| Primary | Investigator-Assessed Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the Primary Analysis Set (PAS) | PFS was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression (PD), as assessed by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm). | Primary Analysis Set (PAS) included all randomized participants without presence or history of brain metastases at baseline. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 32.3 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. | | OG001 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, tiragolumab, 600 mg, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab, 600 mg, given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| | | Title | Measurements |
|---|
| - OG0005.39(4.30 to 6.77)
- OG0015.59(4.53 to 7.89)
|
|
| | Group IDs | Group Description | Statistical Method | Statistical Comment | P-Value | P-Value Comment | Parameter Type | Parameter Value | Dispersion Type | Dispersion Value | Confidence Interval Sides | Confidence Interval % | CI Lower Limit | CI Upper Limit | CI Lower Limit Comment | CI Upper Limit Comment | Estimate Comment | Tested Non-Inferiority | Non-Inferiority Type | Non-Inferiority Comment | Other Analysis Description |
|---|
| | Log Rank | | 0.0348 | This study is a bridging study without formal testing, the p value here is descriptive. | Hazard Ratio (HR) | 0.65 | | | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.43 | 0.97 | | | | | Superiority | | |
|
| Primary | Overall Survival (OS) in the PAS | OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. | PAS included all randomized participants without presence or history of brain metastases at baseline. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 32.3 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. | | OG001 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, tiragolumab, 600 mg, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab, 600 mg, given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
|
| Secondary | PFS in the FAS | PFS was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. | FAS included all randomized participants whether or not the participants received the assigned study treatment. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 32.3 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. | | OG001 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | |
|
| Secondary | OS in the FAS | OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. | FAS included all randomized participants whether or not the participants received the assigned study treatment. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 32.3 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. | | OG001 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, tiragolumab, 600 mg, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab, 600 mg, given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
|
| Secondary | Investigator-Assessed Confirmed Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the PAS | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on two consecutive occasions ≥4 weeks apart as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 millimeters (mm). PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off. | PAS included all randomized participants without presence or history of brain metastases at baseline. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | Up to 32.3 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. | | OG001 |
|
| Secondary | Investigator-Assessed Confirmed ORR in the FAS | ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with either a confirmed CR or PR on two consecutive occasions ≥4 weeks apart as assessed by investigator according to RECIST v.1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters in the absence of CR. Percentages have been rounded off. | FAS included all randomized participants whether or not the participants received the assigned study treatment. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | Up to 32.3 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. | | OG001 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide |
|
| Secondary | Investigator-Assessed Duration of Response (DOR) in the PAS | DOR was defined as the time interval from the date of the first occurrence of a confirmed objective response until the first date of PD as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR was evaluated for participants who had an objective response of CR or PR. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. | PAS included all randomized participants without presence or history of brain metastases at baseline. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with objective response i.e., responders. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 32.3 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
|
| Secondary | Investigator-Assessed DOR in the FAS | DOR was defined as the time interval from the date of the first occurrence of a confirmed objective response until the first date of PD as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. DOR was evaluated for participants who had an objective response of CR or PR. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. | FAS included all randomized participants whether or not the participants received the assigned study treatment. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with objective response i.e., responders. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 32.3 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
|
| Secondary | Investigator-Assessed PFS Rates at 6 Months and 12 Months in the PAS | PFS = time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, per investigator per RECIST v1.1/ death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS rate at 6 and 12 = the percentage of participants who have not experienced PD per investigator per RECIST v1.1/ death from any cause at 6 and 12 months. PD =at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the SOD at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) method was used to estimate PFS rate. Percentages have been rounded off. Abbreviation used in Statistical Analysis section - Event Free Rate - EFR. The event free rate (for example the inv-PFS free rate of 10.24% at 12-months) used the K-M approach to estimate, which accounts for the censoring, the specific nature of time-to-event data. Naive calculation based on patient proportion will introduce bias. | PAS included all randomized participants without presence or history of brain metastases at baseline. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | Month 6, Month 12 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
|
| Secondary | Investigator-Assessed PFS Rates at 6 Months and 12 Months in the FAS | PFS was defined as time from randomization to the first occurrence of PD, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PFS rate at 6 months and 12 months defined as the percentage of participants who have not experienced PD as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause at 6 and 12 months. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters at prior timepoints (including baseline), in addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. K-M method was used to estimate PFS rate. Percentages have been rounded off. The event free rate used the K-M approach to estimate, which accounts for the censoring, the specific nature of time-to-event data. Naive calculation based on patient proportion will introduce bias. | FAS included all randomized participants whether or not the participants received the assigned study treatment. Overall number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | Month 6, Month 12 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
|
| Secondary | Overall Survival Rate at 12 Months and 24 Months in the PAS | OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. OS rate at 12 months and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience death from any cause at 12 months and 24 months. Percentages have been rounded off. | PAS included all randomized participants without presence or history of brain metastases at baseline. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | Month 12, Month 24 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. | | OG001 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide |
|
| Secondary | Overall Survival Rates at 12 Months and 24 Months in the FAS | OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. OS rate at 12 months and 24 months was defined as the percentage of participants who did not experience death from any cause at 12 months and 24 months. Percentages have been rounded off. | FAS included all randomized participants whether or not the participants received the assigned study treatment. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available at the specified timepoint. | Posted | | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | | Month 12, Month 24 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. | | OG001 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide |
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, regardless of causal attribution. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product, any new disease or exacerbation of an existing disease (a worsening in the character, frequency, or severity of a known condition), recurrence of an intermittent medical condition not present at baseline, any deterioration in a laboratory value or other clinical test that is associated with symptoms or leads to a change in study treatment or concomitant treatment or discontinuation from study drug or adverse events that are related to a protocol-mandated intervention, including those that occur prior to assignment of study treatment. | | Not Posted | Apr 2026 | | | | | Up to 66 months | | Participants | | | | |
| Secondary | Time to Confirmed Deterioration (TTCD) Assessed Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core (QLQ-C30) Score in the PAS | | | Not Posted | Apr 2026 | | | | | Up to approximately 66 months | | Participants | | | | |
| Secondary | TTCD Assessed Using EORTC QLQ-C30 Score in the FAS | | | Not Posted | Apr 2026 | | | | | Up to approximately 66 months | | Participants | | | | |
| Secondary | Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Tiragolumab | Only sparse pharmacokinetic samples were collected in this study. With the focus on only Cmax and Cmin, there are no additional PK timepoints not reported | PK-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of tiragolumab treatment and who have at least one post-baseline PK sample available. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | microgram per milliliter (μg/mL) | | Cycle 1 Day 1, 30 mins post end of infusion (EOI) (cycle length= 21 days) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, tiragolumab, 600 mg, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab, 600 mg, given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
| |
| Secondary | Minimum Plasma Concentration (Cmin) of Tiragolumab | | PK-evaluable population included all participants who received at least one dose of tiragolumab treatment and who have at least one post-baseline PK sample available. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the specified timepoints. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | μg/mL | | Pre-dose, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 (cycle length= 21 days) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, tiragolumab, 600 mg, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab, 600 mg, given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
| |
| Secondary | Cmax of Atezolizumab | | Atezolizumab PK evaluable set included all participants who received at least one dose of atezolizumab treatment and who have at least one post-baseline PK sample available. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | microgram per milliliter (μg/mL) | | Cycle 1 Day 1, 30 mins post EOI (cycle length= 21 days) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. | | OG001 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, tiragolumab, 600 mg, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab, 600 mg, given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
|
| Secondary | Cmin of Atezolizumab | | Atezolizumab PK evaluable set included all participants who received at least one dose of atezolizumab treatment and who have at least one post-baseline PK sample available. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the specified timepoints. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | μg/mL | | Pre-dose, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 (cycle length= 21 days) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Tiragolumab + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, tiragolumab, 600 mg, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab, 600 mg, given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. | | OG001 | Placebo + Atezolizumab + Carboplatin + Etoposide | Participants received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo, and carboplatin, at a dose targeting initial target AUC of 5 mg/mL/min as an IV infusion, Q3W, on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle along with etoposide, 100 mg/m^2, as an IV infusion on Days 1, 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles as induction treatment. (1 Cycle = 21 days). Participants then received maintenance treatment with atezolizumab, 1200 mg, followed by tiragolumab matching placebo given as an IV infusion, Q3W, from Day 1 of Cycle 5 until disease progression, loss of clinical benefit, unacceptable toxicity, or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression. |
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Tiragolumab | | | Not Posted | Apr 2026 | | | | | Predose on Day 1 of Cycles (each cycle=21 days) 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16 and at TD visit (up to approximately 49 months) | | Participants | | | | |