Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Low enrollment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is designed to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CEDM) in predicting early neoadjuvant therapy response and pathologic complete response (pCR) compared to mammography.
Patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer with available mammography and ultrasound imaging are eligible for the study.
Eligible patients will be imaged at baseline (before initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy), early (2-4 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy) and late (after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) timepoints with mammography. CEDM will be done within 2 weeks of the specified timepoint. Additionally, a survey of subject experience with CEDM and other pre-operative imaging will be collected after CEDM is performed.
The use of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in the treatment of breast cancer patients is increasing beyond the scope of locally advanced disease. Imaging provides important information in assessing response to therapy as a complement to conventional tumor measurements via physical examination. Tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy can also provide prognostic information. The attainment of pCR after completion of neoadjuvant therapy and surgical resection is associated with improved disease-free survival. This correlation is especially strong for Triple-receptor negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) positive breast cancer. Studies of neoadjuvant therapy have used a variety of methods for assessing tumor response. Currently, there are no established clinical practice guidelines for how best to assess tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy. Typically, patients undergo conventional breast imaging such as mammography and ultrasonography (US) and physical examination, and dynamic contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging (DCR-MRI) in selected cases.
Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) is a novel imaging technique, which allows digital mammography to be used with contrast enhancement to depict cancers that would otherwise be occult on standard unenhanced mammography. CEDM is performed with and without intravenous iodine contrast, using the dual energy subtraction technique. Compared with mammography and US, CEDM improves the sensitivity for breast cancer detection without decreasing specificity. CEDM digital detector has higher spatial resolution than MRI, revealing details that are approximately 10 times better. In contrast to the rapid washout in MRI, enhancement on CEDM in fact persists for at least 10 min after contrast agent infusion. Today CEDM is available commercially for clinical use. It is estimated that over 200,000 CEDM examinations have been performed to date in both research and clinical settings. CEDM costs significantly less compared to MRI. Furthermore, longer time delays between contrast injection and CEDM exposure could result in stronger enhancement and hence better visibility compared to MRI, especially given the much higher spatial resolution of digital mammography. It is unknown whether CEDM can improve the sensitivity of mammography in the early assessment of neoadjuvant therapy response. We hypothesize that CEDM is superior to mammography and ultrasound in assessing early response, and pre-surgical residual cancer after neoadjuvant therapy, and when performed, non-inferior to MRI in assessing the residual disease using the metrics of pCR and residual cancer burden (RCB).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast cancer patients | Experimental | Patients with ipsilateral intact biopsy-proven breast cancer |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Digital Mammography | Procedure | Digital Mammography enhanced with an iodinated contrast agent |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for CEDM | Sensitivities in predicting pCR will be calculated for CEDM and measured as AUC | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
| Sensitivity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for Mammography | Sensitivities in predicting pCR will be calculated for mammography measured as AUC | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
| Specificity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for CEDM | Specificity of predicting pCR will be calculated for CEDM and measured as AUC | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
| Specificity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for Mammography | Specificity of predicting pCR will be calculated for mammography and measured as AUC | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
| Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Assessing pCR or Non Response | ROC analysis will be used to assess the diagnostic performance of CEDM. The Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) will be compared. A leave-one-out cross validation algorithm will be used to reduce bias from overfitting. | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
| Correlation of Residual Tumor Size With Pathologic Size | Spearman's rank correlation will be used to measure the association between final pathologic and imaging tumor size |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Basak Dogan, MD | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT Southwestern Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Breast Cancer Patients | Patients with ipsilateral intact biopsy-proven breast cancer Digital Mammography: Digital Mammography enhanced with an iodinated contrast agent Low Osmolar Contrast Material, 300-399 Mg/Ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml: Injection of low osmolar contrast material during the digital mammography exam |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 1, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Low Osmolar Contrast Material, 300-399 Mg/Ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml | Drug | Injection of low osmolar contrast material during the digital mammography exam |
|
| 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Breast Cancer Patients | Patients with ipsilateral intact biopsy-proven breast cancer Digital Mammography: Digital Mammography enhanced with an iodinated contrast agent Low Osmolar Contrast Material, 300-399 Mg/Ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml: Injection of low osmolar contrast material during the digital mammography exam |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Sensitivity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for CEDM | Sensitivities in predicting pCR will be calculated for CEDM and measured as AUC | The number of participants with outcomes in our trial was limited to only three. Furthermore, none of the patients had pCR -hence none of the cases have the reference standard needed to calculate this parameter (sensitivity). | Posted | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Sensitivity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for Mammography | Sensitivities in predicting pCR will be calculated for mammography measured as AUC | The number of participants with outcomes in our trial was limited to only three. Furthermore, none of the patients had pCR -hence none of the cases have the reference standard needed to calculate this parameter (sensitivity). | Posted | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Specificity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for CEDM | Specificity of predicting pCR will be calculated for CEDM and measured as AUC | The number of participants with outcomes in our trial was limited to only three. Furthermore, none of the patients had pCR -hence none of the cases have the reference standard needed to calculate this parameter (specificity). | Posted | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Specificity of Predicting pCR (Pathologic Complete Response) for Mammography | Specificity of predicting pCR will be calculated for mammography and measured as AUC | The number of participants with outcomes in our trial was limited to only three. Furthermore, none of the patients had pCR -hence none of the cases have the reference standard needed to calculate this parameter (specificity). | Posted | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Assessing pCR or Non Response | ROC analysis will be used to assess the diagnostic performance of CEDM. The Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) will be compared. A leave-one-out cross validation algorithm will be used to reduce bias from overfitting. | The number of participants with outcomes in our trial was limited to only three. Furthermore, none of the patients had pCR - hence absence of reference standard end point precludes this assessment. | Posted | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Correlation of Residual Tumor Size With Pathologic Size | Spearman's rank correlation will be used to measure the association between final pathologic and imaging tumor size | The number of participants with outcomes in our trial was limited to only three. Furthermore, none of the patients had pCR -hence none of the cases have the reference standard needed to calculate this parameter. | Posted | 4 to 6 months from initiation of neoadjuvant therapy until final surgery |
|
|
At least 30 minutes after contrast administration
Only contrast-specific side effects were collected for this study
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Breast Cancer Patients | Patients with ipsilateral intact biopsy-proven breast cancer Digital Mammography: Digital Mammography enhanced with an iodinated contrast agent Low Osmolar Contrast Material, 300-399 Mg/Ml Iodine Concentration, Per Ml: Injection of low osmolar contrast material during the digital mammography exam | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kelli Key, Ph.D. | UT Southwestern Medical Center | 214-648-8152 | Kelli.Key@UTSouthwestern.edu |
| May 22, 2023 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|