Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The reliability of the Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale (ASAS) has been reported to be not high enough in adult patients with acquired brain damage. The low number of patients and the heterogeneous study population have been reported as important limitations in the reliability study of this measure. Therefore, the reliability of the ASAS needs to be confirmed in stroke patients with spasticity. This study aims to investigate the inter-rater reliability of the ASAS in a study population consisting of a larger and more homogeneous patient population (those with post-stroke spasticity).
Spasticity is a motor disorder characterized by a velocity-dependent increase in tonic stretch reflex due to upper motor neuron lesion. The prevalence of post-stroke spasticity is between 17-40%. In the assessment of spasticity, although biomechanical and neurophysiological methods provide quantitative data, semi-quantitative methods are mostly used clinically. The most frequently used spasticity measures are the Modified Ashworth Scale and the Modified Tardieu Scale. However, these methods have significant disadvantages. Therefore, the search for more reliable clinical measures continues. One of the newly developed clinical scales is called the Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale (ASAS). Although ASAS has been reported to have a high level of reliability in children with cerebral palsy, the same has not been detected in adult patients with acquired brain damage. The low number of patients and the heterogeneous study population have been reported as two of the important limitations in the reliability study of this measure.
In this study, researchers aim to investigate the inter-rater reliability of the ASAS in a study population consisting of a larger and more homogeneous patient population (those with post-stroke spasticity).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Researcher 1 | The first researcher assessing elbow, wrist, and ankle spasticity, respectively |
| |
| Researcher 2 | The second researcher assessing elbow, wrist, and ankle spasticity, respectively |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale | Other | Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale is a clinical measure to assess the severity of spasticity |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale (ASAS) | The ASAS is an ordinal scale with five levels (0, 1, 2, 3, 4). The severity of spasticity increases as the level-ups.The contracture is assessed separately. Level 0 means no catch on rapid passive stretch (no spasticity), and level 4 means that the body part is fixed on the rapid passive stretch but moves on the slow passive stretch. In level 1, a catch followed by a release occurs on the rapid passive stretch. In level 2, the catch is in the second half of the range, and there is a resistance in the remaining range of motion. In level 3, the catch is in the first half of the range, and there is a resistance in the remaining range of motion. | Through study completion, an average of 2 year |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Chronic stroke patients with elbow and/or wrist and /or ankle spasticity
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| İlker Şengül, M.D. | İzmir Katip Çelebi University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| İlker Şengül | Izmir | 35360 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7192811 | Background | Lance JW. The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenberg Lecture. Neurology. 1980 Dec;30(12):1303-13. doi: 10.1212/wnl.30.12.1303. No abstract available. | |
| 18355307 | Background | Lundstrom E, Terent A, Borg J. Prevalence of disabling spasticity 1 year after first-ever stroke. Eur J Neurol. 2008 Jun;15(6):533-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02114.x. Epub 2008 Mar 18. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006429 | Hemiplegia |
| D009128 | Muscle Spasticity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010243 | Paralysis |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 23319481 | Background | Wissel J, Manack A, Brainin M. Toward an epidemiology of poststroke spasticity. Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3 Suppl 2):S13-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182762448. |
| 9826982 | Background | Pierson SH. Outcome measures in spasticity management. Muscle Nerve Suppl. 1997;6:S36-60. |
| 3809245 | Background | Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206. |
| 26762706 | Background | Love S, Gibson N, Smith N, Bear N, Blair E; Australian Cerebral Palsy Register Group. Interobserver reliability of the Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale (ASAS). Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Feb;58 Suppl 2:18-24. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13000. Epub 2016 Jan 14. |
| Background | Calame A, Singer B. Inter- and Intra-Rater Reliability of the Australian Spasticity Assessment Scale in Adults with Acquired Brain Injury. Open Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2015;3:77-86. |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009122 | Muscle Hypertonia |
| D020879 | Neuromuscular Manifestations |