Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study aims to test the hypothesis that rTMS in the form of theta burst stimulation (TBS) over the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortices can modulate mirror illusion-induced rhythm suppression while observing unilateral arm movement in stroke individuals. The investigators further hypothesize that this intervention will lead to the revision of interhemispheric asymmetry. Finally, this study will also explore the longitudinal relationship between rhythm suppression and motor recovery as indicated by motor excitability in the form of MEP. The results of this study will provide significant new information regarding neurophysiological motor relearning mechanisms which could inform the development and evaluation of innovative treatments for individuals with stroke
Stroke is the leading cause of physical disability. Facilitating the process of motor relearning would greatly accelerate the rehabilitation of motor functions and elicit positive neuroplasticity of the damaged brain area. Previous research has already explored the feasibility of motor priming techniques embedded in stroke rehabilitation programs using strategies such as non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) and mirror therapy (MT). These treatments are usually implemented along with the standardized rehabilitation, sequentially or simultaneously, and have been demonstrated to be more effective than the standardized rehabilitation programs alone.
Mirror neuron, as indicated traditionally by the decrease in the amplitude of Mu rhythm, i.e. a suppression over central electrodes of electroencephalography (EEG), reflects the "seeing" of movement after "perception". Such oscillations are based on neural substrates that are discharged during the observation and execution of a motor act, which is also associated with other human functions, such as imitation, language, etc. The core mirror neuron system (MNS) is thought to be located in the premotor and the primary sensorimotor cortices, indicating that motor learning could be enhanced during action observation and overt movement.
Preliminary research has shown that repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) can enhance the corticomotor excitability in mirror neurons during both observation of movement (by others) or imagined movement in healthy subjects; in particular, as measured by enhanced motor evoked potentials (MEP). Increases in MEP has also been induced by short-term action observation and mirror visual feedback in stroke survivors. However, it is not yet known if MNS can be activated by TMS in MT following a stroke, and the relationship between mirror neuron activation and clinical improvements in stroke remains unclear.
The investigators have already published preliminary findings in patients with hemiplegic upper extremity, rTMS, and MT. Here, the investigators propose to test the hypothesis that rTMS in the form of theta-burst stimulation (TBS) over the ipsilateral and contralateral motor cortices can modulate mirror illusion-induced rhythm suppression while observing unilateral arm movement in stroke individuals. The investigators further hypothesize that this intervention will lead to the revision of interhemispheric asymmetry. Finally, this study will also explore the longitudinal relationship between rhythm suppression and motor recovery as indicated by motor excitability in the form of MEP. The results of this study will provide significant new information regarding neurophysiological motor relearning mechanisms which could inform the development and evaluation of innovative treatments for individuals with stroke
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| iTBS over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex plus mirror therapy | Experimental | iTBS: iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients. After the iTBS therapy, participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to synchronize with the non-affected hand (illusion on the mirror). The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes. |
|
| Sham iTBS over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex plus mirror therapy | Sham Comparator | iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere, but with a sham coil (i.e., sham iTBS). After the sham stimulation, participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to synchronize with the non-affected hand (illusion on the mirror). The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes. |
|
| iTBS to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex plus sham mirror therapy | Sham Comparator | iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients. After the iTBS therapy, participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time, but with a covered mirror (e.g., sham mirror therapy). In the sham mirror therapy condition, the mirror is covered by a cloth and the participant is instructed to move both arms while looking at a cross mark on the covered mirror and imaging the analogous movements of the affected arm. The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks (same as mirror therapy) and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intermittent theta burst stimulation | Device | iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients, by using a butterfly shape coil. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) | A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index | Baseline |
| Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) | A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index | 1 day |
| Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) | A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index | 2 weeks |
| Fugl-Meyer assessment (FMA) | A stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index | 1-month after the completion of the intervention |
| Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) | A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery | Baseline (immediately before the first session) |
| Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) | A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery | 1 day |
| Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) | A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery | 2 weeks |
| Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) | A measure of upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| EEG rhythm power | Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback | Baseline (immediately before the first session) |
| EEG rhythm power | Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kenneth Nai Kuen FONG, PHD | The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth FONG | Hong Kong | 000000 | Hong Kong |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Mirror Therapy | Behavioral | Participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to synchronize with the non-affected hand (illusion on the mirror). The movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes. |
|
| Sham intermittent theta burst stimulation | Device | iTBS (20 trains of ten bursts at eight-second intervals, 600 stimuli, 200-second per session) will be delivered to the ipsilesional hemisphere in stroke patients. However, a sham coil will be used, which is not associated with any stimulation effect on the brain. |
|
| Sham mirror Therapy | Behavioral | In sham mirror therapy, the mirror will be covered. Participants will practice the movements with the non-affected hand and try moving the affected arm at the same time to move the non-affected hand. The participants cannot receive mirror visual feedback of the paretic upper extremity movement during the therapy. Same as mirror therapy, the movement practice will involve 5 table-top tasks and the participant will be instructed to perform as many trials as possible in each session with a maximum of 30 trials per task, giving a total of 150 trials per session, lasting for 20 minutes. |
|
| 1-month after the completion of the intervention |
| 1 day |
| EEG rhythm power | Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback | 2 weeks |
| EEG rhythm power | Rhythm power desynchronization/synchronization in response to mirror visual feedback | 1-month after the completion of the intervention |
| Motor-evoked Potential (MEP) | Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex. | Baseline (immediately before the first session) |
| Motor-evoked Potential (MEP) | Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex. | 1 day |
| Motor-evoked Potential (MEP) | Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex. | 2 weeks |
| Motor-evoked Potential (MEP) | Electrical potential recorded over a hand muscle, evoked by stimulating the primary motor cortex | 1-month after the completion of the intervention |
| Cortical silent period | The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex. | Baseline (immediately before the first session) |
| Cortical silent period | The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex. | 1 day |
| Cortical silent period | The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex. | 2 weeks |
| Cortical silent period | The cortical silent period (cSP) refers to an interruption of voluntary muscle activities during contraction by stimulating the contralateral primary motor cortex. | 1-month after the completion of the intervention |
| Ipsilateral silent period | Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex. | Baseline (immediately before the first session) |
| Ipsilateral silent period | Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex. | 1 day |
| Ipsilateral silent period | Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex. | 2 weeks |
| Ipsilateral silent period | Ipsilateral silent period (iSP) is an interruption of ongoing muscle activities caused by stimulating ipsilateral primary motor cortex. | 1-month after the completion of the intervention |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D006429 | Hemiplegia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D010243 | Paralysis |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000088762 | Mirror Movement Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided