Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
Acute appendicitis stands out as a frequently encountered surgical emergency. Despite decades of experience and research, the diagnosis remains a formidable challenge, particularly in young females experiencing acute abdominal pain, where the assessment requires consideration of a broader spectrum of potential causes. An overarching concern lies in the risk of over-treatment, leading to an escalation in unnecessary surgeries, known as the negative appendectomy rate (NAR). This elevated NAR is associated with postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stays, and avoidable healthcare expenditures. Despite international guidelines recommending the routine use of risk prediction models for patients with acute abdominal pain, reported NAR values have reached as high as 28.2% in females and 12.1% in males.
Aim:
The primary study aim is to identify optimal risk prediction models for acute RIF pain in Turkey.
The secondary aims are to audit the normal appendicectomy rate, assess whether these scores have similar efficacy in immigrants, and demonstrate nationwide clinical trends to discuss possible improvements.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Best classification performance among 4 appendicitis scoring systems (for Turkish population) | Data is used to calculate the four most commonly used adult risk prediction models: Alvarado, the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA), and Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS). Then, the performance of each scoring system will be compared with one another to find the best scoring system among them. | During admission |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Normal Appendicectomy Rate (NAR) | The NAR value is calculated as the percentage of patients with normal appendix histology who had undergone appendectomy. Patients with appendix pathology other than appendicitis (such as appendix tumor) were included in the denominator but not the numerator. | All patients are followed up for 60 days, and data being utilized for NAR calculation is collected within that timeframe. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients referred to general surgeons with right iliac fossa pain or suspected appendicitis.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sezai Leventoglu, Professor | Gazi University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gazi University | Ankara | 06560 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015746 | Abdominal Pain |
| D001064 | Appendicitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Best classification performance among 4 appendicitis scoring systems (for immigrant population) | Data is used to calculate the four most commonly used adult risk prediction models: Alvarado, the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA), and Adult Appendicitis Score (AAS). Then, the performance of each scoring system will be compared with one another to find the best scoring system among them. | During admission |
| D012817 | Signs and Symptoms, Digestive |
| D059413 | Intraabdominal Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D002429 | Cecal Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |