Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with around 200.000 patients in Germany. Besides physical symptoms, cognitive resources degrade over the years. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an established procedure to modulate cortical excitability in motor and cognitive functions. Therefore, tDCS may improve cognitive functions in patients with MS. Patients will work on a modified version of the symbol digits modalities test in two experimental sessions. During the task, they will receive either active stimulation or sham stimulation in a crossover design. Active stimulation is divided in anodal and cathodal stimulation. Anodal stimulation should facilitate cognitive processing; cathodal stimulation, on the other hand, should hinder cognitive processing.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease characterized by a multitude of symptoms, which greatly reduce the quality of life of patients. In addition to sensory and visual sensory disorders, movement disorders, paresis, fatigue and other physical symptoms, 65-95% of patients with MS also suffer from cognitive impairments. These cognitive impairments develop in the later course of the disease and express themselves in slower processing speed, delays in learning and memory performance, and executive dysfunction. In recent years, non-pharmacological approaches aimed at improving cognitive performance in MS have increasingly come into focus, including the transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
TDCS has only been investigated in a few studies that had the aim to improve cognitive performance in MS. Further, it has only been carried out in combination with cognitive training paradigms and repeated stimulation sessions. Mattioli and colleagues (2016) could e.g. show that after 10 sessions of cognitive training with tDCS stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, there was greater improvement in symbol-digit modalities test (SDMT) in the experimental group than in the control group. Similarly, Charvet and colleagues (2018) showed that after 10 sessions of cognitive training with simultaneous tDCS stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the experimental group showed a significant improvement in the domains of attention and response variability compared to the control group. These studies therefore reflect an interaction between cognitive training and tDCS, and do not allow any conclusions to be drawn about the effect of tDCS on specific processes. It is not yet known whether tDCS alone can positively influence specific cognitive functional impairments.
Therefore, the present study wants to investigate whether acute application of tDCS can improve specific cognitive functions. An adapted version of the clinically SDMT was conducted, as this test is one of the most widely used tests to describe cognitive impairments in MS. Based on a meta-analysis by Silva and colleagues (2018), that shows which brain areas are related to the implementation of the SDMT, the parietal cortex (BA7) is stimulated bilaterally with either excitatory (anodal) or inhibitory (cathodal) tDCS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation | Experimental | Patients will be bilaterally stimulated with anodal tDCS at the parietal cortex (Brodmann Area 7). |
|
| Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation | Experimental | Patients will be bilaterally stimulated with cathodal tDCS at the parietal cortex (Brodmann Area 7). |
|
| Sham transcranial direct current stimulation for anodal group | Sham Comparator | Patients will be bilaterally stimulated with sham tDCS at the parietal cortex (Brodmann Area 7). As a consequence of the crossover design, both experimental arms receive sham stimulation. |
|
| Sham transcranial direct current stimulation for cathodal group | Sham Comparator | Patients will be bilaterally stimulated with sham tDCS at the parietal cortex (Brodmann Area 7). As a consequence of the crossover design, both experimental arms receive sham stimulation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active transcranial direct current stimulation | Device | A high-definition tDCS set-up will be used with a battery-driven stimulator (Starstim 8, Neuroelectrics). Active stimulation will be conducted with 1.5 milliampere (mA) with two electrodes using three reference electrodes for each active one for 20 minutes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reaction Times in symbol-digit modalities test. | Reaction times in milliseconds for the performance of the symbol-digit modalities test. | Assessed at two timepoints (1x during active (anodal/cathodal) tDCS intervention at Day 1 or 7 (depends on randomization), 1x during sham tDCS intervention at Day 1 or 7 (depends on randomization)) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hit Rate in symbol-digit modalities test. | Hit rate in percentage of correct responses in the symbol-digit modalities test. | Assessed at two timepoints (1x during active (anodal/cathodal) tDCS intervention at Day 1 or 7 (depends on randomization), 1x during sham tDCS intervention at Day 1 or 7 (depends on randomization)) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marcus Meinzer, Prof., PhD | Universitymedicine Greifswald | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Medicine Greifswald | Greifswald | 17489 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40574976 | Derived | Riemann S, Mittelstadt M, Glatzki M, Zilges C, Wolff C, Niemann F, Roheger M, Floel A, Grothe M, Meinzer M. Information processing speed modulation by electrical brain stimulation in multiple sclerosis: towards individually tailored protocols. Brain Commun. 2025 Jun 6;7(3):fcaf223. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaf223. eCollection 2025. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009103 | Multiple Sclerosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020278 | Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS |
| D020274 | Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D003711 | Demyelinating Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065908 | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D003295 | Convulsive Therapy |
| D013000 | Psychiatric Somatic Therapies |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomized, balanced crossover design.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants and investigators are blinded according to the sham / active stimulation.
|
|
| Sham transcranial direct current stimulation | Device | A high-definition tDCS set-up will be used with a battery-driven stimulator (Starstim 8, Neuroelectrics). Sham stimulation will have a 40 seconds ramp-up and down. No stimulation will be applied after this 40 seconds. |
|
|
| Baseline performance in symbol-digit modalities test. |
Baseline performance of paper-pencil version of the symbol-digit modalities test as a predictor for the stimulation effect. |
| Assessment at baseline (Day 0, before stimulation). |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D004597 | Electroshock |
| D011580 | Psychological Techniques |