Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to test a revised psychoeducational intervention to help Care Partners for family members with dementia understand and reduce the distressing behaviors that come with progressive dementia. Tele-STELLA (Support via TEchnology: Living and Learning with Advancing Alzheimer's disease and related dementias) is a multicomponent videoconference-based intervention designed to facilitate effective management of behavioral and psychological symptoms common to the later stages of dementia. In the Tele-STELLA intervention, professionals ("Guides") meet with family members ("Care Partners") who care for persons with dementia. Working together, the Care Partners and Guides identify strategies to address upsetting behaviors. The goal of this intervention is to reduce upsetting behaviors and, thus, Care Partner burden.
Providing care for a family member with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD, aka, "dementia") is both rewarding and risky. Care Partners exposed to chronic stress, often over years, are susceptible to physical and psychological ailments. Effective interventions that reduce Care Partner burden and health risks are available, but various factors impede participation, including distance, cost, behavioral symptoms of dementia, stigma and social anxiety. Recognizing the need to reduce barriers to access, scientists have turned to Internet-based interventions. Recent research indicates that multi-component, technology-facilitated interventions which allow Care Partner engagement with health professionals are effective and favored by Care Partners. However, a minority of telehealth-based interventions allow for health professional engagement and, of these, only a handful provide real-time interaction. Further, Hopwood et al. concluded that, despite the fact that family needs vary across ADRD stages, the interventions reviewed were not targeted to specific stages of dementia.
To address the needs of families living with dementia, the investigators have completed two pilot studies using Internet-based Care Partner interventions. These studies tested the feasibility and consumer acceptability of the evidence-based, STAR-C intervention, the precursor to Tele-STELLA, when delivered via telehealth. Qualitative data revealed the telehealth intervention was acceptable to Care Partners and preferred over a potential in-home intervention. The investigators found that burden was reduced, but depression was not. This may be because the interaction with the Guide formally ended after Session 8, leaving Care Partners with a sense of isolation, as this one commented: "I went through withdrawals… I wanted to call her (the Guide)-who can I turn to?" The prototype interventions did not include meaningful opportunities for Care Partners to interact with each other post-intervention. Care Partners felt their support vanished and did not like "the fact that it was over." Care Partners advised that future interventions should include both one-to-one sessions and one-to-multiple sessions.
Based on the qualitative and quantitative data from the pilot work, Tele-STELLA was designed to address the specific needs of families living with moderate to severe dementia. Tele-STELLA is a multi-component, tailored intervention that begins with one-to-one sessions with each Care Partner and Guide, then links Care Partners to each other in a meaningful way to sustain support post intervention. Tele-STELLA is designed for families living in the later stages of dementia, where behavioral symptoms are more prominent and distressing.
The ultimate goal of this study is to diminish the frequency of behavioral symptoms that persons with dementia experience, and Care Partner reactivity to these symptoms. Based on Kales et al. framework, behavioral symptoms arise from unmet needs, overburdened Care Partners and environmental factors, all within the context of cultural background and beliefs. Behavioral symptoms are bidirectional in that the person with dementia's behaviors affects the Care Partner's behaviors and vice versa. The investigators hypothesize that addressing these factors will reduce behavioral symptom frequency, and, in turn, Care Partner reactivity to them, resulting in reduced Care Partner burden, depression and grief.
Tele-STELLA allows all study activities to be done in Care Partners' homes, using videoconferencing, email and phones. This includes assessments of burden and depression using electronic versions of classic measures. No visits to university sites are needed.
The purpose of this study is to test a revised psychoeducational intervention to help Care Partners for family members with dementia understand and reduce the distressing behaviors that come with progressive dementia. Tele-STELLA (Support via TEchnology: Living and Learning with Advancing Alzheimer's disease and related dementias) is a multicomponent videoconference-based intervention designed to facilitate effective management of behavioral and psychological symptoms common to the later stages of dementia. In the Tele-STELLA intervention, professionals ("Guides") meet with family members ("Care Partners") who care for persons with dementia. Working together, the Care Partners and Guides identify strategies to address upsetting behaviors. The goal of this intervention is to reduce upsetting behaviors and, thus, Care Partner burden.
The specific aims of this study are:
Aim 1. Establish the feasibility and acceptability of Tele-STELLA
Aim 2. Establish the efficacy of Tele-STELLA in reducing the frequency of behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and Care Partner reactivity to the symptoms.
H1: Participants who completed the Tele-STELLA intervention will report a significant reduction in the frequency of BPSD and Care Partner reactivity to the BPSD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Care Partners | Other | Based on previous work, we will recruit up to 75 Care Partners and their 75 care recipients with dementia. This allows for 20% attrition. We will recruit participants from Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs) and other national locations. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tele-STELLA | Behavioral | Tele-STELLA (Support via TEchnology: Living and Learning with Advancing Alzheimer's disease and related dementias) is a multicomponent videoconference-based intervention designed to facilitate effective management of behavioral and psychological symptoms common to the later stages of dementia. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist, Reactivity Subscale | The primary outcome variable, reactivity, will be assessed with the RMBPC, which measures the frequency of care recipient behavioral symptoms and care partner reactions to these behaviors. The RMBPC was chosen because it aligns with our theoretical foundation that assumes burden is a result of care partner reactions to behavioral symptoms. The RMBPC is a 29-item caregiver report measure, 5-point Likert scale with frequency measuring from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (daily or more often) and reactivity measuring from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total score between 0-116 for each subscale (frequency subscale and reactivity subscale). Higher scores indicate greater behavioral problems. | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
| Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist, Frequency Subscale | The primary outcome variable, reactivity, will be assessed with the RMBPC, which measures the frequency of care recipient behavioral symptoms and care partner reactions to these behaviors. The RMBPC was chosen because it aligns with our theoretical foundation that assumes burden is a result of care partner reactions to behavioral symptoms. The RMBPC is a 29-item caregiver report measure, 5-point Likert scale with frequency measuring from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (daily or more often) and reactivity measuring from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total score between 0-116 for each subscale (frequency subscale and reactivity subscale). Higher scores indicate greater behavioral problems. | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Marwit Meuser Caregiver Grief Index-Short Form | Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Index-Short Form (MM-CGI) is an 18-item caregiver-report measure of pre-death grief. Items are on a 5-point Likert scale and summed for a total score ranging between 18 to 90. Higher scores on this measure indicate greater caregiver grief. | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
Not provided
Care Recipient Inclusion Criteria:
Care Recipient Exclusion Criteria:
Care Partner Inclusion Criteria:
Care Partner Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Allison Lindauer, PhD | Oregon Health and Science University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon Health and Science University, Layton Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Center | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34288013 | Background | Lindauer A, Messecar D, McKenzie G, Gibson A, Wharton W, Bianchi A, Tarter R, Tadesse R, Boardman C, Golonka O, Gothard S, Dodge HH. The Tele-STELLA protocol: Telehealth-based support for families living with later-stage Alzheimer's disease. J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):4254-4267. doi: 10.1111/jan.14980. Epub 2021 Jul 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
De-identified IPD will be available upon request to our Alzheimer's Disease Research Center
Data will be available 1/2026, available indefinitely
Requests need to made to the PI at the Oregon Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (OARDC). A short data request form will need to be submitted to the OADRC
Not provided
Care Recipients were consented and enrolled into the study to collect demographic data about them. Care Recipients did not participate in the interventions, but because the virtual interventions were videorecorded, there may have been a time where the Care Recipient inadvertently steps into view of the camera and have their likeness recorded. In the case that happens, we had their consent to be videorecorded.
Care Partners were remotely recruited from across the United States from clinics, electronic medical record systems, ADRC research cohorts, ResearchMatch and other national registries (e.g., RISE), community advisory committees, faith communities, and the community at large. We used social media (e.g., Facebook, Instagram) advertisements to recruit Care Partners from the ADRC regions.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Care Partners | Family caregivers of persons with dementia that care for their family member for more than 4 hours per week and report at least two behaviors their family member does that are extremely upsetting and occur more than once per week. |
| FG001 | Care Recipients | Family member with dementia who has a diagnosis of ADRD in the moderate to late stages as defined by the family member and exhibits two or more behaviors that the Care Partner reports as extremely upsetting and occurring more than once per week. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Care Partners | Family caregivers of persons with dementia that care for their family member for more than 4 hours per week and report at least two behaviors their family member does that are extremely upsetting and occur more than once per week. |
| BG001 | Care Recipients |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist, Reactivity Subscale | The primary outcome variable, reactivity, will be assessed with the RMBPC, which measures the frequency of care recipient behavioral symptoms and care partner reactions to these behaviors. The RMBPC was chosen because it aligns with our theoretical foundation that assumes burden is a result of care partner reactions to behavioral symptoms. The RMBPC is a 29-item caregiver report measure, 5-point Likert scale with frequency measuring from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (daily or more often) and reactivity measuring from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total score between 0-116 for each subscale (frequency subscale and reactivity subscale). Higher scores indicate greater behavioral problems. | Due to participants withdrawing during the study or not completing the surveys, analyses were conducted on different amounts of participants per time frame. Pre-Intervention (Nova), N=177; Post-Intervention (Nova), N=151; One Month Follow-Up (Nova), N=146; Pre-Intervention (Constellation), N=119; Post-Intervention (Constellation), N=106; Two Month Follow-Up, N=100. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
Care Partners and Care Recipients could be in the study for over 1 year depending on the Care Partner's availability to join the interventions. Care Partners would report on adverse events for themselves and their care recipients from the time they consented to participate through study completion. Care Recipients did not participate in the intervention, but adverse events and serious adverse events were collected.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Care Partners | Family caregivers of persons with dementia that care for their family member for more than 4 hours per week and report at least two behaviors their family member does that are extremely upsetting and occur more than once per week. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospitalization | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospice | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Allison Lindauer | Oregon Health & Science University | (503) 494-6976 | lindauer@ohsu.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 19, 2025 | Feb 25, 2026 | Prot_SAP_002.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003704 | Dementia |
| D000544 | Alzheimer Disease |
| D000084802 | Caregiver Burden |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Care partners will participate in 2, 8-week sessions to learn about distressing behavioral symptoms in dementia.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD), Care Partner | The Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD), Care Partner version includes 13 items on a 4-point Likert scale with answers ranging from 1 = poor to 4 = excellent. The total score is the sum of items with a score range between 13-52. Higher scores indicate a better perceived quality of life for the care partner. | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
| Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, 10-item (CES-D 10) | The 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D 10) is a self-report measure of depressive symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale with answers ranging from 0-3 (0 = rarely/none to 3 = most/all of the time). Items are summed after reverse scoring for the two positively worded items with a total score range of 0-30. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms. | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
| 4-item Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-4) | Zarit Burden Intervention 4-item (ZBI-4) is a 4-item caregiver-report measure of perceived burden. Items were on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always). The total score was the sum of items with a range of 0-16. Higher scores indicated greater caregiver burden. | Baseline (first weekly survey at study enrollment, prior to intervention). |
| Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) | The Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) is a 10-item Likert scale measure of the Big Five personality traits. Choices range from 1(disagree strongly) to 7 (agree strongly) with reverse scoring on items 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. Scoring included the average of the two items as follows: extraversion: 1, 6R; agreeableness: 2R, 7; conscientiousness: 3, 8R; emotional stability: 4R, 9; openness to experiences: 5, 10R. Each trait had a score range of 1-7 with higher scores indicating greater standing on each trait dimension. | Baseline (1 week prior to Constellation intervention start) |
| Computer Self-Efficacy and Computer Anxiety Survey | Investigator-developed single-item measure of computer self-efficacy: "I am confident in my ability to use computers." Care partners rated this sentence from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater perceived computer self-efficacy. | Baseline (at study enrollment) and post-Constellation (8 weeks after Constellation start) |
| Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD), Care Recipient | The Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD), Care Recipient version includes 13 items on a 4-point Likert scale with answers ranging from 1 = poor to 4 = excellent. Care partners reported on this based on how they think their care recipient would respond. The total score is the sum of items with a score range between 13-52. Higher scores indicate a better perceived quality of life for the care recipient. | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
| Overwhelmed/Too busy |
|
| Personal reasons |
|
| PwD death |
|
| PwD in hospice |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
Family member with dementia who has a diagnosis of ADRD in the moderate to late stages as defined by the family member and exhibits two or more behaviors that the Care Partner reports as extremely upsetting and occurring more than once per week. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Marwit Meuser Caregiver Grief Index-Short Form | Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Index-Short Form (MM-CGI) is an 18-item caregiver-report measure of pre-death grief. Items are on a 5-point Likert scale and summed for a total score ranging between 18 to 90. Higher scores on this measure indicate greater caregiver grief. | Due to participants withdrawing during the study or not completing the surveys, analyses were conducted on different amounts of participants per time frame. Pre-Intervention (Nova), N=177; Post-Intervention (Nova), N=151; One Month Follow-Up (Nova), N=146; Pre-Intervention (Constellation), N=119; Post-Intervention (Constellation), N=106; Two Month Follow-Up, N=100. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD), Care Partner | The Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD), Care Partner version includes 13 items on a 4-point Likert scale with answers ranging from 1 = poor to 4 = excellent. The total score is the sum of items with a score range between 13-52. Higher scores indicate a better perceived quality of life for the care partner. | Due to participants withdrawing during the study or not completing the surveys, analyses were conducted on different amounts of participants per time frame. Pre-Intervention (Nova), N=177; Post-Intervention (Nova), N=151; One Month Follow-Up (Nova), N=146; Pre-Intervention (Constellation), N=119; Post-Intervention (Constellation), N=106; Two Month Follow-Up, N=100. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, 10-item (CES-D 10) | The 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D 10) is a self-report measure of depressive symptoms on a 4-point Likert scale with answers ranging from 0-3 (0 = rarely/none to 3 = most/all of the time). Items are summed after reverse scoring for the two positively worded items with a total score range of 0-30. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms. | Due to participants withdrawing during the study or not completing the surveys, analyses were conducted on different amounts of participants per time frame. Pre-Intervention (Nova), N=177; Post-Intervention (Nova), N=151; One Month Follow-Up (Nova), N=146; Pre-Intervention (Constellation), N=119; Post-Intervention (Constellation), N=106; Two Month Follow-Up, N=100. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | 4-item Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-4) | Zarit Burden Intervention 4-item (ZBI-4) is a 4-item caregiver-report measure of perceived burden. Items were on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always). The total score was the sum of items with a range of 0-16. Higher scores indicated greater caregiver burden. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline (first weekly survey at study enrollment, prior to intervention). |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) | The Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) is a 10-item Likert scale measure of the Big Five personality traits. Choices range from 1(disagree strongly) to 7 (agree strongly) with reverse scoring on items 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. Scoring included the average of the two items as follows: extraversion: 1, 6R; agreeableness: 2R, 7; conscientiousness: 3, 8R; emotional stability: 4R, 9; openness to experiences: 5, 10R. Each trait had a score range of 1-7 with higher scores indicating greater standing on each trait dimension. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline (1 week prior to Constellation intervention start) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Computer Self-Efficacy and Computer Anxiety Survey | Investigator-developed single-item measure of computer self-efficacy: "I am confident in my ability to use computers." Care partners rated this sentence from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater perceived computer self-efficacy. | Due to participants withdrawing during the study or not completing the surveys, analyses were conducted on different amounts of participants per time frame. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline (at study enrollment) and post-Constellation (8 weeks after Constellation start) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD), Care Recipient | The Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD), Care Recipient version includes 13 items on a 4-point Likert scale with answers ranging from 1 = poor to 4 = excellent. Care partners reported on this based on how they think their care recipient would respond. The total score is the sum of items with a score range between 13-52. Higher scores indicate a better perceived quality of life for the care recipient. | Due to participants withdrawing during the study or not completing the surveys, analyses were conducted on different amounts of participants per time frame. Pre-Intervention (Nova), N=177; Post-Intervention (Nova), N=151; One Month Follow-Up (Nova), N=146; Pre-Intervention (Constellation), N=119; Post-Intervention (Constellation), N=106; Two Month Follow-Up, N=100. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
|
|
|
| Primary | Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist, Frequency Subscale | The primary outcome variable, reactivity, will be assessed with the RMBPC, which measures the frequency of care recipient behavioral symptoms and care partner reactions to these behaviors. The RMBPC was chosen because it aligns with our theoretical foundation that assumes burden is a result of care partner reactions to behavioral symptoms. The RMBPC is a 29-item caregiver report measure, 5-point Likert scale with frequency measuring from 0 (never occurred) to 4 (daily or more often) and reactivity measuring from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely) for a total score between 0-116 for each subscale (frequency subscale and reactivity subscale). Higher scores indicate greater behavioral problems. | Due to participants withdrawing during the study or not completing the surveys, analyses were conducted on different amounts of participants per time frame. Pre-Intervention (Nova), N=177; Post-Intervention (Nova), N=151; One Month Follow-Up (Nova), N=146; Pre-Intervention (Constellation), N=119; Post-Intervention (Constellation), N=106; Two Month Follow-Up, N=100. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline (1 week pre-Nova); post-Nova (8 weeks); 1-month follow-up (12 weeks). For Constellation: baseline (1 week pre-start); post (8 weeks); 2-month follow-up (16 weeks). Constellation could begin up to 12 months after Nova. |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 188 |
| 4 |
| 188 |
| 34 |
| 188 |
| EG001 | Care Recipients | Family member with dementia who has a diagnosis of ADRD in the moderate to late stages as defined by the family member and exhibits two or more behaviors that the Care Partner reports as extremely upsetting and occurring more than once per week. | 23 | 187 | 25 | 187 | 65 | 187 |
| Life Threatening | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urgent Care | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hospitalization | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urgent Care | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| COVID | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Falls | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Other | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D024801 | Tauopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D013315 | Stress, Psychological |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
|
| One Month Follow-Up (Nova) |
|
|
| Pre-Intervention (Constellation) |
|
|
| Post-Intervention (Constellation) |
|
|
| Two-Month Follow-Up (Constellation) |
|
|
| Overall |
|
|
|
| One Month Follow-Up (Nova) |
|
|
| Pre-Intervention (Constellation) |
|
|
| Post-Intervention (Constellation) |
|
|
| Two Month Follow-Up (Constellation) |
|
|
| Overall |
|
|
|
| One Month Follow-Up (Nova) |
|
|
| Pre-Intervention (Constellation) |
|
|
| Post-Intervention (Constellation) |
|
|
| Two Month Follow-Up (Constellation) |
|
|
| Overall |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Anxious, easily upset |
|
| Openness to new experiences, complex |
|
| Reserved, quiet |
|
| Sympathetic, warm |
|
| Disorganized, careless |
|
| Calm, emotionally stable |
|
| Conventional, uncreative |
|
|
| Disagree (pre-intervention) |
|
|
| Disagree (post-intervention) |
|
|
| Neutral (pre-intervention) |
|
|
| Neutral (post-intervention) |
|
|
| Agree (pre-intervention) |
|
|
| Agree (post-intervention) |
|
|
| Strongly agree (pre-intervention) |
|
|
| Strongly agree (post-intervention) |
|
|
|
| One Month Follow-Up (Nova) |
|
|
| Pre-Intervention (Constellation) |
|
|
| Post-Intervention (Constellation) |
|
|
| Two Month Follow-Up (Constellation) |
|
|
| Overall |
|
|
|
| One Month Follow-Up (Nova) |
|
|
| Pre-Intervention (Constellation) |
|
|
| Post-Intervention (Constellation) |
|
|
| Two Month Follow-Up (Constellation) |
|
|
| Overall |
|
|