Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| U1111-1246-7522 | Registry Identifier | ICTRP | |
| 2020-003117-35 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Primary Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab as assessed by the reduction at Week 24 in sinus opacification on computerized tomography (CT) scan in the dupilumab group only
Secondary Objectives:
The duration of study for each participant will include 2-4 weeks of screening period, 24-52 weeks randomized investigational medicinal product (IMP) intervention period and 12 weeks of follow-up period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part A and B: Dupilumab | Experimental | Participants received dupilumab 300 milligrams (mg) via SC injection q2w for up to 53.1 weeks. |
|
| Part A and B: Matching placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received matching placebo via SC injection q2w for up to 53.2 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dupilumab SAR231893 | Drug | Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Using the Lund Mackay (LMK) Score in Dupilumab Group | The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication. | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score | The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Participant must be at least 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
Participants must have bilateral inflammation of paranasal sinuses in CT scan with LMK ≥8 and bilateral ethmoid opacification before randomization.
Participants must have ongoing symptoms of loss of smell and rhinorrhea (anterior/posterior) of any severity, with or without facial pain/pressure for at least 12 consecutive weeks by Visit 1.
Participants must have ongoing symptoms of nasal congestion (NC)/obstruction at least 12 consecutive weeks before Visit 1 and a NC score of ≥ 2 at Visit 1 (day score) and Visit 2 (weekly average score).
Participants must have sTSS (NC, rhinorrhea, facial pain/pressure) ≥5 at Visit 1 (day score) and Visit 2 (weekly average score).
Participants must have one of the 2 following features:
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants with nasal conditions/concomitant nasal diseases such as nasal polyposis in endoscopy at Visit 1 or with history of nasal polyposis etc., making them non-evaluable at Visit 1 or for the primary efficacy
Nasal cavity malignant tumor and benign tumors.
Forced expiratory volume (FEV1) ≤50% of predicted normal at Visit 1.
Radiologic suspicion or confirmed invasive or expansive fungal rhinosinusitis.
Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the investigator's judgment, would adversely affect participation in the study
Active tuberculosis or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection, or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis unless documented adequately treated.
Diagnosed active endoparasitic infections; suspected or high risk of endoparasitic infection
Known or suspected immunodeficiency
History of malignancy within 5 years before Visit 1, except completely treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix, and completely treated and resolved nonmetastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the Screening Visit 1 or during the screening period.
History of systemic hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis to dupilumab or any of its excipients.
Participants in prior dupilumab clinical trial or have been treated with commercially available dupilumab within 12 months or who discontinued dupilumab use due to adverse event.
Participants who are treated with intranasal corticosteroid drops; intranasal steroid emitting devices/stents; nasal spray using exhalation delivery system, such as Xhance™, during screening period.
Participants on unstable dose of intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) spray 4 weeks prior to Screening Visit (Visit1) and during screening period.
Participants who have undergone sinus intranasal surgery (including polypectomy) within 6 months prior to Visit 1.
Participants who have taken:
Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1
Leukotriene antagonists/modifiers unless participant is on a continuous treatment for at least 30 days prior to Visit 1.
Initiation of allergen immunotherapy within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or a plan to begin therapy or change its dose during the screening or treatment period.
Participants received SCS during screening period (between Visit 1 and Visit 2).
Either intravenous immunoglobulin therapy and/or plasmapheresis within 30 days prior to Screening Visit (Visit 1).
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Sciences & Operations | Sanofi | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sacramento Ear, Nose & Throat Site Number : 8400010 | Roseville | California | 95661 | United States | ||
| Bensch Clinical Research LLC Site Number : 8400015 |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| EFC16723 Plain language Results Summary | View source |
Not provided
Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 71 participants were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive dupilumab or matching placebo. Randomization was stratified by screening blood eosinophil count (≥300 cells per cubic millimeter [/mm^3] or <300 cells/mm^3), background intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) use (yes or no), and region.
The study was conducted at 57 centers in 13 countries. A total of 269 participants were screened between 02 December 2020 to 26 April 2023, of which 198 participants were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to not meeting the eligibility criteria.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received matching placebo via subcutaneous (SC) injection every 2 weeks (q2w) for up to 53.2 weeks. |
| FG001 | Dupilumab 300 mg q2w | Participants received dupilumab 300 milligrams (mg) via SC injection q2w for up to 53.1 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Feb 23, 2023 | Nov 12, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous |
|
| Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Sinus Total Symptom Score (sTSS) | The sTSS is a composite score derived from the following individual items: nasal congestion (NC), anterior/posterior rhinorrhea, and facial pain/pressure. Each of the individual items were scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). The total score ranges from 0 to 9 and consists of the sum of NC, the averaged rhinorrhea item scores, and facial pain/pressure scores. Higher scores on sTSS indicated greater overall symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication. | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious AEs (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs were AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. | From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to the last dose of study drug administration (373 days) + 98 days, up to 471 days |
| Serum Concentration of Dupilumab Over Time | Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to evaluate serum concentration of dupilumab. | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24 and 52 |
| Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibody (ADA) Response to Dupilumab and Positive Neutralizing Antibody (Nab) | Plasma samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to dupilumab. Pre-existing immunoreactivity was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay at baseline with all post first dose ADA results negative, OR an ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than 4-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment-emergent ADA responses were defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results were negative or missing. Treatment-boosted response was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay post first dose that was greater-than or equal to 4-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results were positive. Samples positive in the ADA assay were further characterized for the presence of NAbs. | Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52 |
| Stockton |
| California |
| 95207 |
| United States |
| Colorado Allergy and Asthma Centers, PC Site Number : 8400003 | Denver | Colorado | 80230 | United States |
| University of Missouri Health System Site Number : 8400016 | Columbia | Missouri | 65212 | United States |
| Nebraska Medical Research Institute Site Number : 8400007 | Papillion | Nebraska | 68046 | United States |
| Optimed Research, LTD Site Number : 8400017 | Columbus | Ohio | 43235 | United States |
| Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute, P.C. Site Number : 8400004 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74136 | United States |
| Essential Medical Research, LLC Site Number : 8400014 | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74137 | United States |
| Pharmaceutical Research & Consulting, Inc. Site Number : 8400006 | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| Alamo ENT Associates Site Number : 8400021 | San Antonio | Texas | 78258 | United States |
| Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS) Medical Group - Otola Site Number : 8400009 | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| Investigational Site Number : 0320002 | Buenos Aires | C1121ABE | Argentina |
| Investigational Site Number : 0320003 | Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires | C1414AIF | Argentina |
| Investigational Site Number : 0320001 | Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires | C1425BEN | Argentina |
| Investigational Site Number : 0560002 | Ghent | 9000 | Belgium |
| Investigational Site Number : 0560001 | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
| Investigational Site Number : 1240013 | Vancouver | British Columbia | V6Z 1Y6 | Canada |
| Investigational Site Number : 1240010 | Hamilton | Ontario | L8L 2X2 | Canada |
| Investigational Site Number : 1240007 | Kingston | Ontario | K7L 2V7 | Canada |
| Investigational Site Number : 1240016 | London | Ontario | N6A 4V2 | Canada |
| Investigational Site Number : 1240001 | Montreal | Quebec | H2X 3E4 | Canada |
| Investigational Site Number : 1240012 | Montreal | Quebec | H4A 3J1 | Canada |
| Investigational Site Number : 1240002 | Trois-Rivières | Quebec | G8T 7A1 | Canada |
| Investigational Site Number : 1240005 | Québec | G1V 4G5 | Canada |
| Investigational Site Number : 1240003 | Québec | G1V 4W2 | Canada |
| Investigational Site Number : 1520001 | Santiago | Reg Metropolitana de Santiago | 8207257 | Chile |
| Investigational Site Number : 1560001 | Beijing | 100730 | China |
| Investigational Site Number : 1560005 | Changchun | 130021 | China |
| Investigational Site Number : 1560013 | Changsha | 410013 | China |
| Investigational Site Number : 1560010 | Chongqing | 400016 | China |
| Investigational Site Number : 1560006 | Shanghai | 200065 | China |
| Investigational Site Number : 1560008 | Yantai | 264000 | China |
| Investigational Site Number : 3480004 | Budapest | 1115 | Hungary |
| Investigational Site Number : 3480001 | Pécs | 7621 | Hungary |
| Investigational Site Number : 6200002 | Aveiro | 3810-501 | Portugal |
| Investigational Site Number : 6200001 | Guimarães | 4810-061 | Portugal |
| Investigational Site Number : 6200003 | Matosinhos Municipality | 4464-513 | Portugal |
| Investigational Site Number : 6430005 | Moscow | 121359 | Russia |
| Investigational Site Number : 6430002 | Saint Petersburg | 197022 | Russia |
| Investigational Site Number : 6430003 | Saint Petersburg | 197022 | Russia |
| Investigational Site Number : 6430001 | Stavropol | 355020 | Russia |
| Investigational Site Number : 4100003 | Seoul | Seoul-teukbyeolsi | 07061 | South Korea |
| Investigational Site Number : 4100002 | Seoul | Seoul-teukbyeolsi | 135-710 | South Korea |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240002 | Seville | Andalusia | 41009 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240001 | Barcelona | Barcelona [Barcelona] | 08036 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240007 | Santander | Cantabria | 39008 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240004 | Jerez de la Frontera | Cádiz | 11407 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240009 | Madrid | Madrid, Comunidad de | 28027 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240005 | Madrid / Madrid | Madrid, Comunidad de | 28040 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240008 | Pamplona | Navarre | 31008 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7240010 | Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
| Investigational Site Number : 7520001 | Stockholm | 171 76 | Sweden |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040005 | Dnipro | 49006 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040001 | Ivano-Frankivsk | 76018 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040004 | Kharkiv | 61166 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040008 | Kyiv | 01033 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040002 | Kyiv | 03680 | Ukraine |
| Investigational Site Number : 8040007 | Kyiv | 04050 | Ukraine |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Randomized population included all participants with a treatment kit number allocated and recorded in the interactive response technology (IRT) database, and regardless of whether the treatment kit was used or not.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received matching placebo via SC injection q2w for up to 53.2 weeks. |
| BG001 | Dupilumab 300 mg q2w | Participants received dupilumab 300 mg via SC injection q2w for up to 53.1 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Lund-Mackay (LMK) Score | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by Computed Tomography (CT) Scan Using the Lund Mackay (LMK) Score in Dupilumab Group | The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication. | Intent-to-treat (ITT) population with screening blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/mm^3 included all randomized participants with screening blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/mm^3 analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization regardless if treatment kit was used or not. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Opacification of Sinuses Assessed by CT Scan Using the LMK Score | The CT scan LMK staging system represented the most widely established method of sinus CT scoring. The LMK total score is based on assessment of the CT scan findings for each sinus area (maxillary, anterior ethmoid, posterior ethmoid, sphenoid, and frontal sinus on each side). The extent of mucosal opacification is rated on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = normal to 2 = total opacification. In addition, the ostiomeatal complex is graded as 0 = not occluded or 2 = occluded. The maximum score is therefore 12 per side; total score ranges from 0 (normal) to 24 (more opacified), corresponding to the sum of all sinuses and the ostiomeatal unit. Higher score indicated worse outcome. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication. | ITT population with screening blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/mm^3 included all randomized participants with screening blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/mm^3 analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization regardless if treatment kit was used or not. Only those participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Sinus Total Symptom Score (sTSS) | The sTSS is a composite score derived from the following individual items: nasal congestion (NC), anterior/posterior rhinorrhea, and facial pain/pressure. Each of the individual items were scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). The total score ranges from 0 to 9 and consists of the sum of NC, the averaged rhinorrhea item scores, and facial pain/pressure scores. Higher scores on sTSS indicated greater overall symptom severity. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study medication. | ITT population with screening blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/mm^3 included all randomized participants with screening blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells/mm^3 analyzed according to the treatment group allocated by randomization regardless if treatment kit was used or not. Only those participants with data collected at Week 24 are reported. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-Emergent Serious AEs (TESAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. TEAEs were AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the treatment-emergent period. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event. | Safety population included all participants randomly assigned to study intervention and who took at least 1 dose of study intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to the last dose of study drug administration (373 days) + 98 days, up to 471 days |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Serum Concentration of Dupilumab Over Time | Blood samples were collected at the specified timepoints to evaluate serum concentration of dupilumab. | Pharmacokinetic (PK) population included all participants in the safety population with at least 1 non-missing result for functional dupilumab concentration in serum after the first dose of the study intervention. Only those participants with data collected at specified timepoints are reported. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Nanograms per milliliter | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12, 24 and 52 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Antidrug Antibody (ADA) Response to Dupilumab and Positive Neutralizing Antibody (Nab) | Plasma samples were collected to evaluate antibodies to dupilumab. Pre-existing immunoreactivity was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay at baseline with all post first dose ADA results negative, OR an ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than 4-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment-emergent ADA responses were defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose, when baseline results were negative or missing. Treatment-boosted response was defined as an ADA positive response in the assay post first dose that was greater-than or equal to 4-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results were positive. Samples positive in the ADA assay were further characterized for the presence of NAbs. | ADA population included all participants in the safety population who had at least 1 non-missing result in the ADA assay after the first dose of the study intervention. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline (Day 1) and up to Week 52 |
|
TEAEs and TESAEs were collected from the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to the last dose of study drug administration (373 days) + 98 days, up to 471 days. All-cause mortality (deaths) were collected from participant's screening (Day -28) to the end of follow-up for each participant, up to 476 days.
Analysis was performed on safety population.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received matching placebo via SC injection q2w for up to 53.2 weeks. | 0 | 33 | 6 | 33 | 12 | 33 |
| EG001 | Dupilumab 300 mg q2w | Participants received dupilumab 300 mg via SC injection q2w for up to 53.1 weeks. | 0 | 38 | 3 | 38 | 20 | 38 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myocardial Bridging | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biloma | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis Acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Foot Deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetic Neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Vascular disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection Site Erythema | General disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection Site Reaction | General disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection Site Swelling | General disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Covid-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Otitis Media | Infections and infestations | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Accidental Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDra 26.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The Sponsor supports publication of clinical trial results but may request that investigators temporarily delay or alter publications in order to protect proprietary information. The Sponsor may also require that the results of multicenter studies be published only in their entirety and not as individual site data.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial Transparency Team | Sanofi aventis recherche & développement | 800-633-1610 ext 6# | Contact-US@sanofi.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 26, 2024 | Nov 12, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012852 | Sinusitis |
| D010254 | Paranasal Sinus Diseases |
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D009668 | Nose Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C582203 | dupilumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
Participants received dupilumab 300 mg via SC injection q2w for up to 53.1 weeks.
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|