Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In a current first-in-human study, called Stimulation Movement Overground (STIMO, NCT02936453), Epidural Electrical Stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord is applied to enable individuals with chronic severe spinal cord injury (SCI) to complete intensive locomotor neurorehabilitation training. In this clinical feasibility study, it was demonstrated that EES results in an immediate enhancement of walking function, and that when applied repeatedly as part of a neurorehabilitation program, EES can improve leg motor control and trigger neurological recovery in individuals with severe SCI to a certain extent (Wagner et al. 2018).
Preclinical studies showed that linking brain activity to the onset and modulation of spinal cord stimulation protocols not only improves the usability of the stimulation, but also augments neurological recovery. Indeed, rats rapidly learned to modulate their cortical activity in order to adjust the amplitude of spinal cord stimulation protocols. This brain-spine interface allowed them to increase the amplitude of the movement of their otherwise paralyzed legs to climb up a staircase (Bonizzato et al. 2018). Moreover, gait rehabilitation enabled by this brain-spine interface (BSI) augmented plasticity and neurological recovery. When EES was correlated with cortical neuron activity during training, rats showed better recovery than when training was only supported by continuous stimulation (Bonizzato et al. 2018). This concept of brain spine-interface was validated in non-human primates (Capogrosso et al. 2016).
Clinatec (Grenoble, France) has developed a fully implantable electrocorticogram (ECoG) recording device with a 64-channel epidural electrode array capable of recording electrical signals from the motor cortex for an extended period of time and with a high signal to noise ratio the electrical signals from the motor cortex. This ECoG-based system allowed tetraplegic patients to control an exoskeleton (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02550522) with up to 8 degrees of freedom for the upper limb control (Benabid et al. 2019). This device was implanted in 2 individuals so far; one of them has been using this system both at the hospital and at home for more than 3 years.
We hypothesize that ECoG-controlled EES in individuals with SCI will establish a direct bridge between the patient's motor intention and the spinal cord below the lesion, which will not only improve or restore voluntary control of leg movements, but will also boost neuroplasticity and neurological recovery when combined with neurorehabilitation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| All participants | Experimental | All participants receive the same intervention. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STIMO-BSI system implantation | Device | Participants are implanted bilaterally with epidural electrocorticography devices. The decoded motor intentions are driving the implanted spinal cord stimulation system. Brain-controlled spinal cord stimulation is used for training and rehabilitation to recover voluntary movements. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Measure | Number of Adverse Events possibly, probably or causally related to the procedure or device. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Safety Measure | Number of device deficiencies | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| WISCI II score | From 0 to 20, higher scores mean a better outcome | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| 10mWT | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jocelyne Bloch | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHUV | Lausanne | Canton of Vaud | 1011 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30382197 | Background | Wagner FB, Mignardot JB, Le Goff-Mignardot CG, Demesmaeker R, Komi S, Capogrosso M, Rowald A, Seanez I, Caban M, Pirondini E, Vat M, McCracken LA, Heimgartner R, Fodor I, Watrin A, Seguin P, Paoles E, Van Den Keybus K, Eberle G, Schurch B, Pralong E, Becce F, Prior J, Buse N, Buschman R, Neufeld E, Kuster N, Carda S, von Zitzewitz J, Delattre V, Denison T, Lambert H, Minassian K, Bloch J, Courtine G. Targeted neurotechnology restores walking in humans with spinal cord injury. Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):65-71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0649-2. Epub 2018 Oct 31. | |
| 27830790 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013119 | Spinal Cord Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013118 | Spinal Cord Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| ARC-BSI Lumbar System | Device | ARC-BSI Lumbar System for participants entering the optional extension with system upgrade: replacement of the neurostimulator, and upgrade of the WIMAGINE system and STIMO system wearable devices. |
|
| Weight bearing capacity | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| SCIM III score | From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| 6minWT | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| Time Up and Go | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| Maximum Voluntary Contraction | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| ASIA score | From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| Modified Ashworth Scale | From 0 to 4, higher scores mean a worst outcome | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| Berg Balance Scale | From 0 to 56, higher scores mean a better outcome | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| Gait Analysis | Average step height, step length, amplitude of EMG activity during walking | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| WHOQOL-BREF | From 0 to 100, higher scores mean a better outcome | 1 week before implantation, 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| BCI performance measures | Decoding accuracy from 0-100% higher numbers mean a better outome | 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| Upper Limb Neurobiomechanics | Average range of movement, amplitude of EMG activity during upper limb movements | 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| ECoG signal stability | Power density spectrum of the ECoG signal over each electrode | 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| SSEP | Amplitude and latency of the cortically evoked potentials | 8 weeks and 19 weeks after implantation |
| Background |
| Capogrosso M, Milekovic T, Borton D, Wagner F, Moraud EM, Mignardot JB, Buse N, Gandar J, Barraud Q, Xing D, Rey E, Duis S, Jianzhong Y, Ko WK, Li Q, Detemple P, Denison T, Micera S, Bezard E, Bloch J, Courtine G. A brain-spine interface alleviating gait deficits after spinal cord injury in primates. Nature. 2016 Nov 10;539(7628):284-288. doi: 10.1038/nature20118. |
| 31587955 | Background | Benabid AL, Costecalde T, Eliseyev A, Charvet G, Verney A, Karakas S, Foerster M, Lambert A, Moriniere B, Abroug N, Schaeffer MC, Moly A, Sauter-Starace F, Ratel D, Moro C, Torres-Martinez N, Langar L, Oddoux M, Polosan M, Pezzani S, Auboiroux V, Aksenova T, Mestais C, Chabardes S. An exoskeleton controlled by an epidural wireless brain-machine interface in a tetraplegic patient: a proof-of-concept demonstration. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Dec;18(12):1112-1122. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30321-7. Epub 2019 Oct 3. |
| 30068906 | Background | Bonizzato M, Pidpruzhnykova G, DiGiovanna J, Shkorbatova P, Pavlova N, Micera S, Courtine G. Brain-controlled modulation of spinal circuits improves recovery from spinal cord injury. Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 1;9(1):3015. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05282-6. |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |