A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the InnAVasc Arteriovenous Graft for Hemodialysis Access in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the InnAVasc Arteriovenous Graft for Hemodialysis Access in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease
The goal of the CSP-2002 clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the InnAVasc Arteriovenous Graft (IG) for hemodialysis (HD) access in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The primary study endpoints are:
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint: The proportion of subjects with secondary patency at 6 months.
Primary Safety Endpoint: The incidence of device-related adverse events of special interest (AESIs) through 6 months.
Participants will be asked to sign an informed consent form. Once enrolled, they will be assessed to receive the study graft implant and asked to participate in periodic follow-up visits and assessments through 2 years following implant.
The InnAVasc Arteriovenous Graft (IG) is intended for use in ESRD hemodialysis (HD) patients who require HD and whose next most appropriate access is an arteriovenous graft (AVG), also including those who may require an immediate cannulation AVG.
Patients with ESRD who require HD and are suitable for an AVG for HD access will be eligible for inclusion in the study. Subjects will be implanted with an InnAVasc Arteriovenous Graft (IG) in the forearm or upper arm using standard vascular surgical techniques. The graft will be placed in a "straight" (soft "C") configuration in the upper arm, or looped configuration in the forearm (forearm loop) or upper arm (axillary loop). Placing the graft across the elbow will be prohibited. Subjects must be able to be on antiplatelet therapy per the discretion of their physician (e.g., aspirin, clopidogrel, etc.).
Inclusion Criteria:
Pre-Operative Inclusion Criteria:
Patients must meet the following criteria at screening in order to be scheduled for a procedure and potentially enrolled in the study:
Intra-Operative Inclusion Criteria:
Both vessels have been exposed and are deemed appropriate for implantation (i.e., based on the surgeon's opinion, artery is of adequate size, has adequate pulse to support AV access flow, is without significant calcification, and is safely clampable; and the vein is of adequate size, free of localized sclerosis, and is free of immediate outflow obstruction).
Pre-Operative Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will be excluded from the study at screening if they exhibit any of the following exclusion criteria:
blester@wlgore.com4806986670
mjogleka@wlgore.com9288644063
Phoenix, Arizona 85012, United States
ccarrizoza@akdhc.com602-200-8288
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607, United States
Stacy-Pratt@smh.com941-917-3616
apinto3@usf.edu813-505-4787
Jennifer.Hansen@piedmont.org706-724-2463
leslie.haysley@louisville.edu502-852-2801
GJreij@som.umaryland.edu410-706-3037
nkotturu@bwh.harvard.edu617-525-8555
taveraya@njms.rutgers.edu973-972-6262
Catherine.Marin@mountsinai.org212-241-8708
NNguyenTran@northwell.edu212-434-3420
asiemien@montefiore.org718-920-4539
dtaylor@ssclt.com704-945-3560
ellen.jones@duke.edu919-681-1878
RNORTON@wakemed.org919-350-5252
Laura.Warner@guthrie.org570-887-6070
margaret.salle@prismahealth.org864-607-3405
vdanderson@regmed.com803-395-3878
aclawson@regmed.com803-395-2897
katalin.martitschalangari@bswhealth.org214-820-1722
Mariana.Hurutado@BSWHealth.org214-818-6832
cantunes@houstonmethodist.org346-238-4552
aruiz06@uw.edu206-221-3883