Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 1 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 2 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 3 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 4 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 5 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 6 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 9 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 13 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 17 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 1 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 2 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 3 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 4 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 5 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 6 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 9 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 13 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 17 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 1 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 2 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 3 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 4 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 5 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 6 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 9 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 13 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 17 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 1 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 2 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 3 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 4 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 5 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 6 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 9 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 13 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 17 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 1 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 2 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 3 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 4 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 5 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 6 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 7 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 8 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 9 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 10 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 11 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 12 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 13 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 14 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 15 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 16 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 17 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 18 will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 1. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 2. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 3. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 4. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 5. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 6. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 8. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 10. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 12. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 14. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 16. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 18. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious rash will be defined as rash ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe rash attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 1. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 2. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 3. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 4. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 5. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 6. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 8. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 10. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 12. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 14. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 16. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 18. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious tinnitus will be defined as tinnitus ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. Incidence will be defined as percentage of participants who have serious tinnitus. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe tinnitus attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 1. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 2. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 3. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 4. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 5. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 6. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 8. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 10. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 12. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 14. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 16. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 18. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious hearing change will be defined as hearing change ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting a severe or very severe hearing change attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 1. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 2. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score. The percentage of participants with a defined decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score will be determined.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 3. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 4. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score. The percentage of participants with a defined decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score will be determined.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 5. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 6. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score. The percentage of participants with a defined decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score will be determined.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 8. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 10. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score. The percentage of participants with a defined decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score will be determined.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 12. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 14. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score. The percentage of participants with a defined decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score will be determined.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 16. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score.

Participants' hearing ability during the last week will be assessed using the Inner Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Inner EAR) 11-question validated questionnaire administered during study week 18. The total instrument score will be tallied at each administration [range: 10 (low hearing ability) - 59 (high hearing ability)]. Serious hearing change will be defined as a ≥10-point decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score from baseline score. The percentage of participants with a defined decrease in the Inner EAR instrument score will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 1. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 2. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 3. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 4. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 5. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 6. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 8. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 10. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 12. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 14. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 16. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 18. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious cramping will be defined as cramping ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe cramping attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 1. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 2. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 3. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 4. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 5. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 6. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 8. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 10. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 12. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 14. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 16. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 18. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious dizziness/pre-syncope will be defined as dizziness/pre-syncope ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe dizziness/pre-syncope attributable to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 1. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 2. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 3. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 4. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 5. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 6. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 8. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 10. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 12. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 14. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 16. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the prior week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 18. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious unusual tiredness/weakness will be defined as unusual tiredness/weakness ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe unusual tiredness/weakness will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 1. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 2. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 3. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 4. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 5. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 6. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 8. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 10. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 12. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 14. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 16. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 18. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious chest pain will be defined as chest pain ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe chest pain will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 1. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 2. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 3. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 4. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 5. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 6. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 8. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 10. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 12. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 14. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 16. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 18. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious nausea will be defined as nausea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe nausea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 1. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 2. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 3. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 4. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 5. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 6. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 8. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 10. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 12. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 14. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 16. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 18. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious vomiting will be defined as vomiting ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe vomiting will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 1. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 2. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 3. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 4. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 5. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 6. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 8. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 10. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 12. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 14. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 16. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' dialysis-related symptoms during the last week will be assessed using an investigator-developed 13-question symptom questionnaire administered at study week 18. Each symptom will be graded using a 5-point symptom severity Likert scale (response options: none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe). Serious diarrhea will be defined as diarrhea ranked as severe or very severe and attributable to furosemide. The percentage of participants reporting severe or very severe diarrhea will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 1. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 2. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 3. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 4. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 5. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 6. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 8. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 10. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 12. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 14. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 16. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' acceptance of furosemide will be assessed using an investigator-developed 1-question questionnaire administered at study week 18. Patient-reported acceptance of furosemide at the dose during which the questionnaire is administered will be defined as an affirmative response ("yes") to the question "If recommended, would you be willing to stay on the dose of furosemide you have received during the last week?". The percentage of participants reporting acceptance of furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 1. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 2. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 3. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 4. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 5. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 6. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 8. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 10. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 12. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 14. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 16. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 18. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants' adherence to furosemide will be assessed at scheduled pill counts conducted by the study team at study week 19. Participants' adherence to furosemide will be defined <20% pills remaining at the scheduled pill counts. The percentage of participants who are adherent to furosemide will be determined.

Participants will follow standard dialysis clinic protocols for 24-urine volume collection. Classifying participants as has having an increase in 24-hour urine volume will be contingent on the amount of urine the participant makes at baseline.

• Among participants with baseline 24-hour urine volume ≥200 mL: ≥25% increase in urine volume is considered an increase.
• Among participants with baseline 24-hour urine volume <200 mL: ≥50 mL increase in urine volume to a urine volume of at least 100 mL/24-hours is considered an increase.

The percentage of participants who have a defined increase in 24-urine volume from baseline to week 12 will be determined.

Summarizing outcome events as a single arm (i.e., patients with a baseline 24-hour urine volume ≥200 mL and < 200 mL as a single group) was pre-specified in the protocol. 33 participants completed the week 12 24-hour urine volume collection. Thus, the analysis population is 33 participants.

Participants will follow standard dialysis clinic protocols for 24-urine volume collection. Classifying participants as has having an increase in 24-hour urine volume will be contingent on the amount of urine the participant makes at baseline.

• Among participants with baseline 24-hour urine volume ≥200 mL: ≥25% increase in urine volume is considered an increase.
• Among participants with baseline 24-hour urine volume <200 mL: ≥50 mL increase in urine volume to a urine volume of at least 100 mL/24-hours is considered an increase.

The percentage of participants who have a defined increase in 24-urine volume from baseline to week 18 will be determined.

Summarizing outcome events as a single arm (i.e., patients with a baseline 24-hour urine volume ≥200 mL and < 200 mL as a single group) was pre-specified in the protocol. Out of the 33 participants still enrolled in the study at week 18, 32 completed the week 18 24-hour urine volume collection. Thus, the analysis population is 32 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 1 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

38 participants completed the week 1 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 38 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 2 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 2 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 37 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 3 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 3 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 37 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 4 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 4 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 37 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 5 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 5 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 6 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 6 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 9 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 9 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 13 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

33 participants completed the week 13 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 33 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 17 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum potassium <3.2 mEq/L will be determined.

33 participants completed the week 17 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 33 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 1 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

38 participants completed the week 1 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 38 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 2 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 2 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 37 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 3 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 3 blood collection. However, there was laboratory error and serum magnesium levels were only available for 36 participants. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 4 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 4 blood collection. However, there was laboratory error and serum magnesium levels were only available for 36 participants. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 5 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 5 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 6 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 6 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 9 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 9 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 13 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

33 participants completed the week 13 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 33 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 17 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum magnesium <0.8 mEq/L will be determined.

33 participants completed the week 17 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 33 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 1 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

38 participants completed the week 1 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 38 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 2 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 2 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 37 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 3 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 3 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 37 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 4 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 4 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 37 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 5 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 5 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 6 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 6 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 9 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 9 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 13 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

33 participants completed the week 13 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 33 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 17 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum corrected calcium <7.0 mg/dL will be determined.

33 participants completed the week 17 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 33 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 1 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

38 participants completed the week 1 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 38 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 2 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 2 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 37 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 3 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 3 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 37 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 4 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

37 participants completed the week 4 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 37 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 5 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 5 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 6 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 6 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 9 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

36 participants completed the week 9 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 36 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 13 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

33 participants completed the week 13 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 33 participants.

Blood samples will be collected from participants prior to their dialysis treatments at the week 17 study visit. The percentage of participants who have a serum furosemide level >12 micrograms/L will be determined.

33 participants completed the week 17 blood collection. Thus, the analysis population is 33 participants.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 1 will be determined.

Participants' blood pressure will be measured with an upper extremity cuff in a seated position at 15-minute intervals during each hemodialysis treatment per standard dialysis clinic protocols. Dialysis-associated hypotension will be defined as hypotension during dialysis requiring hospitalization or treatment in an emergency room and not attributable to overt sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, or other cardiovascular event (e.g. aortic dissection). The percentage of participants who have dialysis-associated hypotension up to week 2 will be determined.

38 participants were still enrolled in the study at week 2. Thus, the analysis population is 38 participants.