Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Difficulty in getting participants to accept participating
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a three-arm prospective double-blinded randomized comparative trial aimed at comparing results regarding knee pain improvement in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by either a sham procedure, a geniculate artery embolization procedure or a geniculate nerve ablation procedure. Experienced interventional radiologists and anesthetists at the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) and study affiliated centers will carry out all interventions. 72 consecutive subjects meeting the eligibility criteria, considered for knee replacement in the future. Patients will be randomized to receive either the embolization procedure, the nerve ablation procedure or a sham procedure. Monitoring of pain will be recorded using visual analog scales, pain medication use, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and osteoarthritis knee and hip quality of life questionnaire (OAKHQOL) questionnaires over a period of 1 year post-treatment or up to the time of surgery. Pain and recovery post surgery will be monitored as well in patients who do get the Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) before the 1 year mark.
This is a three-arm prospective double-blinded randomized comparative trial. Experienced interventional radiologists and anesthetists at the MUHC and study affiliated centers will carry out all interventions.
Patients will be informed that they will not know which procedure they will receive. A barrier will be placed to shield them from visualizing the procedure and, for both procedures and sham procedure, skin freezing, and post-procedural bandages will be applied to the groin and in the skin around the knee. The patients will be informed that the procedures can take similar time between 15 minutes and 1 hr and that timing is variable between patients. They will also be informed that pain sensation around the knee can be similar between procedures. For all procedures, a written scenario (words and manipulations of the skin) will be followed such that all patients have the impression they are getting the same thing despite some having only the sham, others the embolization, and others the denervation. At the end of all procedures, patients will be transferred to the recovery room as per routine for interventional radiology procedures. Recovery room nurses will not know which of the procedures the patient had. They will be informed to look out for possible complications from either procedure. Patients will be informed that they must remain with their legs still for 3hrs after the procedure to prevent bleeding from the possible puncture in the artery that is necessary for the embolization procedure. No procedure specific technical discussion regarding the procedure will occur during the procedures to suggest what was done, only the common scenario will be followed. All this will be done in an attempt to blind the patient as much as possible. Blinding will be lifted for once the patient has completed the study. There is a final questionnaire to be filled out by the patient and physician at which point the patient will be informed of what procedure they received.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham procedure | Sham Comparator | The patient will be placed on the procedural table as for the other arms. They will be blinded to what is occuring around them. A script detailing the procedure verbally will be followed by the interventionalists to "waste" time, but the only actual medical act that will be done is freezing of the skin around the knee (as for nerve ablation procedure) and at the groin (as for embolization procedure). Dressings will be applied at the knee and groin area. |
|
| Geniculate artery embolization | Active Comparator | The patient will be placed on the procedural table as for the other arms. They will be blinded to what is occuring around them. They will undergo a similar script than everyone one else with freezing of the skin around the knee (as for the ablation procedure) and at the groin and in this group a geniculate artery embolization will be performed via an intraarterial access and use of embolization microspheres injected into the hypervascular arteries feeding the knee joint. Dressings will be applied at the knee and groin area. |
|
| Geniculate nerve ablation | Active Comparator | The patient will be placed on the procedural table as for the other arms. They will be blinded to what is occuring around them. They will undergo a similar script than everyone one else with freezing of the skin around the knee and at the groin (as for the embolization procedure) and in this group a geniculate nerve ablation will be performed by advancing a radiofrequency ablation (RFA) needle at three locations alongside the tibia and femur where the nerves course and ablation performed. Dressings will be applied at the knee and groin area. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geniculate artery embolization | Procedure | Under fluoroscopic guidance and angiographic imaging, a microcatheter is used to select all the arteries feeding the affected knee and Embosphere (100-300um) particles are injected to obtaining pruning of the hypervascular tissues arteries. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in knee pain post geniculate artery embolization versus nerve ablation vs sham | Assessment of changes in pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS - scale 0-10 with 10 being the highest degree of pain) scores between groups having undergone embolization versus ablation versus sham procedures | 1 year |
| Changes in knee pain/functionality in geniculate artery embolization versus nerve ablation vs sham | Assessment of changes in pain and functionality score using Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores (WOMAC - scale 0-96 with 96 being the most worse pain/functionality) between groups having undergone embolization versus ablation versus sham procedures | 1 year |
| Changes in pain medication use in geniculate artery embolization versus nerve ablation vs sham | Assessment in changes in dose (mg) of anti-inflammatory pain meds used between groups having undergone embolization versus ablation versus sham procedures | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of incidence of complications in geniculate artery embolization vs geniculate nerve ablation vs sham | Assessment of difference in incidence of serious complications (Grade C-E as per Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) adverse event grading) in geniculate artery embolization vs geniculate nerve ablation vs sham groups | 1 year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who are expected to have TKA surgery within 3 months.
Patients in whom the anatomy prevents either procedure
Suspected concomitant infected knee joint or other signs of infections such as fever
Patients with uncorrectable abnormal coagulation status (INR >1.5 and plt < 50,000 without use of anticoagulation agents)
Patients who have known severe allergy to the anesthetic agent or contrast
Patients with pre-existing conditions, which, in the opinion of the investigator, interfere with the conduct of the study
Patients who are uncooperative, cannot follow instructions, or who are unlikely to comply with follow-up appointments or fill-out the post-procedural pain questionnaires
Patients with mental state that may preclude completion of the study procedure or be unable to provide informed consent
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McGill University Health Centre | Montreal | Quebec | H3A3J1 | Canada | ||
| McGill University Health Centre |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
three-arm prospective double-blinded randomized comparative trial
Not provided
Not provided
The referring surgeons, nursing staff, and the patient will all be blinded to outcome. Interventional radiologists and anesthetists performing the procedure itself cannot be blinded.
|
|
| Geniculate nerve ablation | Procedure | Under fluoroscopic guidance, a Cool-tip RFA ablation needle is advanced such that it touches the femur at the condylar convexity on each side and the tibia at the tibial plateau convexity on the medial side. The ablation is performed to obtain an approximate zone of ablation of 2cm. |
|
| Skin infiltration of local anesthetic at groin and knee | Procedure | Freezing of the skin will be performed at the groin (as prior to an arterial access for embolization procedure) and at three areas around the knee (as prior to insertion of the ablation needles for nerve ablation procedure). |
|
| Changes in VAS pain scores after TKA in geniculate artery embolization vs geniculate nerve ablation vs sham | Assessment of changes in pain (VAS - scale 0-10 with 10 being the highest degree of pain) scores post TKA between groups having undergone embolization vs geniculate ablation vs sham procedures | 3 months post-surgery |
| Changes in quality of life in geniculate artery embolization versus nerve ablation vs sham | Assessment of changes in functionality osteoarthritis knee and hip quality of life scores (OAKHQOL - scale 43 quality of life items scored from 0-10 with 10 being the worse symptoms) between groups having undergone embolization versus ablation versus sham procedures | 1 year |
| Montreal |
| Quebec |
| H4A2T9 |
| Canada |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided