Lp(a) has also been assessed locally, but in various units (mg/dL, g/L, and nmol/L). Sicne Lp(a) concentrations should not be converted from 'nmol/L' to 'mg/dL', or vice versa, and more subjects had values reported in nmol/L, results are presented for the nmol/l only. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 104 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change in TC/HDL-C Ratio From Baseline at All Other Time Points to Week 104 | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in TC/HDL-C ratio at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 104 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change in HDL-C From Baseline at All Other Time Points to Week 104 | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change in HDL-C at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 104 week |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in LLT From Week 28 Through Week 104 | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the change in background lipid lowering therapy | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. Number of subjects treated with LLT at Week 24:
| Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 28 through Week 104 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in LA From Week 28 Through Week 104 | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the change in lipoprotein apheresis | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. Number of subjects treated with LLT (including LA) at Week 24:
| Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 28 through Week 104 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Recommended Target (2013) of LDL-C at Any Timepoint Between Baseline and Week 24 | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the number and percentage of patients achieving EAS recommended target (2013) of LDL-C | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline through Week 24 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number and Percentage of Patients Achieving EAS Recommended Target (2013) of LDL-C at Any Time in the Study | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the number and percentage of patients achieving EAS recommended target (2013) of LDL-C | Patients have been evaluated both, as individual age groups and all together. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline through Week 104 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Percent Change of Body Mass Index (BMI) | To evaluate the efficacy of lomitapide, as defined by the percent change of BMI | Patients from all age groups have been evaluated together. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent change from Baseline | Baseline through Week 104 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Lipid Accumulation in the Liver Over Time Measured by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) at Baseline and at Week 24, Week 56 and at Week 104 | To evaluate the safety of lomitapide, as defined by lipid accumulation in the liver as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) | All subjects were to undergo NMR imaging unless it was contraindicated or not feasible (e.g., due to the need for sedation or general anaesthesia in very young or anxious subjects). In this case, ultrasound scans were to be used at the discretion of the Investigator. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline through Week 104 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Lipid Accumulation in the Liver Over Time Measured by Ultrasound at Baseline and at Week 24, Week 56 and at Week 104 | To evaluate the safety of lomitapide, as defined by lipid accumulation in the liver as measured by ultrasound | All subjects were to undergo NMR imaging unless it was contraindicated or not feasible (e.g., due to the need for sedation or general anaesthesia in very young or anxious subjects). In this case, ultrasound scans were to be used at the discretion of the Investigator. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline through Week 104 |
|
AEs were monitored throughout the study from the time of informed consent through Week 108.
Safety variables included evaluations of AEs, laboratory test results (including assessment of bone health), vital signs, ECGs, pulmonary function tests, and imaging of the liver. In addition, available standard of care echocardiography results were reviewed.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Age 5-10 Years | Patients aged 5-10 years. | 1 | 20 | 4 | 20 | 19 | 20 |
| EG001 | Age 11-17 Years | Patients aged 11-17 years. | 1 | 23 | 7 | 23 | 23 | 23 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transaminases increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arteriovenous fistula thrombosis | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Shunt occlusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subdural haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic arteriosclerosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic valve disease mixed | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular device occlusion | General disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tendon disorder | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular device infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| C-reactive protein increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| ECG signs of ventricular hypertrophy | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transaminases increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Xanthoma | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vitamin D deficiency | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abnormal loss of weight | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Odynophagia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood thyroid stimulating hormone increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemoglobin decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vitamin E increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic bruit | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bilirubin conjugated increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood calcium decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood lactate dehydrogenase | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lipoprotein (a) increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count increased | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ultrasound liver abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis streptococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngotonsillitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tonsillitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tooth infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular device occlusion | General disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | General disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngeal erythema | General disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinorrhoea | General disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypophagia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypochromic anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Carotid arteriosclerosis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Presyncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrioventricular block first degree | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thermal burn | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arcus lipoides | Eye disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vasculitis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic steatosis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatomegaly | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrocalcinosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (27.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Lp(a) analysis was analysed locally as central analysis was only available from January 2022.
The investigators may use the study data only after prior written consent of Amryt Pharmaceuticals DAC. Amryt will review the proposed publication/disclosure prior to submission for publication, presenting, using for instructional purposes or otherwise disclosing the study results. If Amryt supposes the publication/disclosure to risk its ability to patent any invention related to the study, the publication/disclosure will be modified or delayed to allow Amryt to file a patent application.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head of Clinical Operations | Amryt Pharmaceuticals DAC | +35315180200 | janet.boylan@amrytpharma.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan: Main Document | Jun 28, 2024 | Jan 7, 2025 | SAP_001.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan: Table, Figure and Listing Shells | Jun 28, 2024 | Jan 7, 2025 | SAP_002.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000090542 | Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006938 | Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II |
| D008052 | Lipid Metabolism, Inborn Errors |
| D008661 | Metabolism, Inborn Errors |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D006951 | Hyperlipoproteinemias |
| D006949 | Hyperlipidemias |
| D050171 | Dyslipidemias |
| D052439 | Lipid Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C473731 | BMS201038 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Protocol Violation |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Italy |
|
| Israel |
|
| Tunisia |
|
| Germany |
|
| Spain |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| Week 4 |
|
| ||||
| Week 8 |
|
| ||||
| Week 12 |
|
| ||||
| Week 16 |
|
| ||||
| Week 20 |
|
| ||||
| Week 24 |
|
| ||||
| Week 28 |
|
| ||||
| Week 32 |
|
| ||||
| Week 36 |
|
| ||||
| Week 40 |
|
| ||||
| Week 44 |
|
| ||||
| Week 48 |
|
| ||||
| Week 52 |
|
| ||||
| Week 56 |
|
| ||||
| Week 68 |
|
| ||||
| Week 80 |
|
| ||||
| Week 92 |
|
| ||||
| Week 104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|