Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prehospital emergency ultrasound (PEU) is being increasingly used in different preclinical emergency systems across the world. Ultrasound examinations in emergency situations, however, remain challenging even in the hospital setting despite the availability of standardized approaches such as Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST). Preclinical circumstances further complicate the adequate execution of an additional diagnostic tool such as PEU on the scene or inside a medical emergency vehicle. Furthermore, rapid translation of ultrasound findings into meaningful therapeutic consequences is considerably demanding in an environment of limited resources. If focused PEU is correctly used and patients' condition allows emergency doctors a careful ultrasound examination, it is possible to differentiate life-threatening diagnoses. PEU should be implemented in the management of emergency patients affected by trauma, cardiac arrest/shock or respiratory problems. To date it is unclear whether PEU results in improved outcome.
Some emergency cases present difficult challenges in the prehospital ultrasound examination. Portable devices designed for PEU suggest the possibility of increasing the use of ultrasound "in the field". However, to the investigator's knowledge, opportunities for real-time consultation with a second specialist including live transmission of the ultrasound picture are not being provided at any preclinical emergency facility.
Aim 1:
Feasibility of real time prehospital emergency ultrasound (PEU) transmission in a university affiliated preclinical emergency system.
Aim 2:
Identify obstacles for PEU transmission including a real time consultation of an ultrasound expert.
Hypothesis:
We expect that live streaming of emergency ultrasound images in order to allow a second opinion could improve diagnostics of life threatening conditions and help us to improve patients' safety by digital health. The use of PEU is feasible and safe.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prehospital ultrasound | Other | Feasibility of real time PEU transmission in a university affiliated preclinical emergency system. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of PEU live stream. | Numerical scale (1-10; 1 = best, 10 = poor) | 3 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Identify obstacles for PEU transmission including a real time consultation of an ultrasound expert. | Expert available on time? Communication? Duration of ultrasound examination? Duration of live stream? Delay by PEU transmission? Emergency duration with/without PEU transmission Technical problems? | 3 Months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Emergency patients affected by:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
PEU should be implemented in the management of emergency patients affected by trauma, cardiac arrest/shock or respiratory problems.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University of Vienna - Division of General Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine | Vienna | 1090 | Austria |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29940990 | Background | Botker MT, Jacobsen L, Rudolph SS, Knudsen L. The role of point of care ultrasound in prehospital critical care: a systematic review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jun 26;26(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0518-x. | |
| 31627899 | Background | van der Weide L, Popal Z, Terra M, Schwarte LA, Ket JCF, Kooij FO, Exadaktylos AK, Zuidema WP, Giannakopoulos GF. Prehospital ultrasound in the management of trauma patients: Systematic review of the literature. Injury. 2019 Dec;50(12):2167-2175. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.09.034. Epub 2019 Sep 28. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Identify obstacles for PEU transmission including a real time consultation of an ultrasound expert. |
Communication? |
| 3 Months |
| Identify obstacles for PEU transmission including a real time consultation of an ultrasound expert. | Duration of ultrasound examination? | 3 Months |
| Identify obstacles for PEU transmission including a real time consultation of an ultrasound expert. | Duration of live stream? | 3 Months |
| Identify obstacles for PEU transmission including a real time consultation of an ultrasound expert. | Delay by PEU transmission? | 3 Months |
| Identify obstacles for PEU transmission including a real time consultation of an ultrasound expert. | Emergency duration with/without PEU transmission technical problems? | 3 Months |
| 29914554 | Background | Scharonow M, Weilbach C. Prehospital point-of-care emergency ultrasound: a cohort study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jun 18;26(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0519-9. |
| 30088160 | Background | Ketelaars R, Reijnders G, van Geffen GJ, Scheffer GJ, Hoogerwerf N. ABCDE of prehospital ultrasonography: a narrative review. Crit Ultrasound J. 2018 Aug 8;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13089-018-0099-y. |
| 29723198 | Background | Marsh-Feiley G, Eadie L, Wilson P. Telesonography in emergency medicine: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2018 May 3;13(5):e0194840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194840. eCollection 2018. |
| 30306189 | Background | Schmid M, Dodt C. [Emergency lung ultrasound]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2018 Nov;113(8):616-624. doi: 10.1007/s00063-018-0485-z. Epub 2018 Oct 10. German. |
| 35331304 | Derived | Hermann M, Hafner C, Scharner V, Hribersek M, Maleczek M, Schmid A, Schaden E, Willschke H, Hamp T. Remote real-time supervision of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound: a feasibility study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022 Mar 24;30(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00985-0. |